Impact of Dynamics and Atmospheric State on Cloud Vertical Overlap

Abstract The observation and representation in general circulation models (GCMs) of cloud vertical overlap are the objects of active research due to their impacts on the earth’s radiative budget. Previous studies have found that vertically contiguous cloudy layers show a maximum overlap between layers up to several kilometers apart but tend toward a random overlap as separations increase. The decorrelation length scale that characterizes the progressive transition from maximum to random overlap changes from one location and season to another and thus may be influenced by large-scale vertical motion, wind shear, or convection. Observations from the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program ground-based radars and lidars in midlatitude and tropical locations in combination with reanalysis meteorological fields are used to evaluate how dynamics and atmospheric state influence cloud overlap. For midlatitude winter months, strong synoptic-scale upward motion maintains conditions close...

[1]  V. Canuto,et al.  Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data , 2006 .

[2]  W. Collins,et al.  The NCEP–NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD-ROM and Documentation , 2001 .

[3]  Gerald M. Stokes,et al.  The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program , 2003 .

[4]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Cloud radiative forcing at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Climate Research Facility: 1. Technique, validation, and comparison to satellite‐derived diagnostic quantities , 2006 .

[5]  Gerald G. Mace,et al.  Cloud-Layer Overlap Characteristics Derived from Long-Term Cloud Radar Data , 2002 .

[6]  M. Bauer,et al.  Observational Constraints on the Cloud Thermodynamic Phase in Midlatitude Storms , 2006 .

[7]  Brooks E. Martner,et al.  An Unattended Cloud-Profiling Radar for Use in Climate Research , 1998 .

[8]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[9]  S. Klein,et al.  The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations , 2004 .

[10]  Andrew E. Dessler,et al.  Instantaneous cloud overlap statistics in the tropical area revealed by ICESat/GLAS data , 2006 .

[11]  B. Weare.  A comparison of AMIP II model cloud layer properties with ISCCP D2 estimates , 2004 .

[12]  D. Randall,et al.  Stochastic generation of subgrid‐scale cloudy columns for large‐scale models , 2004 .

[13]  Christian Jakob,et al.  The Response of the ECMWF Model to Changes in the Cloud Overlap Assumption , 2000 .

[14]  C. Long,et al.  Identification of clear skies from broadband pyranometer measurements and calculation of downwelling shortwave cloud effects , 2000 .

[15]  William B. Rossow,et al.  Sensitivity of Atmospheric Radiative Heating Rate Profiles to Variations of Cloud Layer Overlap , 2000 .

[16]  E. Clothiaux,et al.  Objective Determination of Cloud Heights and Radar Reflectivities Using a Combination of Active Remote Sensors at the ARM CART Sites , 2000 .

[17]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Overlap assumptions for assumed probability distribution function cloud schemes in large‐scale models , 2005 .

[18]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[19]  Robin J. Hogan,et al.  Deriving cloud overlap statistics from radar , 2000 .