Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady State Responses in Cochlear Implant Users

Auditory steady state responses are neural potentials in response to repeated auditory stimuli. This study shows that electrically evoked auditory steady state responses (EASSRs) to low-rate pulse trains can be reliably recorded by electrodes placed on the scalp of a cochlear implant (CI) user and separated from the artifacts generated by the electrical stimulation. Response properties are described, and the predictive value of EASSRs for behaviorally hearing thresholds is analyzed. For six users of a Cochlear Nucleus CI, EASSRs to symmetric biphasic pulse trains with rates between 35 and 47 Hz were recorded with seven scalp electrodes. The influence of various stimulus parameters was assessed: pulse rate, stimulus intensity, monopolar or bipolar stimulation mode, and presentation of either one pulse train on one electrode or interleaved pulse trains with different pulse rates on multiple electrodes. To compensate for the electrical artifacts caused by the stimulus pulses and radio frequency transmission, different methods of artifact reduction were employed. The validity of the recorded responses was confirmed by recording on–off responses, determination of response latency across the measured pulse rates, and comparison of amplitude growth of stimulus artifact and response amplitude. For stimulation in the 40 Hz range, response latencies of 35.6 ms (SD = 5.3 ms) were obtained. Responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli on different electrodes can be evoked, and the electrophysiological thresholds determined from EASSR amplitude growth in the 40 Hz range correlate well with behaviorally determined threshold levels for pulse rates of 41 Hz.

[1]  Takao Hashimoto,et al.  A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  G. Nikiforidis,et al.  Reduced Variance in the latency and Amplitude of the Fifth Wave of Auditory Brain Stem Response after Normalization for Head Size , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Latencies of Auditory Steady-State Responses Recorded in Early Infancy , 2009, Audiology and Neurotology.

[4]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli , 1995 .

[5]  Zhiyue Lin,et al.  Adaptive cancellation of the pacing stimulus artifact in the gastric myoelectrical recordings , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Zabih Ghassemlooy,et al.  Pulse time modulation techniques for optical communications: a review , 1993 .

[7]  Francisco Del Pozo,et al.  Hybrid stimulator for chronic experiments , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Herman B. K. Boom,et al.  Bridging Disciplines For Biomedicine , 1997 .

[9]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[10]  S Makeig,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses: threshold prediction using phase coherence. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  T W Picton,et al.  Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): stimulus and recording parameters. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[12]  M. Dorman,et al.  Minimization of cochlear implant stimulus artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  E. Truy,et al.  Auditory steady-state response evaluation of auditory thresholds in cochlear implant patients. , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[14]  J. Robert Boston,et al.  Spectra of Auditory Brainstem Responses and Spontaneous EEG , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Zhiyue Lin,et al.  Adaptive stimulus artifact cancellation in gastric myoelectrical signals , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[16]  Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al.  Speech Perception in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant Users with Processor Settings Based on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds , 2002, Audiology and Neurotology.

[17]  C. James,et al.  Objective source selection in Blind Source Separation of AEPs in children with Cochlear Implants , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .

[19]  L. Giovangrandi,et al.  A multi-parameter, feedback-based electrical stimulation system for cardiomyocyte cultures , 2003, TRANSDUCERS '03. 12th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.03TH8664).

[20]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Clinical Application of Dichotic Multiple-Stimulus Auditory Steady-State Responses in High-Risk Newborns and Young Children , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[21]  Terence W Picton,et al.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  A. Beiter,et al.  Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[23]  J. Hall.  Auditory brainstem frequency following responses to waveform envelope periodicity. , 1979, Science.

[24]  R. N. Scott,et al.  Stimulus artefact in somatosensory evoked potential measurement , 1997, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[25]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady-State Responses in a Guinea Pig Model: Latency Estimates and Effects of Stimulus Parameters , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[26]  Steve M. Potter,et al.  Real-time multi-channel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  S. Makeig,et al.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Kush Paul,et al.  Spectral cancellation of microstimulation artifact for simultaneous neural recording in situ , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  J. R. Hughes,et al.  Brief, noninjurious electric waveform for stimulation of the brain. , 1955, Science.

[30]  F. Biering-Sørensen,et al.  Functional neuromuscular stimulation controlled by surface electromyographic signals produced by volitional activation of the same muscle: adaptive removal of the muscle response from the recorded EMG-signal. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: phase and latency measurements , 2000, Hearing Research.

[32]  Chris Daniel. Geisler,et al.  Average responses to clicks in man recorded by scalp electrodes , 1960 .

[33]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Electrically Evoked Auditory Steady-State Responses in Guinea Pigs , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[34]  T. Brunelli,et al.  Comparison between NRT‐based MAPs and behaviourally measured MAPs at different stimulation rates – a multicentre investigation , 2003 .

[35]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system , 2008, Hearing Research.

[36]  H J Spencer.  An automatic, optically isolated, biphasic constant current stimulator adapter for artefact suppression. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  Shigeyuki Kuwada,et al.  Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[38]  Richard Grieve,et al.  Nonlinear adaptive filtering of stimulus artifact , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  T Blogg,et al.  A digital technique for stimulus artifact reduction. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[40]  Heleen Luts,et al.  A flexible research platform for multi-channel auditory steady-state response measurements , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[41]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Optimal electrode selection for multi-channel electroencephalogram based detection of auditory steady-state responses. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses to AM and FM Stimuli , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.

[44]  R.N. Scott,et al.  Adaptive stimulus artifact reduction in noncortical somatosensory evoked potential studies , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  B. Widrow,et al.  On the Nature and Elimination of Stimulus Artifact in Nerve Signals Evoked and Recorded Using Surface Electrodes , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  C. Richter.  Cochlear Implants: Fundamentals and Applications , 2004 .

[47]  R. Merletti,et al.  Suppression of stimulation artifacts from myoelectric-evoked potential recordings , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  G M Clark,et al.  A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  H. Kunov,et al.  Wavelet based reduction of stimulus artifact in evoked otoacoustic emissions testing , 1995, Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[50]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady state potentials. , 1984, Ear and hearing.

[51]  Gregory T. A. Kovacs,et al.  A closed-loop electrical stimulation system for cardiac cell cultures , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  Jorge Bohórquez,et al.  Generation of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) explained using convolution , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[53]  Hualou Liang,et al.  Stimulus artifact cancellation in the serosal recordings of gastric myoelectric activity using wavelet transform , 2002, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[54]  Terence W Picton,et al.  Multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[55]  G M Clark,et al.  The Automated Prediction of Hearing Thresholds in Sleeping Subjects Using Auditory Steady‐State Evoked Potentials , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[56]  Gary Rance,et al.  Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[57]  J Wouters,et al.  Comparison of Procedures to Determine Electrical Stimulation Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, Ear and hearing.

[58]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Frequency‐Specific Audiometry Using Steady‐State Responses , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[59]  Jan Wouters,et al.  Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences with Combined Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimulation , 2009, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[60]  T W Picton,et al.  Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.