Improved local activation time annotation of fractionated atrial electrograms for atrial mapping

BACKGROUND Local activation time (LAT) annotation in unipolar electrograms is complicated by interference from nonlocal atrial activities of neighboring tissue. This happens due to the spatial blurring that is inherent to electrogram recordings. In this study, we aim to exploit multi-electrode electrogram recordings to amplify the local activity in each electrogram and subsequently improve the annotation of LATs. METHODS An electrogram array can be modeled as a spatial convolution of per cell transmembrane currents with an appropriate distance kernel, which depends on the cells' distances to the electrodes. By deconvolving the effect of the distance kernel from the electrogram array, we undo the blurring and estimate the underlying transmembrane currents as our desired local activities. However, deconvolution problems are typically highly ill-posed and result in unstable solutions. To overcome this issue, we propose to use a regularization term that exploits the sparsity of the first-order time derivative of the transmembrane currents. RESULTS We perform experiments on simulated two-dimensional tissues, as well as clinically recorded electrograms during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The results show that the proposed approach for deconvolution can improve the annotation of the true LAT in the electrograms. We also discuss, in summary, the required electrode array specifications for an appropriate recording and subsequent deconvolution. CONCLUSION By ignoring small but local deflections, algorithms based on steepest descent are prone to generate smoother activation maps. However, by exploiting multi-electrode recordings, we can efficiently amplify small but local deflections and reveal new details in the activation maps that were previously missed.

[1]  Vincent Jacquemet,et al.  Genesis of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in zones of slow conduction: a computer model of microfibrosis. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[2]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Total variation blind deconvolution , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[3]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  M. Courtemanche,et al.  Ionic mechanisms underlying human atrial action potential properties: insights from a mathematical model. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[5]  Richard C. Hendriks,et al.  A compact matrix model for atrial electrograms for tissue conductivity estimation , 2019, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[6]  Nicole Habel,et al.  Effects of electrode size and spacing on the resolution of intracardiac electrograms , 2012, Coronary artery disease.

[7]  A. Zakhor,et al.  Deconvolution: a novel signal processing approach for determining activation time from fractionated electrograms and detecting infarcted tissue. , 1996, Circulation.

[8]  Bahareh Abdi,et al.  Local Activation Time Annotation in Atrial Electrogram Arrays Using Deconvolution , 2019, 2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[9]  Jacques M T de Bakker,et al.  The Pathophysiologic Basis of Fractionated and Complex Electrograms and the Impact of Recording Techniques on Their Detection and Interpretation , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[10]  Angelo B. Biviano,et al.  Different characteristics of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in acute paroxysmal versus long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Heart rhythm.

[11]  Nicolas Derval,et al.  Classifying fractionated electrograms in human atrial fibrillation using monophasic action potentials and activation mapping: evidence for localized drivers, rate acceleration, and nonlocal signal etiologies. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[12]  Maurits A Allessie,et al.  A novel intra-operative, high-resolution atrial mapping approach , 2015, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[13]  Hubert Cochet,et al.  Percolation as a mechanism to explain atrial fractionated electrograms and reentry in a fibrosis model based on imaging data. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[14]  Ioanna Chouvarda,et al.  Deconvolution and wavelet-based methods for membrane current estimation from simulated fractionated electrograms , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  M. Allessie,et al.  Configuration of unipolar atrial electrograms during electrically induced atrial fibrillation in humans. , 1997, Circulation.

[16]  P R Ershler,et al.  Determination of local myocardial electrical activation for activation sequence mapping. A statistical approach. , 1991, Circulation research.

[17]  M. Spach,et al.  Relating Extracellular Potentials and Their Derivatives to Anisotropic Propagation at a Microscopic Level in Human Cardiac Muscle: Evidence for Electrical Uncoupling of Side‐to‐Side Fiber Connections with Increasing Age , 1986, Circulation research.

[18]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC , 2013 .

[19]  Prashanthan Sanders,et al.  Characterization of electrograms associated with termination of chronic atrial fibrillation by catheter ablation. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Jason H. T. Bates,et al.  Improved spatial resolution and electrogram wave direction independence with the use of an orthogonal electrode configuration , 2014, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[21]  Tom Goldstein,et al.  The Split Bregman Method for L1-Regularized Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[22]  A. Tikhonov,et al.  Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill-Posed Problems , 1995 .

[23]  R. Macleod,et al.  Spatial Methods of Epicardial Activation Time Determination in Normal Hearts , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Spencer J. Sherwin,et al.  Techniques for automated local activation time annotation and conduction velocity estimation in cardiac mapping , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[25]  Makoto Arai,et al.  A method for estimating spatial resolution of real image in the Fourier domain , 2016, Journal of microscopy.