Functions of Root Canal Sealers- A Review

BACKGROUND Endodontic therapy is a treatment for the diseased pulp of a tooth. It will result in the removal of infection and the preservation from further microbial invasion. The principle constituents of an endodontic filling are- a core material “gutta percha” and “endodontic sealers”. All the current obturating techniques make use of the sealer to augment the seal endodontic filling material. It fills the space between canals. Endodontic sealer fills the space between the material as well as root dentin. Different types of sealers are available (resin sealers, ZOE sealers, mineral trioxide aggregate sealer, bio-ceramic containing sealers, glass ionomer containing sealer, calcium hydroxide containing sealer). Root canal sealers have different functions-antibacterial, lubricant for core material, to increase radio-opacity of core or as a filling material. Different types of microorganisms as well as microbial products cause pulpal as well as peri-radicular diseases. Microorganisms persist in the canal due to poor irrigation. We wanted to evaluate the various functions of different endodontic sealers. The perfect apical seal obtained by use of sealers is one which is stable and non-irritating in nature. It should also give us a smoother seal. Biocompatibility of root canal sealer has importance as it is placed directly in contact with the living tissue. Response of dental tissue help in the final outcome of successful endodontic treatment. Bond strength between canal walls exhibit through micromechanical retention. It helps in preventing the dislodgement of filling material. It ultimately helps in maintenance of interface between filling material and sealers. Push out test is the process to assess bond strength among filling material and sealers. Endodontic sealer has sufficient amount of radiopacity so that it can be clearly visualised among material and adjacent anatomical structures.

[1]  K. Orhan,et al.  Evaluation of the sealing ability of different root canal sealers: a combined SEM and micro-CT study , 2018, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[2]  Marco Colombo,et al.  Antibacterial activity of different root canal sealers against Enterococcus faecalis , 2017, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[3]  Nagesh Bolla,et al.  Comparison of bond strength of different endodontic sealers to root dentin: An in vitro push-out test , 2016, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[4]  P. Jain,et al.  Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Root Canal Sealers- An invitro Study. , 2016, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[5]  J. Duhan,et al.  Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of three herbal irrigants in reducing intracanal E. faecalis populations: An in vitro study , 2016, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[6]  V. Sikri,et al.  An ex vivo evaluation of the sealing ability of polydimethylsiloxane-based root canal sealers. , 2014, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[7]  M. Inci,et al.  Antifungal activity of several root canal sealers against Candida albicans , 2013, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[8]  M. Baliga,et al.  Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials along with aloevera used in primary teeth: a microbiological study. , 2013, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[9]  Qiang Zhu,et al.  Apical and root canal space sealing abilities of resin and glass ionomer-based root canal obturation systems. , 2013, The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association.

[10]  M. Tanomaru-Filho,et al.  Push-out bond strength of Calcium hydroxide and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate based sealers to root canal dentin , 2012 .

[11]  F. Diemer,et al.  Sealer penetration and adaptation in the dentinal tubules: a scanning electron microscopic study. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[12]  F. A. Santos,et al.  Biocompatibility of four root canal sealers: a histopathological evaluation in rat subcutaneous connective tissue. , 2011, Brazilian dental journal.

[13]  M. Gorduysus,et al.  Evaluation of the radiopacity of different root canal sealers. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[14]  M. Eghbal,et al.  Coronal and apical sealing ability of a new endodontic cement , 2009, Iranian endodontic journal.

[15]  J. Wataha,et al.  Long-term sealing ability of Pulp Canal Sealer, AH-Plus, GuttaFlow and Epiphany. , 2008, International endodontic journal.

[16]  M. Tanomaru-Filho,et al.  Evaluation of the radiopacity of calcium hydroxide- and glass-ionomer-based root canal sealers. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[17]  A. Heckmann,et al.  Structural and functional fatigue of NiTi shape memory alloys , 2004 .

[18]  M. Hülsmann,et al.  Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[19]  M. Tagger,et al.  Radiopacity of endodontic sealers: development of a new method for direct measurement. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  E Schäfer,et al.  Solubility of root-canal sealers in water and artificial saliva. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[21]  D. Pashley,et al.  Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[22]  I. Heling,et al.  The antimicrobial effect within dentinal tubules of four root canal sealers. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  S. Yguel-Henry,et al.  High precision, simulated cutting efficiency measurement of endodontic root canal instruments: influence of file configuration and lubrication. , 1990, Journal of endodontics.

[24]  R. Walton,et al.  Endodontics: Principles and Practice , 1989 .