Development of Polydimethylsiloxane Substrates with Tunable Elastic Modulus to Study Cell Mechanobiology in Muscle and Nerve

Mechanics is an important component in the regulation of cell shape, proliferation, migration and differentiation during normal homeostasis and disease states. Biomaterials that match the elastic modulus of soft tissues have been effective for studying this cell mechanobiology, but improvements are needed in order to investigate a wider range of physicochemical properties in a controlled manner. We hypothesized that polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) blends could be used as the basis of a tunable system where the elastic modulus could be adjusted to match most types of soft tissue. To test this we formulated blends of two commercially available PDMS types, Sylgard 527 and Sylgard 184, which enabled us to fabricate substrates with an elastic modulus anywhere from 5 kPa up to 1.72 MPa. This is a three order-of-magnitude range of tunability, exceeding what is possible with other hydrogel and PDMS systems. Uniquely, the elastic modulus can be controlled independently of other materials properties including surface roughness, surface energy and the ability to functionalize the surface by protein adsorption and microcontact printing. For biological validation, PC12 (neuronal inducible-pheochromocytoma cell line) and C2C12 (muscle cell line) were used to demonstrate that these PDMS formulations support cell attachment and growth and that these substrates can be used to probe the mechanosensitivity of various cellular processes including neurite extension and muscle differentiation.

[1]  Sean P Sheehy,et al.  Controlling the contractile strength of engineered cardiac muscle by hierarchal tissue architecture. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[2]  Jianping Fu,et al.  UV-modulated substrate rigidity for multiscale study of mechanoresponsive cellular behaviors. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[3]  F. Baaijens,et al.  Influence of substrate stiffness on circulating progenitor cell fate. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  D. Hammer,et al.  Biochemical and mechanical extracellular matrix properties dictate mammary epithelial cell motility and assembly , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[5]  L. P. Tan,et al.  A novel and simple microcontact printing technique for tacky, soft substrates and/or complex surfaces in soft tissue engineering. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[6]  E. Vogler,et al.  Protein adsorption in three dimensions. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[7]  Peng-Yuan Wang,et al.  Screening of rat mesenchymal stem cell behaviour on polydimethylsiloxane stiffness gradients. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[8]  A. Lendlein,et al.  Viability, Morphology and Function of Primary Endothelial Cells on Poly(n-Butyl Acrylate) Networks Having Elastic Moduli Comparable to Arteries , 2012, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[9]  David L Kaplan,et al.  The influence of elasticity and surface roughness on myogenic and osteogenic-differentiation of cells on silk-elastin biomaterials. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[10]  M. LaPlaca,et al.  Variations in rigidity and ligand density influence neuronal response in methylcellulose-laminin hydrogels. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  The influence of scaffold elasticity on germ layer specification of human embryonic stem cells. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[12]  A. Groisman,et al.  Measurements of Elastic Moduli of Silicone Gel Substrates with a Microfluidic Device , 2011, PloS one.

[13]  T. Kurokawa,et al.  Long-term in situ observation of barnacle growth on soft substrates with different elasticity and wettability , 2011 .

[14]  Christian Franck,et al.  A Possible Role for Integrin Signaling in Diffuse Axonal Injury , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  Elliot L. Botvinick,et al.  Concentration Independent Modulation of Local Micromechanics in a Fibrin Gel , 2011, PloS one.

[16]  Jess G. Snedeker,et al.  A novel method for assessing adherent single-cell stiffness in tension: design and testing of a substrate-based live cell functional imaging device , 2011, Biomedical microdevices.

[17]  D. Gourdon,et al.  Adipose progenitor cells increase fibronectin matrix strain and unfolding in breast tumors , 2011, Physical biology.

[18]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  Interaction between electrical stimulation, protein coating and matrix elasticity: a complex effect on muscle fibre maturation , 2011, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[19]  Ning Wang,et al.  Soft Substrates Promote Homogeneous Self-Renewal of Embryonic Stem Cells via Downregulating Cell-Matrix Tractions , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  Q. Liao,et al.  A hybrid model to determine mechanical properties of soft polymers by nanoindentation , 2010 .

[21]  M. Kurisawa,et al.  The role of stiffness of gelatin-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid hydrogels formed by enzyme-mediated crosslinking on the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[22]  C. Ronchi,et al.  Microtubule dysfunction precedes transport impairment and mitochondria damage in MPP+‐induced neurodegeneration , 2010, Journal of neurochemistry.

[23]  S. Thrun,et al.  Substrate Elasticity Regulates Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Culture , 2010, Science.

[24]  D. Khang,et al.  Hydrophobically recovered and contact printed siloxane oligomers for general-purpose surface patterning. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[25]  Kevin Kit Parker,et al.  Surface-initiated assembly of protein nanofabrics. , 2010, Nano letters.

[26]  R. Carrier,et al.  Chemical and physical modifications to poly(dimethylsiloxane) surfaces affect adhesion of Caco-2 cells. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[27]  Caterina Minelli,et al.  Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. , 2009, European cells & materials.

[28]  F. Guilak,et al.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[29]  Jurriaan Huskens,et al.  Microcontact Printing: Limitations and Achievements , 2009 .

[30]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Aligned Cell Sheets Grown on Thermo‐Responsive Substrates with Microcontact Printed Protein Patterns , 2009 .

[31]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[32]  Essential environmental cues from the satellite cell niche: optimizing proliferation and differentiation. , 2009, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[33]  F. Schneider,et al.  Process and material properties of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) for Optical MEMS , 2009 .

[34]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: The force journey of a tumor cell , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[35]  R. Steward,et al.  Probing cell structure by controlling the mechanical environment with cell-substrate interactions. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating , 2008, Journal of Cell Science.

[37]  D. Boettiger,et al.  Biomimetic carbohydrate substrates of tunable properties using immobilized dextran hydrogels. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[38]  Bernard Yurke,et al.  Neurite Outgrowth on a DNA Crosslinked Hydrogel with Tunable Stiffnesses , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  P. Tracqui,et al.  Optimization of poly-di-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) substrates for studying cellular adhesion and motility , 2008 .

[40]  J. Ohayon,et al.  The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[41]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Force-Induced Unfolding of Fibronectin in the Extracellular Matrix of Living Cells , 2007, PLoS biology.

[42]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Muscular Thin Films for Building Actuators and Powering Devices , 2007, Science.

[43]  W. Halfter,et al.  Biomechanical properties of native basement membranes , 2007, The FEBS journal.

[44]  Joyce Y Wong,et al.  Neurite outgrowth and branching of PC12 cells on very soft substrates sharply decreases below a threshold of substrate rigidity , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[45]  A. Banham,et al.  FMIP controls the adipocyte lineage commitment of C2C12 cells by downmodulation of C/EBPalpha , 2007, Oncogene.

[46]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. , 2007, Soft matter.

[47]  Shouren Ge,et al.  Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[48]  Bing‐Hsien Liu,et al.  Porcine peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma induces transdifferentiation of myocytes into adipocytes. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[49]  Joseph M DeSimone,et al.  Amorphous linear aliphatic polyesters for the facile preparation of tunable rapidly degrading elastomeric devices and delivery vectors. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[50]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[51]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[52]  J. Wong,et al.  Evaluation of polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds with physiologically-relevant elastic moduli: interplay of substrate mechanics and surface chemistry effects on vascular smooth muscle cell response. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[53]  G. Julius Vancso,et al.  Hydrophobic recovery of UV/ozone treated poly(dimethylsiloxane): adhesion studies by contact mechanics and mechanism of surface modification , 2005 .

[54]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  E Meijering,et al.  Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images , 2004, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[56]  Holger Schönherr,et al.  Nanoscale hydrophobic recovery: A chemical force microscopy study of UV/ozone-treated cross-linked poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[57]  Joe Tien,et al.  Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young's modulus. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[58]  Y. Gong,et al.  Study on physical properties and nerve cell affinity of composite films from chitosan and gelatin solutions. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[59]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  R F Fisher,et al.  The elastic constants and ultrastructural organization of a basement membrane (lens capsule) , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[61]  D. Ghista,et al.  Elastic modulus of the human intact left ventricle—determination and physiological interpretation , 1975, Medical and biological engineering.

[62]  Shawn P. Carey,et al.  Fabrication of substrates with defined mechanical properties and topographical features for the study of cell migration. , 2012, Macromolecular bioscience.

[63]  Jason A. Burdick,et al.  Spatially controlled hydrogel mechanics to modulate stem cell interactions , 2010 .

[64]  M. Textor,et al.  single cells{ , 2007 .

[65]  W. Riley,et al.  The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study , 2005 .

[66]  A. Feinberg,et al.  Investigating the Energetics of Bioadhesion on Micro-engineered Siloxane Elastomers Characterizing the Topography, Mechanical Properties and Surface Energy and its Effect on Cell Contact Guidance , 2002 .

[67]  Y. Wang,et al.  Preparation of a flexible, porous polyacrylamide substrate for mechanical studies of cultured cells. , 1998, Methods in enzymology.

[68]  J. Brash,et al.  Protein adsorption studies on 'standard' polymeric materials. , 1993, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.