Performance of HPV DNA testing with hybrid capture 2 in triaging women with minor cervical cytologic abnormalities (ASC-US/LSIL) in Northern Thailand.

BACKGROUND Minor cervical cytologic abnormalities include atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Approximately 10-20% of women with minor cytologic abnormalities have histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial or worse lesions (HSIL+). In Thailand, women with minor cytologic abnormalities have a relatively high risk of cervical cancer, and referral for colposcopy has been suggested. A triage test is useful in the selection of women at risk for histologic HSIL+ to reduce the colposcopy burden. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of high-risk HPV DNA test in triage of women with minor cytologic abnormalities in northern Thailand. MATERIALS AND METHODS All women with ASC-US/LSIL cytology who were referred to our colposcopy clinic from October 2010 to February 2014 were included. HPV DNA testing was performed using Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2). All patients received colposcopic examination. Accuracy values of HC2 in predicting the presence of histologic HSIL+ were calculated. RESULTS There were 238 women in this study (121 ASC-US and 117 LSIL). The HC2 positivity rate was significantly higher in the LSIL group than in ASC-US group (74.8% versus 41.0%, p<0.001). Histologic HSIL+ was detected in 9 women (7.4%) in the ASC-US group and 16 women (13.7%) in the LSIL group (p=0.141). There was no histologic HSIL+ detected among HC2-negative cases (sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%). The performance of HC2 triage was highest among women aged >50 years with ASC-US cytology. An increase in the cut-off threshold for positive HC2 resulted in a substantial decrease of sensitivity and negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS HPV DNA testing with HC2 shows very high sensitivity and negative predictive value in triage of women with minor cervical cytologic abnormalities in northern Thailand. An increase of the cut-off threshold for HC2 triage is not recommended in this region.

[1]  P. Suprasert,et al.  Cytopathology: Poster#087 POPULATION-BASED CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING USING HIGH-RISK HPV DNA TEST AND LIQUID-BASED CYTOLOGY IN NORTHERN THAILAND , 2014 .

[2]  J. Ordi,et al.  Usefulness of p16/Ki67 immunostaining in the triage of women referred to colposcopy , 2014, Cancer cytopathology.

[3]  E. Weiderpass,et al.  Triage of HR-HPV Positive Women with Minor Cytological Abnormalities: A Comparison of mRNA Testing, HPV DNA Testing, and Repeat Cytology Using a 4-Year Follow-Up of a Population-Based Study , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Paolo Giorgi-Rossi,et al.  Triage of women with minor abnormal cervical cytology: Meta‐analysis of the accuracy of an assay targeting messenger ribonucleic acid of 5 high‐risk human papillomavirus types , 2014, Cancer cytopathology.

[5]  N. Kitkumthorn,et al.  CCNA1 promoter methylation: a potential marker for grading Papanicolaou smear cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[6]  G. Aslan,et al.  Human papillomavirus genotype distribution and E6/E7 oncogene expression in Turkish women with cervical cytological findings. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[7]  H. Kuramoto,et al.  Performance of p16INK4a/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry for identifying CIN2+ in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion specimens: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study , 2014, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  J. Srisomboon,et al.  Histopathological outcomes of women with abnormal cervical cytology: a review of literature in Thailand. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[9]  Komsun Suwannarurk,et al.  Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[10]  S. Sangrajrang,et al.  Prevalence of high risk human papillomavirus infection with different cervical cytological features among women undergoing health examination at the National Cancer Institute, Thailand. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[11]  N. Kitkumthorn,et al.  CCNA 1 Promoter Methylation : a Potential Marker for Grading Papanicolaou Smear Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions , 2014 .

[12]  K. Sigurdsson Is a liquid‐based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear? , 2013, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[13]  K. Cuschieri,et al.  Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions , 2013, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[14]  M. Schiffman,et al.  Five-Year Risks of CIN 3+ and Cervical Cancer Among Women With HPV Testing of ASC-US Pap Results , 2013, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[15]  Diane Solomon,et al.  2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  C. Lursinsap,et al.  Clinical prediction based on HPV DNA testing by hybrid capture 2 (HC2) in combination with liquid-based cytology (LBC). , 2013, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[17]  K. Nam,et al.  Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Causes Larger Colposcopic Lesions Than Other HPV Types in Patients With Grade 3 Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia , 2013, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[18]  Jack Cuzick,et al.  The APTIMA HPV assay versus the hybrid capture 2 test in triage of women with ASC‐US or LSIL cervical cytology: A meta‐analysis of the diagnostic accuracy , 2013, International journal of cancer.

[19]  Y. Qiao,et al.  Epidemiological features of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection among women living in Mainland China. , 2013, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[20]  H. Kitchener,et al.  HPV testing as a triage for borderline or mild dyskaryosis on cervical cytology: results from the Sentinel Sites study , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  S. Tangjitgamol,et al.  Visual inspection with acetic acid for detection of high grade lesion in atypical squamous cells and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions from cervical Pap smear , 2011, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[22]  M. Evans,et al.  Combined p16INK4a and human papillomavirus testing improves the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN II-III) in Thai patients with low-grade cytological abnormalities. , 2011, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[23]  C. Mathers,et al.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[24]  P. Suprasert,et al.  High‐grade histologic lesions in women with low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology from a region of Thailand with a high incidence of cervical cancer , 2010, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[25]  J. Peto,et al.  Optimal Threshold for a Positive Hybrid Capture 2 Test for Detection of Human Papillomavirus: Data from the ARTISTIC Trial , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[26]  J. Dillner,et al.  Triage of women with equivocal or low-grade cervical cytology results: a meta-analysis of the HPV test positivity rate , 2009, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[27]  P. Suprasert,et al.  Clinical relevance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance by the 2001 bethesda system: experience from a cervical cancer high incidence region. , 2008, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[28]  Diane Solomon,et al.  Risk assessment to guide the prevention of cervical cancer. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  J. Cuzick,et al.  HPV triage for low grade (L-SIL) cytology is appropriate for women over 35 in mass cervical cancer screening using liquid based cytology. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[30]  S. Niruthisard,et al.  Role of human papillomavirus DNA testing in management of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance , 2004, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[31]  Joan L. Walker A randomized trial on the management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology interpretations. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  Mark Sherman,et al.  The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. , 2002, JAMA.