Atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy: 96 week efficacy, safety and bone mineral density from the MODAt randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES To report the 96 week results on efficacy, safety and bone mineral density (BMD) in subjects with HIV-1 that were virologically suppressed and treated with atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus atazanavir/ritonavir triple therapy. METHODS MODAt is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized, 96 week trial (NCT01511809) comparing efficacy of atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus atazanavir/ritonavir triple therapy. Treatment success was defined as no occurrence of confirmed viral rebound (two consecutive HIV-RNA >50 copies/mL) or discontinuation for any cause of the ongoing regimen. RESULTS The 96 week treatment success was 64% in the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm and 63% in the triple-therapy arm (difference 1.3%, 95% CI: -17.5 to 20.1). In the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm, no PI- or NRTI-associated resistance mutations were observed at virological failure and all patients re-suppressed after re-intensification. In the monotherapy arm, treatment failure was more frequent in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus [64% versus 28% (difference 35.4%, 95% CI: 3.7-67.2)]. Drug-related adverse events leading to discontinuation were 3 (6%) in the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm and 11 (21.5%) in the triple-therapy arm (P = 0.041). The 96 week adjusted mean percentage change in total proximal femur (not at lumbar spine) BMD was +1.16% and -1.64% in the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm and the triple-therapy arm, respectively (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS The 96 week analyses suggested that long-term efficacy of atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy was inferior as compared with atazanavir/ritonavir triple therapy, particularly when administered in subjects coinfected with hepatitis C virus. In the atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm, reintroduction of nucleosides, as needed, was always effective with no new resistance mutation; monotherapy was also associated with a lower incidence of adverse events and improvement in femur BMD.

[1]  A. Mocroft,et al.  Bone mineral density and inflammatory and bone biomarkers after darunavir-ritonavir combined with either raltegravir or tenofovir-emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1: a substudy of the NEAT001/ANRS143 randomised trial. , 2015, The lancet. HIV.

[2]  A. Winston,et al.  Protease inhibitor monotherapy for long-term management of HIV infection: a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial , 2015, The lancet. HIV.

[3]  B. Clotet,et al.  Week 48 efficacy and central nervous system analysis of darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus darunavir/ritonavir with two nucleoside analogues , 2015, AIDS.

[4]  R. Paredes,et al.  The lipid-lowering effect of tenofovir/emtricitabine: a randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. , 2015, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  A. d’Arminio Monforte,et al.  Monotherapy with lopinavir/ritonavir versus standard of care in HIV-infected patients virologically suppressed while on treatment with protease inhibitor-based regimens: results from the MoLo study. , 2014, The new microbiologica.

[6]  A. d’Arminio Monforte,et al.  Simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy for HIV-1 treated individuals on virological suppression: 48-week efficacy and safety results , 2014, AIDS.

[7]  F. Pulido,et al.  Switching to lopinavir/ritonavir with or without abacavir/lamivudine in lipoatrophic patients treated with zidovudine/abacavir/lamivudine. , 2013, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[8]  Peter Reiss,et al.  Association between antiretroviral exposure and renal impairment among HIV-positive persons with normal baseline renal function: the D:A:D study. , 2013, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[9]  N. Clumeck,et al.  The MONET trial: week 144 analysis of the efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) monotherapy versus DRV/r plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, for patients with viral load < 50 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL at baseline , 2012, HIV medicine.

[10]  C. Katlama,et al.  Long-term efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy in patients with HIV-1 viral suppression: week 96 results from the MONOI ANRS 136 study. , 2012, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[11]  J. Montaner,et al.  Pilot, Randomized Study Assessing Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Simplified LPV/r Maintenance Therapy in HIV Patients on the 1st PI-Based Regimen , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  A. Rieger,et al.  96 week results from the MONET trial: a randomized comparison of darunavir/ritonavir with versus without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at baseline. , 2011, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[13]  J. Izopet,et al.  Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus current treatment continuation for maintenance therapy of HIV-1 infection: the KALESOLO trial. , 2010, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[14]  C. Vigouroux,et al.  Adipose tissue as a target of HIV-1 antiretroviral drugs. Potential consequences on metabolic regulations. , 2010, Current pharmaceutical design.

[15]  H. Günthard,et al.  Randomized controlled study demonstrating failure of LPV/r monotherapy in HIV: the role of compartment and CD4-nadir , 2010, AIDS.

[16]  F. Raffi,et al.  Long‐term (96‐week) follow‐up of antiretroviral‐naïve HIV‐infected patients treated with first‐line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in the MONARK trial * , 2010, HIV medicine.

[17]  M. Schechter,et al.  Monotherapy with Lopinavir/Ritonavir as Maintenance After HIV-1 Viral Suppression: Results of a 96-Week Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Pilot Trial (KalMo Study) , 2009, HIV clinical trials.

[18]  J. Arribas,et al.  Lopinavir-Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Lopinavir-Ritonavir and 2 Nucleosides for Maintenance Therapy of HIV: 96-Week Analysis , 2009, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[19]  F. Chiodo,et al.  RANKL/OPG/TRAIL plasma levels and bone mass loss evaluation in antiretroviral naive HIV‐1‐positive men , 2007, Journal of medical virology.

[20]  K. Mikasa,et al.  Association between osteopenia/osteoporosis and the serum RANKL in HIV-infected patients. , 2005, AIDS.