Modeling EV charging choice considering risk attitudes and attribute non-attendance

Abstract In this paper, we developed and compared logit based models of Chinese electric vehicle (EV) drivers’ charging choice behaviors in terms of whether or not to charge at a destination with a charging facility. First, we conducted a web-based stated preference survey to obtain EV drivers’ charging choice data and EV-related risk attitudes. Using these data we developed EV drivers charging choice models based on hybrid choice modeling (HCM) framework, incorporating risk attitude and different decision strategies. The HCM binary logit model results indicate that the risk attitude variable is a significant predictor of EV drivers’ charging choices. Comparing the two HCM latent class logit (LCL) models, the attribute non-attendance (ANA) LCL model gets a better goodness-of-fit over the fully compensatory LCL model. The ANA LCL model result shows that the EV drivers are divided into two classes: risk averse class focuses primarily on the amount of excess or buffer range they have available to complete their next trip; and risk seeking class balances price against their current state of charge. This paper provides more insights into charging behavior and can be used to estimate the charging demand.

[1]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .

[2]  John W. Polak,et al.  Hazard based modelling of electric vehicles charging patterns , 2016, 2016 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific).

[3]  A. Daly,et al.  Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour , 2012 .

[4]  Soora Rasouli,et al.  Heterogeneous hazard model of PEV users charging intervals:analysis of four year charging transactions data , 2017 .

[5]  John Smart,et al.  Energy impact evaluation for eco-routing and charging of autonomous electric vehicle fleet: Ambient temperature consideration , 2018 .

[6]  Yanbo Ge,et al.  Dynamic Discrete Choice Modeling of the Charging Choices of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Drivers , 2017 .

[7]  Toshiyuki Yamamoto,et al.  Charge timing choice behavior of battery electric vehicle users , 2015 .

[8]  John W. Polak,et al.  Electric vehicle charging choices: Modelling and implications for smart charging services , 2017 .

[9]  Don MacKenzie,et al.  Modeling Charging Choices of Small-Battery Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Drivers by Using Instrumented Vehicle Data , 2016 .

[10]  John W. Polak,et al.  Response of electric vehicle drivers to dynamic pricing of parking and charging services: Risky choice in early reservations , 2017 .

[11]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Modeling the charging and route choice behavior of BEV drivers , 2016 .

[12]  H. Timmermans,et al.  Trip stage satisfaction of public transport users: A reference-based model incorporating trip attributes, perceived service quality, psychological disposition and difference tolerance , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[13]  J. Polak,et al.  Modelling the Effects of Driving Range Uncertainty on Electric Vehicle Users’ Charging Behaviour , 2013 .

[14]  Thomas Bräunl,et al.  Electric vehicle battery charging behaviour: findings from a driver survey , 2013 .

[15]  Don MacKenzie,et al.  Charging Choices and Fuel Displacement in a Large-Scale Demonstration of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[16]  Yanbo Ge,et al.  Gas anxiety and the charging choices of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle drivers , 2017, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[17]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Integrating attribute non-attendance and value learning with risk attitudes and perceptual conditioning , 2017 .

[18]  John M. Rose,et al.  Inferring attribute non-attendance from stated choice data: implications for willingness to pay estimates and a warning for stated choice experiment design , 2012 .

[19]  Stephane Hess,et al.  Latent class structures: taste heterogeneity and beyond , 2014 .

[20]  Yuan Wen,et al.  Modeling the Charging Choices of Battery Electric Vehicle Drivers by Using Stated Preference Data , 2016 .

[21]  Matthew Shirk,et al.  Data-driven optimal charging decision making for connected and automated electric vehicles: A personal usage scenario , 2018 .

[22]  Hai-Jun Huang,et al.  An optimal charging station location model with the consideration of electric vehicle’s driving range , 2018 .

[23]  Tetsuo Tezuka,et al.  Optimization of shared autonomous electric vehicles operations with charge scheduling and vehicle-to-grid , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[24]  Toshiyuki Yamamoto,et al.  Fast-charging station choice behavior among battery electric vehicle users , 2016 .

[25]  John W. Polak,et al.  Patent and Latent Predictors of Electric Vehicle Charging Behavior , 2015 .

[26]  Y. Susilo,et al.  When do you charge your electric vehicle? : A stated adaptation approach , 2017 .

[27]  Yanbo Ge,et al.  Modeling Vehicle Choices and Charging Behavior of Plug-In Electric Vehicle Owners Jointly Using Dynamic Discrete Choice Model , 2018 .

[28]  Nicolò Daina,et al.  Modelling electric vehicle use and charging behaviour , 2014 .

[29]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Joint charging mode and location choice model for battery electric vehicle users , 2017 .