A Two-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Teachers’ Technology Adoption

When describing teachers’ adoption of new technology, existing conceptual models tend to focus on a single dimension, either quantitative, such as the frequency or amount of technology use, or qualitative, such as the way in which a given technology influences teachers’ instructional practices. Such one-dimensional approaches can fail to adequately describe similarities and differences in technology adoption between teachers. In this chapter, we describe a conceptual framework for teacher technology adoption that incorporates two dimensions: a quantitative description of technology adoption and a qualitative description of technology adoption. Then, apply this framework to data from a year-long mixed-methods study of Earth science teachers in the Denver Public Schools district who adopted a new Web-based instructional planning system called the Curriculum Customization Service. Our findings suggest that this two-dimensional framework offers useful insights for those seeking to evaluate not only “how much” or “how frequently” teachers adopt a new technology but also how a new technology relates to teachers’ instructional practices.

[1]  E. Straub Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning , 2009 .

[2]  Michelle McKinney,et al.  Digital Library for Earth System Education , 2007 .

[3]  Melanie T Joubanian Education Development Center , 2009 .

[4]  M. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[5]  Allan C. Ornstein,et al.  Teaching: Theory into Practice , 1995 .

[6]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[7]  Carla Meskill,et al.  EXPERT AND NOVICE TEACHERS TALKING TECHNOLOGY: PRECEPTS, CONCEPTS, AND MISCONCEPTS , 2002 .

[8]  Tamara Sumner,et al.  Understanding digital library adoption: a use diffusion approach , 2011, JCDL '11.

[9]  Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al.  Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids , 2006 .

[10]  J. Brophy Teacher behavior and student achievement , 1984 .

[11]  Susan M. Frey National Science Digital Library , 2013 .

[12]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[13]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Teaching with Technology , 2011 .

[14]  Tamara Sumner,et al.  Online Curriculum Planning Behavior of Teachers , 2010, EDM.

[15]  Daniel Greenstein,et al.  The digital library: A biography , 2002 .

[16]  N. Hara,et al.  Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing , 2007 .

[17]  Larry Cuban Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[18]  Geoffrey A. Moore Crossing the chasm : marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers , 1999 .

[19]  C. Knox-Quinn International Society for Technology in Education. , 1992 .

[20]  Bethany Carlson,et al.  Effective Access: Teachers' Use of Digital Resources in STEM Teaching. , 2005 .

[21]  J. Hattie,et al.  Syntheses of educational productivity research , 1987 .

[22]  Jeannine Mjoseth,et al.  Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) , 2010 .

[23]  Becky Smerdon,et al.  Teachers' Tools for the 21st Century: A Report on Teachers' Use of Technology. Statistical Analysis Report. , 2000 .