Attention and Memory for Newspaper Advertisements: Effects of Ad–Editorial Congruency and Location

Summary: Previous research suggests that the same ad can have different effects depending upon the media context in which the ad appears. This experiment investigated how the semantic relation between the content of advertisements and editorial texts, and the ad location on newspaper pages affect attention and memory for advertisements. We recorded participants’ eye movements while they read newspaper articles to rate how interesting the texts were. Recognition for ads, logos, and editorial headlines was measured on the following day. Results revealed a discrepancy between attention and memory results, suggesting that incongruency increased attention to ads, whereas congruency improved recognition of ads. In addition, ads presented on the right attracted more attention and were recognized better than ads on the left. The results have implications for pretesting of advertisements, because attention and memory for ads were associated with higher preference for brands, and purchase intention was enhanced for the brands that were recognized. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Claire Allison Stammerjohan,et al.  BANNER ADVERTISER-WEB SITE CONTEXT CONGRUITY AND COLOR EFFECTS ON ATTENTION AND ATTITUDES , 2005 .

[2]  Tad T. Brunyé,et al.  When goals constrain: Eye movements and memory for goal‐Oriented map study , 2009 .

[3]  Micael Dahlen.  THE MEDIUM AS A CONTEXTUAL CUE: Effects of Creative Media Choice , 2005 .

[4]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[5]  P. Diggle,et al.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 2003 .

[6]  Gangseog Ryu,et al.  Preattentive processing of banner advertisements: The role of modality, location, and interference , 2007, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[7]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements: , 1987 .

[8]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Lynda Lee Kaid,et al.  Political Advertising and Information Seeking: Comparing Exposure via Traditional and Internet Channels , 2002 .

[10]  N. Mackworth,et al.  Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Lizzie Maughan,et al.  Like more, look more. Look more, like more: The evidence from eye-tracking , 2007 .

[12]  Youjae Yi.  Cognitive and affective priming effects of the context for print advertisements , 1990 .

[13]  E. Malthouse,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Relationship between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness , 2009 .

[14]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Measures of sensitivity based on a single hit rate and false alarm rate: The accuracy, precision, and robustness of′,Az, andA’ , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Integrating text and pictorial information: eye movements when looking at print advertisements. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[16]  J M Findlay,et al.  A probability vector and transition matrix analysis of eye movements during visual search. , 1995, Acta psychologica.

[17]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[18]  Micael Dahlen,et al.  Effects of Ad-Brand Incongruence , 2005 .

[19]  C. Yoo.  Unconscious processing of Web advertising: Effects on implicit memory, attitude toward the brand, and consideration set , 2008 .

[20]  Kendall Goodrich,et al.  What's Up? , 2010, Journal of Advertising Research.

[21]  Claire E. Norris,et al.  Context Effects on Recall and Recognition of Magazine Advertisements. , 1992 .

[22]  Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al.  More than Words: On the Importance of Picture–Text Congruence in the Online Environment , 2010 .

[23]  R. Pieters,et al.  Attention switching during scene perception: how goals influence the time course of eye movements across advertisements. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[24]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Emotionality and Semantic Onsets: Exploring Orienting Attention Responses in Advertising , 2010 .

[25]  Stewart Shapiro,et al.  When an Ad's Influence Is beyond Our Conscious Control: Perceptual and Conceptual Fluency Effects Caused by Incidental Ad Exposure , 1999 .

[26]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Responses to Information Incongruency in Advertising: The Role of Expectancy, Relevancy, and Humor , 1999 .

[27]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation , 2004 .

[28]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Stephen D. Goldinger,et al.  Schema‐driven source misattribution errors: remembering the expected from a witnessed event , 2008 .

[30]  K. Finlay,et al.  Priming Effects in Explicit and Implicit Memory for Textual Advertisements , 2005 .

[31]  A. Flykt,et al.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. , 2001 .

[32]  Guillaume Hervet,et al.  Is Banner Blindness Genuine? Eye Tracking Internet Text Advertising , 2011 .

[33]  G. Underwood,et al.  Congruency, saliency and gist in the inspection of objects in natural scenes , 2007 .

[34]  Chris Janiszewski.  Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects , 1993 .

[35]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[36]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings , 2000 .

[37]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Display Characteristics on Visual Exploratory Search Behavior , 1998 .

[38]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency? , 1992 .

[39]  Anssi Öörni,et al.  The Effects of Animation and Format on the Perception and Memory of Online Advertising , 2010 .

[40]  Kendall Goodrich.  Anarchy of effects? Exploring attention to online advertising and multiple outcomes , 2011 .

[41]  Peter De Graef.  Semantic effects on object selection in real-world scene perception , 2005 .

[42]  P. Neijens,et al.  The Effects of Magazine-Induced Psychological Responses and Thematic Congruence on Memory and Attitude toward the Ad in a Real-Life Setting , 2002 .

[43]  Fuyuan Shen,et al.  Joint Advertising and Brand Congruity: Effects on Memory and Attitudes , 2009 .

[44]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  J. Hardin,et al.  Generalized Estimating Equations , 2002 .

[46]  Rik Pieters,et al.  Attention Capture and Transfer in Advertising: Brand, Pictorial, and Text-Size Effects , 2004 .

[47]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[48]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  The impact of salient advertisements on reading and attention on web pages. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[49]  Fuyuan Shen,et al.  Contextual Priming and Applicability: Implications for Ad Attitude and Brand Evaluations , 2007 .