AgileTL: A Framework for Enhancing Teaching and Learning Practices Using Software Development Principles

Action research is widely accepted in education circles as an effective practice that brings about change and improvement in the field. Action research is however not as commonly adopted by teachers (or lecturers) in their daily practices due to challenges that include a lack of understanding (in this context, of how to conduct action research), a lack of time, and the daunting prospect of uncertainty in the classroom. These challenges are also faced by software engineers when applied to the domain of software design and development and has been the focus of much research and methodologies aimed at overcoming these challenges. One such approach which has seen high uptake is agile software development which comprises phases that occur in cycles, a concept that is central to the theory of action research. The study, therefore, investigates whether the initial perception of similarities between action research and agile can be leveraged to guide Software Engineering lecturers in enhancing their teaching and learning practices more effectively. The result of this study is a framework that offers lecturers familiar with agile a systematic approach to improving their teaching and learning using familiar software development methods and principles. While this agile-based framework is designed with Information Technology lecturers in mind, it can hopefully be adopted in other disciplines as a framework that uses agile project management principles to overcome some of the identified challenges to carrying out action research in the first place.

[1]  Joyce Yee,et al.  Connecting practice to research (and back to practice): making the leap from design practice to design research , 2007 .

[2]  Pertti Järvinen,et al.  SERIES OF PUBLICATIONS D  –  NET PUBLICATIONS , 2005 .

[3]  David Tripp,et al.  Action research: a methodological introduction , 2005 .

[4]  N. Othman,et al.  The challenges of action research implementation in Malaysian schools , 2016 .

[5]  Roger S. Pressman,et al.  Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach (McGraw-Hill Series in Computer Science) , 2004 .

[6]  Stephen Kemmis,et al.  The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research , 2013 .

[7]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  David Kember,et al.  Action Learning, Action Research: Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning , 2000 .

[9]  Gregory Hine,et al.  The importance of action research in teacher education programs , 2013 .

[10]  Junrong Zhou Problems Teachers Face When Doing Action Research and Finding Possible Solutions , 2012 .

[11]  Biruk Haile The practice and challenges in conducting action research: the case of sululta secondary school , 2003 .

[12]  Marie Brennan,et al.  A school system takes on Exhibitions through teacher action research , 2009 .

[13]  Kenan Dikilitaş,et al.  Developing Language Teacher Autonomy through Action Research , 2017 .

[14]  Marie Brennan,et al.  Social-political theory in working with teachers for social justice schooling , 2009 .

[15]  Bridget Somekh,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research , 2009 .

[16]  Jack Whitehead,et al.  All you need to know about action research , 2006 .