A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order

Abstract Early on during word recognition, letter positions are not accurately coded. Evidence for this comes from transposed-letter (TL) priming effects, in which letter strings generated by transposing two adjacent letters (e.g., jugde ) produce large priming effects, more than primes with the letters replaced in the corresponding position (e.g., junpe ). Dominant accounts of TL priming effect such as the Open Bigrams model ( Grainger & van Heuven, 2003; Whitney & Cornelissen, 2008 ) and the SOLAR model ( Davis & Bowers, 2006 ) explain this effect by proposing a higher level of representation than individual letter identities in which letter position is not coded accurately. An alternative to this is to assume that position coding is noisy (e.g., Gomez, Ratcliff, & Perea, 2008 ). We propose an extension to the Bayesian Reader ( Norris, 2006 ) that incorporates letter position noise during sampling from perceptual input. This model predicts “leakage” of letter identity to nearby positions, which is not expected from models incorporating alternative position coding schemes. We report three masked priming experiments testing predictions from this model.

[1]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[2]  Sally Andrews,et al.  From inkmarks to ideas : current issues in lexical processing , 2006 .

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[4]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Putting it all together: a unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions. , 2009, Psychological review.

[5]  K. Forster,et al.  Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[6]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? , 1987 .

[7]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[8]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[9]  C. Davis Orthographic input coding: A review of behavioural evidence and current models , 2010 .

[10]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Chris Davis,et al.  The role of neighbourhood density in transposed-letter priming , 2009 .

[12]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: insights from masked priming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. , 2001 .

[16]  M. Mozer Types and tokens in visual letter perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: The mental lexicon , 1988 .

[19]  Piers L. Cornelissen,et al.  Letter‐position encoding and dyslexia , 2005 .

[20]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Masked form priming with extreme transposition , 2008 .

[21]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[23]  R S Berndt,et al.  A new model of letter string encoding: simulating right neglect dyslexia. , 1999, Progress in brain research.

[24]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[25]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[26]  M. Sigman,et al.  The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  K. Forster,et al.  The mechanics of masked priming , 2003 .

[28]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Priming of Abstract Letter Identities in the Letter Match Task , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[30]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[31]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .

[32]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  N. Kanwisher Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation , 1987, Cognition.

[34]  R. Ratcliff A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. , 1981 .

[35]  S. Lupker,et al.  Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Carol Whitney,et al.  Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding , 2008, Brain and Language.

[37]  S. Lupker,et al.  Sandwich priming: a method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  G. Logan The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. , 1996, Psychological review.

[39]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  K I Forster,et al.  The Pros and Cons of Masked Priming , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[41]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[42]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[43]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.

[44]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Does “whole-word shape” play a role in visual word recognition? , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[46]  D. Balota,et al.  Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[47]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.