Identifying patterns in students’ scientific argumentation: content analysis through text mining using Latent Dirichlet Allocation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Tversky,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.
[2] Kalina Yacef,et al. Analysis of collaborative writing processes using revision maps and probabilistic topic models , 2013, LAK '13.
[3] Minsu Ha,et al. Assessing Scientific Practices Using Machine-Learning Methods: How Closely Do They Match Clinical Interview Performance? , 2013, Journal of Science Education and Technology.
[4] Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al. Unsupervised modeling for understanding MOOC discussion forums: a learning analytics approach , 2015, LAK.
[5] John L. Nietfeld,et al. Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring , 2009 .
[6] William A. Sandoval,et al. Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .
[7] Gerd Stumme,et al. Semantic resource management for the web: an e-learning application , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.
[8] D. Kuhn. Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .
[9] Amy Pallant,et al. Articulating Uncertainty Attribution as Part of Critical Epistemic Practice of Scientific Argumentation , 2017, CSCL.
[10] Nancy J. Stone,et al. Exploring the Relationship between Calibration and Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .
[11] Xin Chen,et al. "Twitter Archeology" of learning analytics and knowledge conferences , 2015, LAK.
[12] Wu He,et al. Using Data Mining for Predicting Relationships between Online Question Theme and Final Grade , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[13] Libby Gerard,et al. Validation of Automated Scoring of Science Assessments. , 2016 .
[14] Chong Ho Yu,et al. Compatibility between Text Mining and Qualitative Research in the Perspectives of Grounded Theory, Content Analysis, and Reliability , 2011 .
[15] H. Schweingruber,et al. TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .
[16] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .
[17] Semire Dikli,et al. An Overview of Automated Scoring of Essays. , 2006 .
[18] Chong Wang,et al. Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models , 2009, NIPS.
[19] Wanli Xing,et al. Beyond positive and negative emotions: Looking into the role of achievement emotions in discussion forums of MOOCs , 2019, Internet High. Educ..
[20] Shirley Simon,et al. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .
[21] Maria Simosi. Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations , 2003 .
[22] Marlene Scardamalia,et al. Exploring emotional and cognitive dynamics of Knowledge Building in grades 1 and 2 , 2019, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.
[23] Douglas B. Clark,et al. Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality , 2008 .
[24] D. Allchin. Teaching the nature of science through scientific errors , 2012 .
[25] Yuen-Hsien Tseng,et al. Mining concept maps from news stories for measuring civic scientific literacy in media , 2010, Comput. Educ..
[26] Kinshuk,et al. Mining e-Learning domain concept map from academic articles , 2008, Comput. Educ..
[27] Wu He,et al. Using text mining to uncover students' technology-related problems in live video streaming , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[28] Jill Burstein,et al. Automated Essay Scoring : A Cross-disciplinary Perspective , 2003 .
[29] Troy D. Sadler,et al. A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation , 2006 .
[30] Wanli Xing,et al. The effect of sustained vs. faded scaffolding on students' argumentation in ill-structured problem solving , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[31] Philip Bell,et al. Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education , 2008 .
[32] D. S. Guru,et al. Representation and Classification of Text Documents: A Brief Review , 2010 .
[33] Timo Honkela,et al. Text Mining in Qualitative Research , 2009 .
[34] S. Erduran,et al. TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .
[35] Bodong Chen. Visualizing semantic space of online discourse: the knowledge forum case , 2014, LAK '14.
[36] Paul Horwitz,et al. The effects of transformative and non-transformative discourse on individual performance in collaborative-inquiry learning , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[37] Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al. Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..
[38] S. Pryputniewicz,et al. Assessment of uncertainty-infused scientific argumentation , 2014 .
[39] Fu-Ren Lin,et al. Discovering genres of online discussion threads via text mining , 2009, Comput. Educ..
[40] Douglas B. Clark,et al. Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions , 2008 .
[41] Gökhan Akçapinar,et al. How automated feedback through text mining changes plagiaristic behavior in online assignments , 2015, Comput. Educ..
[42] Fei Gao,et al. Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities , 2018, Comput. Educ..
[43] S. Toulmin. The uses of argument , 1960 .
[44] Leema K. Berland,et al. Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .
[45] S. Erduran,et al. Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge , 2008 .
[46] Andreas Hotho,et al. A Brief Survey of Text Mining , 2005, LDV Forum.
[47] Ngss Lead States. Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .
[48] William A. Sandoval,et al. The Quality of Students' Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations , 2005 .
[49] Fan Zhang,et al. Annotation and Classification of Argumentative Writing Revisions , 2015, BEA@NAACL-HLT.
[50] John Dunlosky,et al. Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention , 2012 .
[51] Helen R. Quinn,et al. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .
[52] Jui-long Hung,et al. Trends of e-learning research from 2000 to 2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[53] M. Baker,et al. Computer-Mediated Epistemic Dialogue: Explanation and Argumentation as Vehicles for Understanding Scientific Notions , 2002 .