Experimental Evaluation of the Performance of CoMP Systems for Closely-Located Users Including Users' Body Influence

Based on multi-link synchronous propagation measurements, we study the downlink performance of Coordinated Multi-point (CoMP) systems. The propagation measurements took place in an outdoor micro-cellular environment with two base stations (BSs) located 60 m apart, each equipped with two cross-polarized co-located antennas. We focus on the challenging case of having closely-located users with 0.5 m inter- user distance. We consider four virtual users, each equipped with two antennas, moving along various routes. The patterns of the users' antennas, including the user's body influence, are measured in static scenarios with an upper body phantom and a handset mockup in the LTE 2.5-2.7 GHz band. The users' composite channel matrices are constructed based on: 1) the propagation channel represented by the multipath components extracted from the propagation measurements and 2) the user- influenced antenna pattern. We first analyze the effect of the BS antenna polarization on the collinearity among the users' channel matrices. Then, we evaluate the effect of the BS antenna polarization on improving the system performance, where the performance is evaluated based on two criterion: the number of users that the system is able to serve in the same time-frequency resource, and the achievable sum-rate. It is found that using cross- polarized BS antenna improves the fairness and the sum-rate of the system. It is also found that, in contrast to the case of conventional co-located MIMO, the improvement gained by CoMP systems (with per-BS power control) from using cross-polarized BS antennas is mainly attributed to improving the multiplexing gain of the system while the system's effective power gain has insignificant contribution.

[1]  Jari Salo,et al.  Comparison of MIMO Antenna Configurations: Methods and Experimental Results , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[2]  Michael A. Jensen,et al.  Single and Multi-User Cooperative MIMO in a Measured Urban Macrocellular Environment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[3]  Sakib Bin Redhwan,et al.  Investigating the Effect of Antenna Polarization on the Performance of CoMP Systems based on Synchronous Multi-link Measurements , 2016 .

[4]  Gert Frølund Pedersen,et al.  Radiations phantom for handheld phones , 2000, Vehicular Technology Conference Fall 2000. IEEE VTS Fall VTC2000. 52nd Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.00CH37152).

[5]  Lars Thiele,et al.  Capacity Measurements in a Cooperative MIMO Network , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  F. Tufvesson,et al.  Measurements of large-scale parameters of a distributed MIMO antenna system in a microcell environment At 2.6 GHz , 2013, 2013 7th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP).

[7]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of base station antenna polarization on the performance of CoMP transmission techniques based on synchronous multi-link measurements , 2016, 2016 IEEE 27th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[8]  Elvino S. Sousa,et al.  Delay spread measurements for the digital cellular channel in Toronto , 1992, [1992 Proceedings] The Third IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[9]  Jonas Medbo,et al.  Efficient experimental evaluation of a MIMO handset with user influence , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Ghassan S. Dahman,et al.  Evaluation of the communications performance achievable on base station to handheld-terminal radio links with several different practical receive antenna arrays , 2011, 2011 Saudi International Electronics, Communications and Photonics Conference (SIECPC).

[11]  Xuefeng Yin,et al.  Performance of a high-resolution scheme for joint estimation of delay and bidirection dispersion in the radio channel , 2002, Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Spring 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37367).

[12]  Boyan Yanakiev,et al.  On Antenna Design Objectives and the Channel Capacity of MIMO Handsets , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[13]  Claude Oestges,et al.  MIMO Wireless Networks: Channels, Techniques and Standards for Multi-Antenna, Multi-User and Multi-Cell Systems , 2013 .

[14]  E. Hankui,et al.  LTE throughput evaluation of MIMO antenna handset in the presence of user's body , 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation.

[15]  Dimitra I. Kaklamani,et al.  The Impact of the Position of MIMO Terminal User's Hand on Channel Capacity , 2007, 2007 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[16]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  Performance of Multi-User Spatial Multiplexing with Measured Channel Data , 2018, MIMO System Technology for Wireless Communications.