Deep phenotyping classical galactosemia: clinical outcomes and biochemical markers

Abstract Early diagnosis and dietary treatment do not prevent long-term complications, which mostly affect the central nervous system in classical galactosemia patients. The clinical outcome of patients is highly variable, and there is an urgent need for prognostic biomarkers. The aim of this study was first to increase knowledge on the natural history of classical galactosemia by studying a cohort of patients with varying geno- and phenotypes and second to study the association between clinical outcomes and two possible prognostic biomarkers. In addition, the association between abnormalities on brain MRI and clinical outcomes was investigated. Classical galactosemia patients visiting the galactosemia expertise outpatient clinic of the Amsterdam University Medical Centre were evaluated according to the International Classical Galactosemia guideline with the addition of an examination by a neurologist, serum immunoglobulin G N-glycan profiling and a brain MRI. The biomarkers of interest were galactose-1-phosphate levels and N-glycan profiles, and the clinical outcomes studied were intellectual outcome and the presence or absence of movement disorders and/or primary ovarian insufficiency. Data of 56 classical galactosemia patients are reported. The intellectual outcome ranged from 45 to 103 (mean 77 ± 14) and was <85 in 62%. Movement disorders were found in 17 (47%) of the 36 tested patients. In females aged 12 years and older, primary ovarian insufficiency was diagnosed in 12 (71%) of the 17 patients. Significant differences in N-glycan peaks were found between controls and patients. However, no significant differences in either N-glycans or galactose-1-phosphate levels were found between patients with a poor (intellectual outcome < 85) and normal intellectual outcome (intellectual outcome ≥ 85), and with or without movement disorders or primary ovarian insufficiency. The variant patients detected by newborn screening, with previously unknown geno- and phenotypes and currently no long-term complications, demonstrated significantly lower galactose-1-phospate levels than classical patients (P < 0.0005). Qualitative analysis of the MRI’s demonstrated brain abnormalities in 18 of the 21 patients, more severely in patients with a lower intellectual outcome and/or with movement disorders. This study demonstrates a large variability in clinical outcome, which varies from a below average intelligence, movement disorders and in females primary ovarian insufficiency to a normal clinical outcome. In our cohort of classical galactosemia patients, galactose-1-phosphate levels and N-glycan variations were not associated with clinical outcomes, but galactose-1-phosphate levels did differentiate between classical and variant patients detected by newborn screening. The correlation between brain abnormalities and clinical outcome should be further investigated by quantitative analysis of the MR images. The variability in clinical outcome necessitates individual and standardized evaluation of all classical galactosemia patients.

[1]  Merel E. Hermans,et al.  Classical galactosemia: neuropsychological and psychosocial functioning beyond intellectual abilities , 2020, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[2]  S. Waisbren,et al.  The natural history of classic galactosemia: lessons from the GalNet registry , 2019, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[3]  R. Lachmann,et al.  Movement disorders and nonmotor neuropsychological symptoms in children and adults with classical galactosemia , 2019, Journal of inherited metabolic disease.

[4]  I. Knerr,et al.  Fertility in classical galactosaemia, a study of N-glycan, hormonal and inflammatory gene interactions , 2018, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases.

[5]  P. Rudd,et al.  Validation of an automated ultraperformance liquid chromatography IgG N-glycan analytical method applicable to classical galactosaemia , 2018, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[6]  T. Yuzyuk,et al.  Biochemical changes and clinical outcomes in 34 patients with classic galactosemia , 2018, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[7]  T. Derks,et al.  Nine years of newborn screening for classical galactosemia in the Netherlands: Effectiveness of screening methods, and identification of patients with previously unreported phenotypes. , 2017, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism.

[8]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  International clinical guideline for the management of classical galactosemia: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up , 2016, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[9]  P. Rudd,et al.  Classical galactosaemia: novel insights in IgG N-glycosylation and N-glycan biosynthesis , 2016, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[10]  P. Rudd,et al.  IgG N-Glycosylation Galactose Incorporation Ratios for the Monitoring of Classical Galactosaemia. , 2015, JIMD reports.

[11]  P. Rudd,et al.  Effects of temporary low-dose galactose supplements in children aged 5–12 y with classical galactosemia: a pilot study , 2015, Pediatric Research.

[12]  Hui Zhang,et al.  White matter microstructure pathology in classic galactosemia revealed by neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging , 2014, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[13]  Pauline M Rudd,et al.  N-glycan abnormalities in children with galactosemia. , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[14]  Pauline M Rudd,et al.  Automated, high-throughput IgG-antibody glycoprofiling platform. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  I. Parees,et al.  Movement Disorders in Adult Patients With Classical Galactosemia , 2013, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[16]  I. Knerr,et al.  Classical Galactosaemia in Ireland: incidence, complications and outcomes of treatment , 2013, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[17]  N. Pivac,et al.  Changes in plasma and IgG N-glycome during childhood and adolescence. , 2012, Glycobiology.

[18]  R. Green,et al.  The adult galactosemic phenotype , 2012, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[19]  Jodie L. Abrahams,et al.  IgG N-glycans as potential biomarkers for determining galactose tolerance in Classical Galactosaemia. , 2012, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[20]  N. Hastie,et al.  High Throughput Isolation and Glycosylation Analysis of IgG–Variability and Heritability of the IgG Glycome in Three Isolated Human Populations , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[21]  F. Kolb,et al.  The human cerebellum contributes to motor, emotional and cognitive associative learning. A review , 2010, Cortex.

[22]  P. Rudd,et al.  Galactosemia, a Single Gene Disorder With Epigenetic Consequences , 2010, Pediatric Research.

[23]  G. Lauc,et al.  Stability of N-glycan profiles in human plasma. , 2009, Glycobiology.

[24]  I. Rudan,et al.  Variability, heritability and environmental determinants of human plasma N-glycome. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[25]  D. Lambert,et al.  Outcomes of siblings with classical galactosemia. , 2009, The Journal of pediatrics.

[26]  A. Bosch Classical galactosaemia revisited , 2006, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[27]  L. Elsas,et al.  GALT deficiency causes UDP-hexose deficit in human galactosemic cells. , 2003, Glycobiology.

[28]  L. Elsas,et al.  Verbal Dyspraxia and Galactosemia , 2003, Pediatric Research.

[29]  C. Scriver,et al.  The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease, 8th Edition 2001 , 2001, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[30]  M. Rapoport,et al.  The role of the cerebellum in cognition and behavior: a selective review. , 2000, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[31]  L. Elsas,et al.  Outcomes analysis of verbal dyspraxia in classic galactosemia , 2000, Genetics in Medicine.

[32]  J. Leonard,et al.  Recommendations for the management of galactosaemia , 1999, Archives of disease in childhood.

[33]  G. Berry,et al.  Endogenous synthesis of galactose in normal men and patients with hereditary galactosaemia , 1995, The Lancet.

[34]  G. Donnell,et al.  Long-term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases , 1990, Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease.

[35]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders , 1988 .

[36]  C. Marsden,et al.  Validity and reliability of a rating scale for the primary torsion dystonias , 1985, Neurology.

[37]  Y. Shin-Bühring,et al.  A method for galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase assay and the separation of its isozymes by DEAE-cellulose column chromatography. , 1976, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[38]  R. Gitzelmann Estimation of galactose-I-phosphate in erythrocytes: a rapid and simple enzymatic method. , 1969, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[39]  S. Waisbren,et al.  Bone Health in Classic Galactosemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2017, JIMD reports.

[40]  J. Holton Effects of galactosemia in utero , 2005, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[41]  L. Elsas,et al.  A prevalent mutation for galactosemia among black Americans. , 1996, The Journal of pediatrics.