While the importance of trust has largely been explored in large business organizations, little attention has been given to the role of trust in one-on-one mentoring relationships between engineers 1 . Trust has been relatively understudied in academic settings, especially in mentoring relationships between undergraduate and graduate students in research laboratory settings. By assessing ways of creating and maintaining trust in engineering relationships, we will be able to create more comprehensive guidelines on building relationships through research experiences. In order to assess the level of trust in engineering relationships, and particularly in underrepresented groups of women and minorities (URMs), our research team will explore the role of trust in an established research-based mentoring program, called Your Own Research Experience at CU (YOU’RE@CU), that pairs graduate student mentors with undergraduate mentees. The YOU’RE@CU program takes place at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science and is in its third year of operation. The program goals include improving the retention rate of undergraduate women and URMs in engineering, increasing the undergraduate’s interest in research, and preparing graduate student mentors for leadership roles in either industry or academia. The program is held during the spring semester where the undergraduate students complete a one-credit pass/fail seminar course in which they learn about a variety of research practices and opportunities, become familiar with the graduate school admission process, meet industry professionals, and tour college research laboratories hosted by faculty members. In addition to the seminar, undergraduate mentees are paired with a graduate mentor to complete a hypothesis or objective-based, level-appropriate project during the same spring semester. To gain further information on student attitudes, undergraduate students complete several surveys to gauge their excitement and interest in engineering prior to beginning their research. The students also complete a post-research survey about their experiences. The undergraduate students gain practical research experience and demonstrate their accomplishments in an end-of-semester poster presentation. Both the undergraduates and graduate mentors complete weekly qualitative reflective questions through an online process. Through both the preand postsurveys, as well as reflective questions posed during the semester, the research team gathered information on maintaining and creating trust in these mentoring relationships. We compared and contrasted our mentor-mentee relationship to the perceived trust model created by Mayer, Davis, and Schoorman 1 . Our initial findings show that ability, benevolence, and integrity are all factors that create trust in engineering relationships. However, additional factors such as group collaboration and feelings of inclusiveness allow mentees to create a stronger level of trust in research-based relationships. By evaluating this mentoring program, we were able to gain more information on trust that can help us empower and inform the novice engineer and mentors in research-focused engineering relationships. The research results from this program can guide others as they seek to establish similar programs in mentoring and research programs addressing retention of underrepresented students in engineering.
[1]
Tricia S. Berry,et al.
GLUE: Graduates Linked with Undergraduates in Engineering
,
2005
.
[2]
E. Seymour,et al.
Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences
,
1997
.
[3]
Eileen P. Kelly,et al.
Book Reviews: Transformational Leadership: Industry, Military and Educational Impact Bernard M. Bass Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998 208 pp., Paperback, $29.95
,
1999
.
[4]
J. H. Davis,et al.
An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust
,
1995
.
[5]
C. A. Paul,et al.
The Impact Peer Mentoring Can have on Freshman Students
,
2006,
Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.
[6]
C. Stadtländer.
Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Research
,
2009
.
[7]
C. Butler,et al.
Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact
,
1999
.
[8]
Stacy D. Blake-Beard,et al.
Unfinished Business: The Impact of Race on Understanding Mentoring Relationships
,
2006
.
[9]
Sandra Ingram,et al.
Gender and Modes of Collaboration in an Engineering Classroom
,
2002
.
[10]
Shannon K. Gilmartin,et al.
Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES)
,
2010
.
[11]
B. R. Ragins,et al.
The Effects of Sex and Gender Role Orientation on Mentorship in Male-Dominated Occupations.
,
1993
.
[12]
M.A. Marszalek,et al.
Mentors Improve the College Experience of Engineering Undergraduates
,
2005,
Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.
[13]
D. Budny,et al.
Integrating peer mentoring into the freshman curriculum
,
2004,
34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..
[14]
A. Strauss,et al.
The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter
,
1968
.
[15]
H. Dryburgh.
WORK HARD, PLAY HARD
,
1999
.
[16]
Catherine T. Amelink,et al.
Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education
,
2009
.
[17]
B. Bass.
Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact
,
1997
.
[18]
Bruce J. Avolio,et al.
Full leadership development : building the vital forces in organizations
,
1999
.
[19]
Melissa S. Tooley.
The Win Program A Mentoring Program For Women In Engineering At The University Of Arkansas
,
1997
.
[20]
Lisa C. Ehrich,et al.
Formal Mentoring Programs in Education and Other Professions: A Review of the Literature
,
2004
.
[21]
A. Strauss,et al.
The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter
,
1968
.
[22]
John J. Sosik,et al.
The role of gender in mentoring: implications for diversified and homogenous mentoring relationships
,
2000
.
[23]
David Malicky,et al.
A Literature Review On The Underrepresentation Of Women In Undergraduate Engineering: Ability, Self Efficacy, And The "Chilly Climate"
,
2003
.