PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF BIOSURFACTANTS PRODUCED BY Pseudomonas aeruginosa B031 ISOLATED FROM A HYDROCARBON PHYTOREMEDIATION FIELD

The biosurfactants are used by several industrial sectors such as petroleum, agriculture, food production, chemistry, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. Because of their hydrophobic and hydrophilic moieties, they have potency to reduce surface tension, interfacial tension between water-hydrocarbon systems, and low micelle concentration. Their characteristics strongly depend on the producer strain as well as on the medium composition, such as carbon and nitrogen sources. This study was conducted to investigate the influence of different sources of carbon (n-hexadecane, glycerol and glucose) and nitrogen (urea, NH 4 Cl and NaNO 3 ) for the production of biosurfactants by a new strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa B031 isolated from a rhizosphere of Paraserianthes falcataria L. Nielsen, a hardwood plant species at a phytoremediation field. The biosurfactant characteristics of the strain were evaluated, particularly its surface-active properties and potential to remove hydrocarbon. Glycerol was found to be the optimum carbon source, with rhamnose concentration, emulsification index, and critical micelle concentration (CMC) of 718 mg/L, 37%, and 35 mN/m, respectively. NaNO 3 was observed as the optimum nitrogen source, with rhamnose concentration, emulsification index, and CMC of 290 mg/L, 30%, and 24 mN/m, respectively. These biosurfactants efficiently reduced surface tension of culture broth from 42 mN/m to 31 mN/m for the glycerol treatment and from 37 mN/m to 24 mN/m for the sodium nitrate treatment. The crude biosurfactants from the glycerol and sodium nitrate treatments also removed 87.5% and 84%, respectively, of crude oil from sand. These rates were higher than those of the chemical surfactants (SDS and Triton X-100). These findings indicate that the biosurfactants produced by the strain from both glycerol and NaNO 3 treatments can efficiently decrease the interfacial tension of culture broth dilution and have a high emulsion index, thus hold promise in hydrocarbon bioremediation application.

[1]  A. Shanmugam,et al.  Isolation and chemical characteristics of rhamnose enriched polysaccharide from Grateloupia lithophila. , 2018, Carbohydrate polymers.

[2]  B. Jańczuk,et al.  Wetting and adhesion properties of rhamnolipid and surfactin , 2018, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives.

[3]  W. Ling,et al.  Rhamnolipid influences biosorption and biodegradation of phenanthrene by phenanthrene-degrading strain Pseudomonas sp. Ph6. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[4]  A. Imran,et al.  Successful phytoremediation of crude-oil contaminated soil at an oil exploration and production company by plants-bacterial synergism , 2018, International journal of phytoremediation.

[5]  M. Monteiro,et al.  Glycerol from biodiesel production: technological paths for sustainability. , 2018 .

[6]  Ibrahim M. Banat,et al.  Biosurfactants: Production and potential applications in microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) , 2018 .

[7]  M. Kalita,et al.  Application of biosurfactant for enhancement of bioremediation process of crude oil contaminated soil , 2018 .

[8]  L. Ju,et al.  Maximize rhamnolipid production with low foaming and high yield. , 2018, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[9]  A. Cristaldi,et al.  Phytoremediation of contaminated soils by heavy metals and PAHs. A brief review , 2017 .

[10]  Jie Zhuang,et al.  Microbial mechanisms controlling the rhizosphere effect of ryegrass on degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an aged-contaminated agricultural soil , 2017 .

[11]  O. Darwesh,et al.  Biosurfactant production by haloalkaliphilic Bacillus strains isolated from Red Sea, Egypt , 2017 .

[12]  M. Nicolò,et al.  The role of glutamine in Pseudomonas mediterranea in biotechnological processes. , 2017, New biotechnology.

[13]  Ş. Helvacı,et al.  Surface adsorption and spontaneous aggregation of rhamnolipid mixtures in aqueous solutions , 2017 .

[14]  A. Macierzanka,et al.  Rhamnolipid CMC prediction. , 2017, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[15]  S. Varjani,et al.  Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[16]  V. Upasani,et al.  Carbon spectrum utilization by an indigenous strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCIM 5514: Production, characterization and surface active properties of biosurfactant. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[17]  E. Vinogradov,et al.  Structural studies of the rhamnose-rich cell wall polysaccharide of Lactobacillus casei BL23. , 2016, Carbohydrate research.

[18]  M. Links,et al.  Enrichment and identification of biosurfactant-producing oil field microbiota utilizing electron acceptors other than oxygen and nitrate. , 2016, Journal of biotechnology.

[19]  Q. Kong,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission and microbial community dynamics during simultaneous nitrification and denitrification process. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[20]  Fulin Chen,et al.  Effects of nutrition optimization strategy on rhamnolipid production in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain DN1 for bioremediation of crude oil , 2016 .

[21]  P. V. Bramhachari,et al.  Optimization of rhamnolipid biosurfactant production by mangrove sediment bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa KVD-HR42 using response surface methodology , 2016 .

[22]  I. Banat,et al.  Rhamnolipid and surfactin production from olive oil mill waste as sole carbon source. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[23]  M. Doble,et al.  Biosurfactant from Pseudomonas species with waxes as carbon source – Their production, modeling and properties , 2015 .

[24]  A. Franks,et al.  PGPR enhanced phytoremediation of petroleum contaminated soil and rhizosphere microbial community response. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[25]  V. Saravanan,et al.  Biosurfactants-Types, Sources and Applications , 2015 .

[26]  I. Mnif,et al.  High molecular weight bioemulsifiers, main properties and potential environmental and biomedical applications , 2015, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[27]  He Huang,et al.  Production of surfactin isoforms by Bacillus subtilis BS-37 and its applicability to enhanced oil recovery under laboratory conditions , 2015 .

[28]  Shashwati Ghosh Sachan,et al.  Screening of bioemulsifier-producing micro-organisms isolated from oil-contaminated sites , 2015, Annals of Microbiology.

[29]  O. Sahu,et al.  Phytoremediation of Abandoned Crude Oil Contaminated Drill Sites of Assam with the Aid of a Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacterial Formulation , 2014, International journal of phytoremediation.

[30]  P. Joshi,et al.  Screening and isolation of biosurfactant producing bacteria from petroleum contaminated soil , 2014 .

[31]  Yahya Al-Wahaibi,et al.  Biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis B20 using date molasses and its possible application in enhanced oil recovery. , 2013 .

[32]  C. Syldatk,et al.  Production of Microbial Rhamnolipid by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa MM1011 for Ex Situ Enhanced Oil Recovery , 2013, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology.

[33]  A. Surin,et al.  Glycolipids of Pseudomonas and Rhodococcus oil-degrading bacteria used in bioremediation preparations: Formation and structure , 2013 .

[34]  R. Pons,et al.  The production and physicochemical properties of a biosurfactant mixture obtained from Sphingobacterium detergens. , 2013, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[35]  Huimin Yu,et al.  Characterization of a blend-biosurfactant of glycolipid and lipopeptide produced by Bacillus subtilis TU2 isolated from underground oil-extraction wastewater. , 2013, Journal of microbiology and biotechnology.

[36]  O. Nybroe,et al.  Abundance and diversity of culturable Pseudomonas constitute sensitive indicators for adverse long-term copper impacts in soil , 2013 .

[37]  R. Thavasi,et al.  Evaluation of Screening Methods for the Isolation of Biosurfactant Producing Marine Bacteria , 2013 .

[38]  M. Afzal,et al.  Plant-bacteria partnerships for the remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils. , 2013, Chemosphere.

[39]  Marius Henkel,et al.  Rhamnolipids--next generation surfactants? , 2012, Journal of biotechnology.

[40]  G. Srinikethan,et al.  Production and characterization of biosurfactant produced by a novel Pseudomonas sp. 2B. , 2012, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[41]  R. Thavasi Microbial Biosurfactants: From an Environmental Application Point of View , 2011 .

[42]  L. Rodrigues,et al.  Antimicrobial and anti-adhesive potential of a biosurfactant Rufisan produced by Candida lipolytica UCP 0988. , 2011, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[43]  M. Shavandi,et al.  Emulsification potential of a newly isolated biosurfactant-producing bacterium, Rhodococcus sp. strain TA6. , 2011, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[44]  Swaranjit Singh Cameotra,et al.  Environmental Applications of Biosurfactants: Recent Advances , 2011, International journal of molecular sciences.

[45]  J. Contiero,et al.  Structure, properties and applications of rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa L2-1 from cassava wastewater , 2010 .

[46]  Jo‐Shu Chang,et al.  Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons from contaminated soil. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[47]  J. González-López,et al.  Application of bioemulsifiers in soil oil bioremediation processes. Future prospects. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[48]  Hasan Mehdi,et al.  Investigation of alkane biodegradation using the microtiter plate method and correlation between biofilm formation, biosurfactant production and crude oil biodegradation , 2008 .

[49]  M. Villalobos,et al.  An Improved Gravimetric Method to Determine Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Contaminated Soils , 2008 .

[50]  O. Agbogidi,et al.  Evaluation of Tectona grandis (Linn.) and Gmelina arborea (Roxb.) for Phytoremediation in Crude Oil Contaminated Soils , 2007 .

[51]  in chief George M. Garrity Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology , 1989, Springer New York.