Impact of uncertainty from load-based reserves and renewables on dispatch costs and emissions

Aggregations of controllable loads are considered to be a fast-responding, cost-efficient, and environmental-friendly candidate for power system ancillary services. Unlike conventional service providers, the potential capacity from the aggregation is highly affected by factors like ambient conditions and load usage patterns. Previous work modeled aggregations of controllable loads (such as air conditioners) as thermal batteries, which are capable of providing reserves but with uncertain capacity. A stochastic optimal power flow problem was formulated to manage this uncertainty, as well as uncertainty in renewable generation. In this paper, we explore how the types and levels of uncertainty, generation reserve costs, and controllable load capacity affect the dispatch solution, operational costs, and CO2 emissions. We also compare the results of two methods for solving the stochastic optimization problem, namely the probabilistically robust method and analytical reformulation assuming Gaussian distributions. Case studies are conducted on a modified IEEE 9-bus system with renewables, controllable loads, and congestion. We find that different types and levels of uncertainty have significant impacts on dispatch and emissions. More controllable loads and less conservative solution methodologies lead to lower costs and emissions.

[1]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Achieving Controllability of Electric Loads , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Michael Chertkov,et al.  Chance-Constrained Optimal Power Flow: Risk-Aware Network Control under Uncertainty , 2012, SIAM Rev..

[3]  John Lygeros,et al.  A Probabilistic Framework for Reserve Scheduling and ${\rm N}-1$ Security Assessment of Systems With High Wind Power Penetration , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Duncan S. Callaway,et al.  Arbitraging Intraday Wholesale Energy Market Prices With Aggregations of Thermostatic Loads , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Johanna L. Mathieu,et al.  Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Optimal Power Flow With Uncertain Renewables and Uncertain Reserves Provided by Loads , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Bowen Li,et al.  Enabling renewable resource integration: The balance between robustness and flexibility , 2015, 2015 53rd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[8]  B. Kroposki,et al.  Steady-State Analysis of Maximum Photovoltaic Penetration Levels on Typical Distribution Feeders , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[9]  Johanna L. Mathieu,et al.  Stochastic Optimal Power Flow with Uncertain Reserves from Demand Response , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Analytical reformulation of security constrained optimal power flow with probabilistic constraints , 2013, 2013 IEEE Grenoble Conference.

[11]  Jian Ma,et al.  Operational Impacts of Wind Generation on California Power Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Johanna L. Mathieu,et al.  Analytical reformulation of chance-constrained optimal power flow with uncertain load control , 2015, 2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech.

[13]  Yashen Lin,et al.  Emissions impacts of using energy storage for power system reserves , 2016 .

[14]  John Lygeros,et al.  On the Road Between Robust Optimization and the Scenario Approach for Chance Constrained Optimization Problems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.