Outcome of PCI with Xience versus other commonly used modern drug eluting stents: A SCAAR report
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Erlinge | B. Svennblad | S. Buccheri | S. James | O. Angerås | B. Lagerqvist | S. Völz | P. Grimfjärd | Elin Bergman
[1] M. Zwahlen,et al. Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial , 2019, The Lancet.
[2] P. Teirstein,et al. Clinical Outcomes Prior to and Following Complete Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Resorption: Five-Year Follow-Up From the ABSORB III Trial. , 2019, Circulation.
[3] S. James,et al. Clinical and angiographic outcomes of bioabsorbable vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents in Sweden: a report from the Swedish Coronary and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). , 2019, European heart journal.
[4] Volkmar Falk,et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[5] F. Eberli,et al. Ultrathin-strut, biodegradable-polymer, sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin-strut, durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary revascularisation: 5-year outcomes of the BIOSCIENCE randomised trial , 2018, The Lancet.
[6] J. Spertus,et al. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document , 2018, European heart journal.
[7] I. Meredith,et al. Final five-year clinical outcomes in the EVOLVE trial: a randomised evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting stent. , 2018, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[8] J. Massaro,et al. Ultrathin, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation (BIOFLOW V): a randomised trial , 2017, The Lancet.
[9] A. Kastrati,et al. State of the art: coronary artery stents - past, present and future. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[10] Bernard Chevalier,et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial , 2016, The Lancet.
[11] S. Pocock,et al. Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.
[12] J. Mehilli,et al. Stent Polymers: Do They Make a Difference? , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[13] W. Cheong,et al. 1-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis , 2016, The Lancet.
[14] S. Bangalore. Drug-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stents for Coronary Artery Disease , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.
[15] P. Serruys,et al. Comparison of Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[16] F. Eberli,et al. Effects of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents or bare metal stent on fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events: patient level meta-analysis , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[17] Mario Fusaro,et al. Bare metal stents, durable polymer drug eluting stents, and biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents for coronary artery disease: mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis , 2013, BMJ.
[18] Sunilkumar,et al. Outcomes With Various Drug-Eluting or Bare Metal Stents in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2013 .
[19] E. Omerovic,et al. Lower risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis with unrestricted use of 'new-generation' drug-eluting stents: a report from the nationwide Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). , 2012, European heart journal.
[20] Helmut Baumgartner,et al. ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .
[21] L. Wallentin,et al. Abstract 1428: Statin Use After Myocardial Iinfarction Improves Survival in Nearly All With Renal Dysfunction: Data From the Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) , 2009 .