Limiting pumping from the Edwards Aquifer: An economic investigation of proposals, water markets, and spring flow guarantees

The Edwards Aquifer, near San Antonio, Texas, is an important water source for both pumping and spring flow, which in turn provides water for recreation and habitat for several endangered species. A management authority is charged with aquifer management and is mandated to reduce pumping, facilitate water markets, protect agricultural rights, and protect the species habitat. This paper examines the economic dimensions of authority duties. A combined hydrologic-economic model is used in the investigation. The results indicate that proposed pumping limits are shown to have large consequences for agricultural usage and to decrease the welfare of current aquifer pumping users. However, the spring flow habitat is found to be protected, and the gains from that protection would have to exceed pumping user losses in order for the protection measures to increase regional economic welfare. Agricultural guarantees are shown to cause use value differences, indicating the opportunity for emergence of an active water market. Fixed quantity pumping limits are found to be an expensive way of insuring adequate spring flow.

[1]  B. McCarl,et al.  Effect of USDA Commodity Programs on Annual Pumpage from the Edwards Aquifer , 1997 .

[2]  B. McCarl,et al.  Economic and Hydrologic Implications of Suspending Irrigation in Dry Years , 1998 .

[3]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Price Endogenous Mathematical Programming As a Tool for Sector Analysis , 1980 .

[4]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[5]  S. Renzetti An econometric study of industrial water demands in British Columbia, Canada , 1988 .

[6]  Ronald C. Griffin,et al.  Seasonality in Community Water Demand , 1991 .

[7]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Cropping Activities in Agricultural Sector Models: A Methodological Proposal , 1982 .

[8]  F. Ward,et al.  Is dominant use management compatible with basin‐wide economic efficiency? , 1997 .

[9]  William J. Baumol,et al.  The theory of environmental policy : externalities, public outlays, and the quality of life , 1975 .

[10]  B. McCarl,et al.  IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT VERSUS HYDROELECTRIC GENERATION: CAN INTERRUPTIBLE IRRIGATION PLAY A ROLE? , 1988 .

[11]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  A Nonlinear Mixed Integer Program Model for Evaluating Runoff Impoundments for Supplemental Irrigation , 1995 .

[12]  Dennis R. Schurmeier,et al.  Innovative Approaches to Water Allocation: The Potential for Water Markets , 1986 .

[13]  B. McCarl,et al.  The Edwards Aquifer's Water Resource Conflict: USDA Farm Program Increase Irrigation Water-Use? , 1999 .

[14]  A. Michelsen,et al.  Economics of optioning agricultural water rights for urban water supplies during drought , 1993 .

[15]  John R. Williams,et al.  The EPIC crop growth model , 1989 .

[16]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  Managing Water Scarcity: An Evaluation of Interregional Transfers , 1984 .

[17]  R. Peralta,et al.  Integrated embedding optimization applied to Salt Lake Valley aquifers , 1994 .