Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter.

OBJECT Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a genetic condition that frequently results in spinal sagittal plane deformity of thoracolumbar or cervicothoracic junctions. Generally, a combination of osteotomy and spinal fixation is used to treat severe cases. Although surgical techniques for traumatic injury across the cervicothoracic junction have been well characterized in clinical and biomechanical literature, the specific model of instrumented opening wedge osteotomy in autofused AS has not been studied biomechanically. This study characterizes the structural stability of various posterior fixation techniques across the cervicothoracic junction in spines with AS, specifically considering the effects of posterior rod diameter and material type. METHODS For each of 10 fresh-frozen human spines (3 male, 7 female; mean age 60 ± 10 years; C3-T6), an opening wedge osteotomy was performed at C7-T1. Lateral mass screws were inserted bilaterally from C-4 to C-6 and pedicle screws from T-1 to T-3. For each specimen, 3.2-mm titanium (Ti), 3.5-mm Ti, and 3.5-mm cobalt chromium (CoCr) posterior spinal fusion rods were tested. To simulate the anterior autofusion and long lever arms characteristic of AS, anterior cervical plates were placed from C-4 to C-7 and T-1 to T-3 using fixed angle screws. Nondestructive flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation tests were conducted to 3.0 Nm in each anatomical direction; 3D motion tracking was used to monitor primary range of motion across the osteotomy (C7-T1). Biomechanical tests used a repeat-measures test design. The order of testing for each rod type was randomized across specimens. RESULTS Constructs instrumented with 3.5-mm Ti and 3.5-mm CoCr rods were significantly stiffer in flexion-extension than those with the 3.2-mm Ti rod (25.2% ± 16.4% and 48.1% ± 15.3% greater than 3.2-mm Ti, respectively, p < 0.05). For axial rotation, the 3.5-mm Ti and 3.5-mm CoCr constructs also exhibited a significant increase in rigidity compared with the 3.2-mm Ti construct (36.1% ± 12.2% and 52.0% ± 20.0%, respectively, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in rigidity seen between the 3 types of rods in lateral bending (p > 0.05). The 3.5-mm CoCr rod constructs showed significantly higher rigidity in flexion-extension than the 3.5-mm Ti rod constructs (33.1% ± 15.5%, p < 0.05). There was a trend for 3.5-mm CoCr to have greater rigidity in axial rotation (36.2% ± 18.6%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that 3.5-mm CoCr rods are optimal for achieving the most rigid construct in opening wedge osteotomy in the cervicothoracic region of an AS model. Rod diameter and material properties should be considered in construct strategy. Some surgeons have advocated anterior plating in patients with AS after osteotomy for additional stability and bone graft surface. Although this effect was not examined in this study, additional posterior stability achieved with CoCr may decrease the need for additional anterior procedures.

[1]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Optimal reconstruction technique after C-2 corpectomy and spondylectomy: a biomechanical analysis. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  T. Glant,et al.  The genetic background of ankylosing spondylitis. , 2009, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[3]  A Rohlmann,et al.  Realistic loading conditions for upper body bending. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Zu-de Liu,et al.  [Combined pedicle subtraction osteotomy and polysegmental closing wedge osteotomy for correction of the severe thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis]. , 2009, Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery].

[5]  MULTISEGMENTAL SPINAL BIOMECHANICAL TESTING USING A NOVEL 3-D SLIDING RING PURE MOMENT APPARATUS , 2009 .

[6]  T. Kiaer,et al.  Transpedicular closed wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: results of surgical treatment and prospective outcome analysis , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[7]  T. Burd,et al.  Corrective osteotomies in spine surgery. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  P. Newton,et al.  Comparison Between 4.0-mm Stainless Steel and 4.75-mm Titanium Alloy Single-Rod Spinal Instrumentation for Anterior Thoracoscopic Scoliosis Surgery , 2008, Spine.

[9]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Surgical management of global sagittal deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. , 2008, Neurosurgical focus.

[10]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  Management of cervical deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. , 2008, Neurosurgical focus.

[11]  Jaimo Ahn,et al.  Controlled Cervical Extension Osteotomy for Ankylosing Spondylitis Utilizing the Jackson Operating Table: Technical Note , 2007, Spine.

[12]  Jung U. Yoo,et al.  Mechanical Comparison of Posterior Instrumentation Constructs for Spinal Fixation Across the Cervicothoracic Junction , 2007, Spine.

[13]  R. Melcher,et al.  A biomechanical analysis of C2 corpectomy constructs. , 2007, The spine journal.

[14]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  LUMBAR PEDICLE SUBTRACTION OSTEOTOMY , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[15]  S. Parent,et al.  Titanium Versus Stainless Steel for Anterior Spinal Fusions: An Analysis of Rod Stress as a Predictor of Rod Breakage During Physiologic Loading in a Bovine Model , 2007, Spine.

[16]  D. Resnick,et al.  41 Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction/Extension Osteotomy , 2007 .

[17]  K. Lam,et al.  C7 decancellisation closing wedge osteotomy for the correction of fixed cervico-thoracic kyphosis , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[18]  E. Simmons,et al.  Thirty-Six Years Experience of Cervical Extension Osteotomy in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Techniques and Outcomes , 2006, Spine.

[19]  V. Deviren,et al.  The Effects of Rod Contouring on Spinal Construct Fatigue Strength , 2006, Spine.

[20]  Ying-Yu Chen,et al.  Sagittal Translation in Opening Wedge Osteotomy for the Correction of Thoracolumbar Kyphotic Deformity in Ankylosing Spondylitis , 2006, Spine.

[21]  Daniel H. Kim,et al.  Biomechanical study of thoracolumbar junction fixation devices with different diameter dual-rod systems. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[22]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Transpedicular Lumbar Wedge Resection Osteotomy for Fixed Sagittal Imbalance: Surgical Technique and Early Results , 2006, Spine.

[23]  H. Bohlman,et al.  Cervicothoracic extension osteotomy for chin-on-chest deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  N. Crawford,et al.  Biomechanics of Stabilization After Cervicothoracic Compression-Flexion Injury , 2005, Spine.

[25]  T. Albert,et al.  Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern? , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[26]  C. Mazel,et al.  Posterior Cervicothoracic Instrumentation in Spine Tumors , 2004, Spine.

[27]  L. Lenke,et al.  Complications and Outcomes of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Fixed Sagittal Imbalance , 2003, Spine.

[28]  Sang-Hun Lee,et al.  Significance of Chin-Brow Vertical Angle in Correction of Kyphotic Deformity of Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients , 2003 .

[29]  L. Lenke,et al.  Anterior thoracic scoliosis constructs: effect of rod diameter and intervertebral cages on multi-segmental construct stability. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[30]  P. Mummaneni,et al.  Cervical osteotomy for the correction of chin-on-chest deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Technical note. , 2003, Neurosurgical focus.

[31]  S. Yerby,et al.  Posterior Stabilization at the Cervicothoracic Junction: A Biomechanical Study , 2002, Spine.

[32]  Muhammad Asim Khan,et al.  Genetic aspects of ankylosing spondylitis. , 2002, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[33]  C. Bourgeault,et al.  Notch Sensitivity of Titanium Alloy, Commercially Pure Titanium, and Stainless Steel Spinal Implants , 2001, Spine.

[34]  K Yamaguchi,et al.  Biocompatibility studies of titanium-based alloy pedicle screw and rod system: histological aspects. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[35]  S. Glassman,et al.  The durability of small-diameter rods in lumbar spinal fusion. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[36]  B. Freeman,et al.  Cervical osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis: an innovative variation on an existing technique , 1999, European Spine Journal.

[37]  R. Huston,et al.  Biomechanical assessment of titanium and stainless steel posterior spinal constructs: effects of absolute/relative loading and frequency on fatigue life and determination of failure modes. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[38]  N. Crawford,et al.  Construction of Local Vertebral Coordinate Systems Using a Digitizing Probe: Technical Note , 1997, Spine.

[39]  M. Mcmaster Osteotomy of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[40]  Jens R. Chapman,et al.  Posterior instrumentation of the unstable cervicothoracic spine. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[41]  E. Koeneman,et al.  An Apparatus for Applying Pure Nonconstraining Moments to Spine Segments In Vitro , 1995, Spine.

[42]  J. Lotz,et al.  Instrumentation of the Cervicothoracic Junction After Destabilization , 1995, Spine.

[43]  H. An,et al.  Anatomic Considerations for Plate‐Screw Fixation of the Cervical Spine , 1991, Spine.