Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.

The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a murine model developed to evaluate the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. The LLNA is an alternative approach to traditional guinea pig methods and in comparison provides important animal welfare benefits. The assay relies on measurement of events induced during the induction phase of skin sensitization, specifically lymphocyte proliferation in the draining lymph nodes which is a hallmark of a skin sensitization response. Since its introduction the LLNA has been the subject of extensive evaluation on a national and international scale, and has been successfully validated and incorporated worldwide into regulatory guidelines. Experience gained in recent years has demonstrated that adherence to published procedures and guidelines for the LLNA (e.g., with respect to dose and vehicle selection) is critical for the successful conduct and eventual interpretation of the data. In addition to providing a robust method for skin sensitization hazard identification, the LLNA has proven very useful in assessing the skin sensitizing potency of test chemicals, and this has provided invaluable information to risk assessors. The primary method to make comparisons of the relative potency of chemical sensitizers is to use linear interpolation to estimate the concentration of chemical required to induce a stimulation index of three relative to concurrent vehicle-treated controls (EC3). In certain situations where there are available less than optimal dose response data a log-linear extrapolation method can be used to estimate an EC3 value which can reduce significantly the need for repeat testing of chemicals. The LLNA, when conducted according to published guidelines, provides a robust method for skin sensitization testing that not only provides reliable hazard identification information but also data necessary for effective risk assessment and risk management.

[1]  I Kimber,et al.  Dendritic cells and cutaneous immune responses to chemical allergens. , 1992, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[2]  D. Basketter,et al.  Toxicology of Contact Dermatitis: Allergy, Irritancy and Urticaria , 1999 .

[3]  I Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[4]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[5]  I. Kimber,et al.  Toxicology of Contact Hypersensitivity , 1996 .

[6]  I Kimber,et al.  Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests. , 1998, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[7]  W Slob,et al.  A quantitative method for assessing the sensitizing potency of low molecular weight chemicals using a local lymph node assay: employment of a regression method that includes determination of the uncertainty margins. , 2000, Toxicology.

[8]  J Hilton,et al.  Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. , 1996, Toxicology.

[9]  I. Kimber,et al.  Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[10]  I Kimber,et al.  Threshold for classification as a skin sensitizer in the local lymph node assay: a statistical evaluation. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[11]  D. Basketter,et al.  Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[12]  I. Kimber,et al.  Langerhans cell migration , 2000, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[13]  I Kimber,et al.  Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. , 2001, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[14]  I. Kimber,et al.  Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra‐ and inter‐laboratory evaluations , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[15]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. , 1994, Toxicology.

[16]  Ian Kimber,et al.  A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin‐sensitization testing , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[17]  I Kimber,et al.  Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay. , 2001, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[18]  I Kimber,et al.  Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. , 2003, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[19]  D. Basketter,et al.  Reproducible prediction of contact allergenic potency using the local lymph node assay , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  Ian Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: past, present and future , 2002, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  I. Kimber,et al.  REVIEWCytokines and chemokines in the initiation and regulation of epidermal Langerhans cell mobilization , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[22]  I Kimber,et al.  Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay. , 1995, Toxicology.

[23]  I Kimber,et al.  Investigation of lymph node cell proliferation as a possible immunological correlate of contact sensitizing potential. , 1991, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[24]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay in practice: a current regulatory perspective , 2006, Human & experimental toxicology.

[25]  Ian Kimber,et al.  The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay , 2001, Contact dermatitis.

[26]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Contact sensitization: A new approach to risk assessment , 1997 .

[27]  W S Stokes,et al.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[28]  I Kimber,et al.  A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.