Human vibrotactile frequency discriminative capacity after adaptation to 25 Hz or 200 Hz stimulation

A two-interval forced-choice (2-IFC) tracking procedure was used to evaluate the effects of a 15-s pre-exposure to either 25 Hz or 200 Hz stimulation ("25 Hz or 200 Hz adaptation") on human vibrotactile frequency discrimination threshold (frequency DL/Weber fraction). Three subjects were studied. All stimuli (standard and comparison) were delivered to a central location on the thenar eminence of the hand. The frequency DL/Weber fraction was determined for each subject under the following conditions: (1) no recent prior exposure to vibrotactile stimulation ("unadapted"); (2) after 15 s adaptation to 25 Hz stimulation; and (3) after 15 s adaptation to 200 Hz stimulation. The results demonstrate that the effects of frequency of adaptation on frequency discriminative capacity when the standard stimulus is 25 Hz are not the same as when the standard stimulus is 200 Hz. The differential changes in the capacity of subjects to discriminate frequency of cutaneous flutter (10-50 Hz) or vibratory (>200 Hz) stimulation that occur subsequent to a 15-s exposure of the thenar to 25 Hz or 200 Hz stimulation are proposed to reflect frequency-specific, adaptation-induced modification of the response of contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (SI and SII) to skin mechanoreceptor afferent drive.

[1]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On the Effect of Practice and Motivation on the Threshold of Audibility , 1958 .

[2]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Hairy skin: psychophysical channels and their physiological substrates. , 1994, Somatosensory & motor research.

[3]  O. Franzén,et al.  Somesthesis and the Neurobiology of the Somatosensory Cortex , 1996, Advances in Life Sciences.

[4]  R. Romo,et al.  Frequency discrimination in the sense of flutter: psychophysical measurements correlated with postcentral events in behaving monkeys , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  D. Ferrington,et al.  Human tactile detection thresholds: modification by inputs from specific tactile receptor classes , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Mechanisms underlying somatosensory cortical dynamics: I. In vivo studies. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances amplitude discrimination. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Intraneural microstimulation in man. Its relation to specificity of tactile sensations. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  S J Bensmaïa,et al.  Complex tactile waveform discrimination. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[12]  D. Ferrington,et al.  Differential contributions to coding of cutaneous vibratory information by cortical somatosensory areas I and II. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Mark Hollins,et al.  Vebrotactile adaptation of a RA system: A psychophysical analysis , 1996 .

[14]  B. Berglund,et al.  Adaptation and Recovery in Vibrotactile Perception , 1970, Perceptual and motor skills.

[15]  S. J. Bolanowski,et al.  Some characteristics of tactile channels , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  D. Burke,et al.  Long-lasting depression of central synaptic transmission following prolonged high-frequency stimulation of cutaneous afferents: a mechanism for post-vibratory hypaesthesia. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Response of anterior parietal cortex to cutaneous flutter versus vibration. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  E. Ziegel.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics , 1994 .

[19]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Effects of high-frequency skin stimulation on SI cortex: mechanisms and functional implications. , 2005, Somatosensory & motor research.

[20]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Imaging the Responding Neuronal Population with 14c-2-Deoxyglucose: The Somatosensory Cerebral Cortical Signature of a Tactile Stimulus , 1984 .

[21]  W.J.R. Dunseath,et al.  fMRI of the Responses to Vibratory Stimulation of Digit Tips , 2000, NeuroImage.

[22]  J. Szentágothai,et al.  Brain Research , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[23]  H. Burton,et al.  Vibrotactile stimulus order effects in somatosensory cortical areas of rhesus monkeys. , 1998, Somatosensory & motor research.

[24]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Time-dependence of SI RA neuron response to cutaneous flutter stimulation , 2003, Somatosensory & motor research.

[25]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  M. Hollins,et al.  Adaptation-induced enhancement of vibrotactile amplitude discrimination: the role of adapting frequency. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Mechanisms underlying somatosensory cortical dynamics: II. In vitro studies. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile intensity and frequency information in the Pacinian system: A psychophysical model , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  M. Hollins,et al.  Pacinian representations of fine surface texture , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys. Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. Ochoa,et al.  Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Stability of rapidly adapting afferent entrainment vs responsivity. , 2000, Somatosensory & motor research.

[33]  M. Rowe,et al.  Neural mechanisms in vibrotactile adaptation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation on the face , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Responses of contralateral SI and SII in cat to same-site cutaneous flutter versus vibration. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[37]  L. Cohen,et al.  Studies in Vibratory Sensibility , 1938 .

[38]  G. D. Goff.  Differential discrimination of frequency of cutaneous mechanical vibration. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  C. Wedell,et al.  Fatigue of the vibratory sense , 1938 .

[41]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances frequency discrimination. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Vibrotactile forward masking: evidence for channel independence. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  R H LaMotte,et al.  Disorders in somesthesis following lesions of parietal lobe. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Selective adaptation of vibrotactile thresholds. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[45]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Frequency-dependent response of SI RA-class neurons to vibrotactile stimulation of the receptive field. , 2001, Somatosensory & motor research.