Position control of a 3 DOF piezohydraulic parallel micromanipulator

This paper focuses on the open-loop and closed-loop position control of a tripod-like joint-free parallel micromanipulator that is composed of three piezohydraulic actuation systems. The micromanipulator is controlled in open-loop using a general inverse kinematics model. Open-loop control is sufficient in many applications but when high accuracy and high speed are required, closed-loop control must be applied. The closed-loop control of the micromanipulator is organized in multiple levels. The first level compensates nonlinearities of the actuation systems and the second level controls the position of the end-effector. Level three is a supervisory level and level four tackles automatic operations. Level two, i.e. the position feedback controller, consists essentially of two single input/single output (SISO) proportional-integral (PI) controllers and an incremental form of the inverse kinematics model. The experimental results show that the position feedback control efficiently eliminates drift and vibration of the end-effector.

[1]  Quan Zhou,et al.  A 3-DOF piezohydraulic parallel micromanipulator , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[2]  Fumihito Arai,et al.  Design and dextrous control of micromanipulator with 6 D.O.F , 1991, Fifth International Conference on Advanced Robotics 'Robots in Unstructured Environments.

[3]  Bradley J. Nelson,et al.  Visually guided microassembly using optical microscopes and active vision techniques , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Manipulating biological and mechanical micro-objects using LIGA-microfabricated end-effectors , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[5]  Ralph L. Hollis,et al.  A six degree-of-freedom magnetically levitated variable compliance fine motion wrist , 1988 .

[6]  Kok-Meng Lee,et al.  Dynamic analysis of a three-degrees-of-freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[7]  Kenneth Y. Goldberg,et al.  Parallel microassembly with electrostatic force fields , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[8]  Tomomasa Sato,et al.  Novel manipulator for micro object handling as interface between micro and human worlds , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '93).

[9]  R. Larsonneur,et al.  Calibration and basic motion of a micro hand module , 1993, Proceedings of IECON '93 - 19th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design of a minimum surface-effect three degree-of-freedom micromanipulator , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Kok-Meng Lee,et al.  Kinematic analysis of a three degrees of freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  John T. Feddema,et al.  CAD-driven microassembly and visual servoing , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[13]  Ian W. Hunter,et al.  Manipulation and dynamic mechanical testing of microscopic objects using a tele-micro-robot system , 1990 .

[14]  Fumihito Arai,et al.  Adhesion-type micro end effector for micromanipulation , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Ralph L. Hollis,et al.  A six-degree-of-freedom magnetically levitated variable compliance fine-motion wrist: design, modeling, and control , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Quan Zhou,et al.  An actuation system for parallel link micromanipulators , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS '96.