Dispersed entrepreneurship within multinational corporations: A community perspective

The paper develops a new theoretical perspective on the phenomenon of dispersed entrepreneurship in large multinational corporations (MNCs). We argue that the creation and sharing of knowledge in entrepreneurial initiatives involving MNCs is underpinned by a behavioural theory of entrepreneurial communities and that these communities drive the evolution of the MNC organization. While we do not refute related theories of the organization as a social community or communities of practice providing a basis for learning and innovation, we suggest that a different kind of community facilitates dispersed entrepreneurial behaviours within the MNC. This community links participants by a shared desire to create new knowledge for international competition. To succeed in discovering, evaluating and exploiting new opportunities, managers need to allow and nurture situations of high-boundary porosity. The main characteristics, antecedents and consequences of these communities are identified and presented as a conceptual model.

[1]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[2]  John Henry Clippinger,et al.  The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise , 2000 .

[3]  M. Forsgren.  The Use of Network Theory in MNC Research , 2004 .

[4]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  THE ORGANIZATION AS POLITICAL ARENA , 1985 .

[5]  E. Bott,et al.  Family and Social Network; Roles Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary, Urban Families. , 1969 .

[6]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .

[7]  D. Kuratko,et al.  Developing an Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument for an Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment , 1990 .

[8]  D. Slevin,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior , 1991 .

[9]  Donald Hislop,et al.  The Complex Relations Between Communities of Practice and the Implementation of Technological Innovations , 2003 .

[10]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters‐subsidiary relations , 1994 .

[11]  Arnold S. Tannenbaum,et al.  Organizational Control Structure , 1963 .

[12]  Beth A. Bechky.  Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Israel M. Kirzner.  Competition and Entrepreneurship , 1973 .

[14]  J. Birkinshaw.  Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations : The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives , 1997 .

[15]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  S. Zahra,et al.  International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance - The moderating effect of international environmental hostility , 2000 .

[17]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Internal differentiation within multinational corporations , 1989 .

[18]  G. Hedlund,et al.  Assumptions of Hierarchy and Heterarchy, with Applications to the Management of the Multinational Corporation , 1993 .

[19]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[20]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[21]  J. Crant.  Proactive Behavior in Organizations , 2000 .

[22]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[23]  G. Hedlund.  A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporation , 2007 .

[24]  Gregg A. Lichtenstein,et al.  The Entrepreneurial Development System: Transforming Business Talent and Community Economies , 2001 .

[25]  Stephen Young,et al.  Centralization and autonomy: back to the future , 2004 .

[26]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  Creating corporate entrepreneurship , 1994 .

[27]  D. Wellman,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[28]  van der Taco Vaart,et al.  Social value orientation, organizational goal concerns and interdepartmental problem‐solving behavior , 2002 .

[29]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[30]  Herbert A. Simon.  We and they: the human urge to identify with groups , 2002 .

[31]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[32]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning , 2001 .

[33]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization , 2000 .

[34]  W. Starbuck.  Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[35]  Refik Culpan.  The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation , 1997 .

[36]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  THE DOMINANT LOGIC: RETROSPECTIVE AND EXTENSION , 1995 .

[37]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management: Insights from a Process Study , 1983 .

[38]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[39]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[40]  T. Deal,et al.  Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. , 1982 .

[41]  Jeffrey S. Hornsby,et al.  An Interactive Model of the Corporate Entrepreneurship Process , 1993 .

[42]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[43]  Jean M. Bartunek,et al.  Qualitative research can add new meanings to quantitative research , 2002 .

[44]  G. Hedlund.  The hypermodern MNC—A heterarchy? , 1986 .

[45]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. , 1993 .

[46]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1990 .

[47]  J. March,et al.  Handbook of organizations , 1966 .

[48]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Entrepreneurship as Innovation , 2000 .

[49]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[50]  R. Baron.  Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when enterpreneurs think differently than other people , 1998 .

[51]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[52]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[53]  F. Tönnies,et al.  Community and association (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft) , 1955 .

[54]  R. Kanter.  The Change Masters: Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work , 1985 .

[55]  B. Kogut.  The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[56]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Fighting the corporate immune system: a process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations , 1999 .

[57]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[58]  Corporate Entrepreneurship: Changing Perspectives , 1997 .

[59]  G. Dobbins,et al.  Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis , 1997 .

[60]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing the Global Firm , 1990 .

[61]  R. Swedberg.  Entrepreneurship : the social science view , 2000 .

[62]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[63]  Thomas W. Malnight.  The Transition from Decentralized to Network-Based MNC Structures: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1996 .

[64]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Knowledge flows, governance and the multinational enterprise : frontiers in international management research , 2004 .

[65]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[66]  Steven C. Michael.  Entrepreneurship as Strategy: Competing on the Entrepreneurial Edge , 2000 .

[67]  T. Parsons.  SUGGESTIONS FOR A SOCIALOGICAL APPROCH TO THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1956 .

[68]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[69]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches , 1985 .

[70]  Morgan P. Miles,et al.  Exploring the Practice of Corporate Venturing: Some Common Forms and Their Organizational Implications , 2002 .

[71]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[72]  T. Schelling.  The Strategy of Conflict , 1963 .

[73]  Alice Lam.  Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework , 2000 .

[74]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[75]  P. Ghauri,et al.  International Management: A Reader , 1995 .

[76]  Lars Otterbeck.  The Management of headquarters : subsidiary relationships in multinational corporations , 1981 .

[77]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[78]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[79]  E. Bott.  Family and Social Network; Roles, Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families. , 1971 .

[80]  M. Buber.  Between Man and Man , 1961 .

[81]  J. Orr.  Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service culture. , 1990 .

[82]  Olga Tregaskis.  Learning networks, power and legitimacy in multinational subsidiaries , 2003 .

[83]  Timothy S. Reed,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the New Competitive Landscape , 2000 .