The Mere Exposure Effect Is Differentially Sensitive to Different Judgment Tasks

The mere exposure effect is the increase in positive affect that results from the repeated exposure to previously novel stimuli. We sought to determine if judgments other than affective preference could reliably produce a mere exposure effect for two-dimensional random shapes. In two experiments, we found that brighter and darker judgments did not differentiate target from distracter shapes, liking judgments led to target selection greater than chance, and disliking judgments led to distracter selection greater than chance. These results for brighter, darker, and liking judgments were obtained regardless of whether shape recognition was greater (Experiment 1) or not greater (Experiment 2) than chance. Effects of prior exposure to novel shapes were reliably observed only for affective judgment tasks. These results are inconsistent with general predictions made by the nonspecific activation hypothesis, but not the affective primacy or perceptual fluency hypotheses which were discussed in terms of cognitive neuroscience research.

[1]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of Emotions , 1993 .

[2]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Additivity of nonconscious affect: combined effects of priming and exposure. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  R. Bauer,et al.  Implicit learning of new faces in prosopagnosia: An application of the mere-exposure paradigm , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[5]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[6]  Richard S. Lazarus,et al.  On the Primacy of Cognition. , 1984 .

[7]  John G. Seamon,et al.  The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. , 1995 .

[8]  N. Cohen,et al.  The impaired learning of semantic knowledge following bilateral medial temporal-lobe resection , 1988, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  A. Reber.  An evolutionary context for the cognitive unconscious , 1992 .

[10]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[12]  Robert F. Bornstein,et al.  The Generalizability of Subliminal Mere Exposure Effects: Influence of Stimuli Perceived Without Awareness on Social Behavior , 1987 .

[13]  S. Corkin,et al.  Intact priming of patterns despite impaired memory , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  R. Zajonc.  On the primacy of affect. , 1984 .

[15]  N. Brody,et al.  Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  J. Seamon,et al.  A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[17]  J M VANDERPLAS,et al.  The association value of random shapes. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: effects of size and reflection. , 1992 .

[19]  D. Schacter.  Implicit memory: History and current status. , 1987 .

[20]  G. Mandler.  Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[21]  George Mandler,et al.  Nonspecific Effects of Exposure on Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 1987 .

[22]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[23]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Comparing Direct (Explicit) and Indirect (Implicit) Measures to Study Unconscious Memory , 1991 .

[24]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention. , 1994 .

[25]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Chapter 12 – THE AMYGDALA: SENSORY GATEWAY TO THE EMOTIONS , 1986 .

[26]  John G. Seamon,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality , 1983 .

[27]  R. Bauer,et al.  Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: A neuropsychological application of the guilty knowledge test , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Do alcoholic Korsakoff's syndrome patients acquire affective reactions? , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  M. Gazzaniga.  Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience , 1984, Springer US.

[30]  A. Reber.  The cognitive unconscious: An evolutionary perspective , 1992, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  G. Mandler,et al.  Knowing and liking , 1983 .

[32]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Brain regions associated with retrieval of structurally coherent visual information , 1995, Nature.

[33]  D. Kelly,et al.  Contemporary Indications for Psychosurgery , 1981, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[34]  L. Cooper,et al.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions , 1990 .

[35]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  A contribution to the anatomical basis of thalamic amnesia. , 1985, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  R. M. Bauer.  Visual hypoemotionality as a symptom of visual-limbic disconnection in man. , 1982, Archives of neurology.

[37]  Suzanne Corkin,et al.  ACQUISITION OF MOTOR SKILL AFTER BILATERAL MEDIAL TEMPORAL-LOBE EXCISION , 1968 .

[38]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Preferences need no inferences?: The cognitive basis of unconscious mere exposure effects. , 1994 .

[39]  F M Miezin,et al.  Activation of the hippocampus in normal humans: a functional anatomical study of memory. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  N. Brody,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test , 1983 .

[41]  A. Harrison,et al.  Response competition, frequency, exploratory behavior, and liking. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Andrew R. Mayes,et al.  Location of Lesions in Korsakoff's Syndrome: Neuropsychological and Neuropathological Data on Two Patients , 1988, Cortex.

[43]  James L. McGaugh,et al.  The amygdala and emotional memory , 1995, Nature.

[44]  L. Squire.  Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[45]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Memory influences subjective experience: Noise judgments. , 1988 .

[46]  W. Wilson,et al.  Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning. , 1979 .

[47]  Joseph E LeDoux.  Cognition and emotion: Processing functions and brain systems , 1984 .

[48]  L. Squire,et al.  Independence of memory functions and emotional behavior: Separate contributions of the hippocampal formation and the amygdala , 1991, Hippocampus.

[49]  L. Cermak,et al.  Alcoholic Korsakoff's Syndrome: An Information-Processing Approach to Amnesia , 1980 .

[50]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  B. Milner,et al.  Further analysis of the hippocampal amnesic syndrome: 14-year follow-up study of H.M.☆ , 1968 .

[52]  C. W. Hughes.  Emotion: Theory, Research and Experience , 1982 .

[53]  G. Bonanno,et al.  Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes. , 1986, The American journal of psychology.

[54]  D. Stang.  Effects of "mere exposure" on learning and affect. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  JANOS KURUCZ,et al.  Prosopo‐Affective Agnosia Associated with Chronic Organic Brain Syndrome , 1979, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[56]  M. Oscar-Berman.  Neuropsychological consequences of long-term chronic alcoholism. , 1980, American scientist.

[57]  Michael D. Kopelman,et al.  Handbook of memory disorders , 1995 .

[58]  S. Corkin.  Lasting Consequences of Bilateral Medial Temporal Lobectomy: Clinical Course and Experimental Findings in H.M. , 1984 .

[59]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[60]  D. Schacter.  Understanding implicit memory. A cognitive neuroscience approach. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[61]  M W Matlin,et al.  Response competition, recognition, and affect. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.