Renal graft rejection or cyclosporin toxicity? Early diagnosis by a combination of Papanicolaou and immunocytochemical staining of urinary cytology specimens

Abstract. A method is described for distinguishing between graft rejection and cyclosporin nephrotoxicity in renal allograft recipients by analyzing fresh morning urine samples. The technique combines classic Papanicolaou with immunocytochemical staining and was performed in urine specimens from a series of 42 patients. Early‐stage cyclosporin toxicity was usually associated with increased numbers of proximal tubular cells only, whereas in rejection and late‐stage toxicity there were increases in both tubular cells and in lymphocytes and monocytes (> 2000 cells/ml urine). Differentiation between these two clinical conditions was achieved by immunostaining, which revealed that increased numbers of CD25+ and CD8+ cells, as well as an increase in the HLA‐DR/Lu5 ratio, were typical of rejection. CD25 positivity proved to be the best indicator of rejection, with a sensitivity and specificity of more than 90%. A cytodiagnostic algorithm is presented that is based on cell numbers and types, including immunophenotypes. The proposed method has the advantage of being noninvasive and appears to represent a reliable and rapid adjunct for the monitoring of graft function, especially in high‐risk patients on cyclosporin immunosuppression.

[1]  G. Prout,et al.  LYMPHOCYTES IN URINE AS AN AID IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF RENAL HOMOGRAFT REJECTION. , 1964, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[2]  P. Taft,et al.  Urinary cytology in renal transplantation: association of renal tubular cells and graft rejection. , 1966, Transplantation.

[3]  E. S. Spencer,et al.  The urinary sediment after renal transplantation. Quantitative changes as an index of the activity of the renal allograft reaction. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[4]  D. Jones,et al.  Differentiation of renal tubular epithelium in renal transplantation cytology. , 1977, American journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  T. Waldmann,et al.  A monoclonal antibody (anti-Tac) reactive with activated and functionally mature human T cells. II. Expression of Tac antigen on activated cytotoxic killer T cells, suppressor cells, and on one of two types of helper T cells. , 1981, Journal of immunology.

[6]  G. Duggin,et al.  INCREASED EXPRESSION OF HLA-DR ANTIGENS ON RENAL TUBULAR CELLS IN RENAL TRANSPLANTS: RELEVANCE TO THE REJECTION RESPONSE , 1984, The Lancet.

[7]  W. Vaughn,et al.  RENAL ALLOGRAFT CELL INFILTRATES ASSOCIATED WITH IRREVERSIBLE REJECTION , 1985, Transplantation.

[8]  R. Calne,et al.  CYCLOSPORIN IN CADAVERIC RENAL TRANSPLANTATION: 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF A EUROPEAN MULTICENTRE TRIAL , 1985, The Lancet.

[9]  R. Atkins,et al.  IMMUNOHISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SERIAL BIOPSIES TAKEN DURING HUMAN RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION: CHANGING PROFILE OF INFILTRATING CELLS AND ACTIVATION OF THE COAGULATION SYSTEM , 1985, Transplantation.

[10]  B. Ryffel,et al.  Morphological patterns in cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients. , 1985, Transplantation proceedings.

[11]  A. Sheil,et al.  Immunopathology of renal allograft rejection analyzed with monoclonal antibodies to mononuclear cell markers. , 1986, Kidney international.

[12]  M. Mihatsch,et al.  VALUE OF URINARY SEDIMENT IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTERSTITIAL REJECTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANTS1 , 1986, Transplantation.

[13]  P. Berloco,et al.  Monitoring of ciclosporin toxicity by exfoliative urinary cytology in renal transplantation. , 1986, Contributions to nephrology.

[14]  A randomized clinical trial of cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. Analysis at three years. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  H. Tanke,et al.  Expression of HLA-DR antigens on peripheral blood T lymphocytes and renal graft tubular epithelial cells in association with rejection. , 1986, Transplantation.

[16]  F. Fatone,et al.  Flow cytometry analysis of urinary cytology in renal transplantation. , 1987, Transplantation proceedings.

[17]  D. Eggensperger,et al.  The utility of cytodiagnostic urinalysis for monitoring renal allograft injury. A clinicopathological analysis of 87 patients and over 1,000 urine specimens. , 1988, American journal of nephrology.

[18]  G. H. Clowes,et al.  SEQUENTIAL DETERMINATIONS OF URINARY CYTOLOGY AND PLASMA AND URINARY LYMPHOKINES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS , 1989, Transplantation.

[19]  M. Raftery,et al.  Diagnosis of rejection in renal allograft biopsies using the presence of activated and proliferating cells. , 1989, Transplantation.

[20]  T. Waldmann,et al.  Prolongation of primate renal allograft survival by anti-Tac, an anti-human IL-2 receptor monoclonal antibody. , 1989, Transplantation.