Intercomparison of instruments for measuring leaf area index over rice

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key biophysical parameter used to determine foliage cover and crop growth in environmental studies in order to assess crop yield. LAI estimates can be classified as direct or indirect methods. Direct methods are destructive, time consuming, and difficult to apply over large fields. Indirect methods are non-destructive and cost-effective due to its portability, accuracy and repeatability. In this study, we compare indirect LAI estimates acquired from two classical instruments such as LAI-2000 and digital cameras for hemispherical photography, with LAI estimates acquired with a smart app (PocketLAI) installed on a mobile smartphone. In this work it is shown that LAI estimates obtained with the classical instruments and with a smartphone are well correlated. Consequently, results presented in this work allow considering PocketLAI as a powerful alternative to the classical instruments for LAI monitoring during field campaigns.

[1]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Validation of global moderate-resolution LAI products: a framework proposed within the CEOS land product validation subgroup , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  R. Myneni,et al.  Intercomparison and sensitivity analysis of Leaf Area Index retrievals from LAI-2000, AccuPAR, and digital hemispherical photography over croplands , 2008 .

[3]  Raffaele Casa,et al.  Development of an app for estimating leaf area index using a smartphone. Trueness and precision determination and comparison with other indirect methods , 2013 .

[4]  F. Baret,et al.  GEOV1: LAI, FAPAR essential climate variables and FCOVER global time series capitalizing over existing products. Part 2: Validation and intercomparison with reference products , 2013 .

[5]  F. Baret,et al.  GAI estimates of row crops from downward looking digital photos taken perpendicular to rows at 57.5° zenith angle: Theoretical considerations based on 3D architecture models and application to wheat crops , 2010 .

[6]  Fu-Shing Sun,et al.  GeoTools: An android phone application in geology , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[7]  Kevin Kowalski,et al.  Application note: The first Nitrogen Index app for mobile devices: Using portable technology for smart agricultural management , 2013 .

[8]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[9]  F. Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling , 2004 .

[10]  Hongliang Fang,et al.  Seasonal variation of leaf area index (LAI) over paddy rice fields in NE China: Intercomparison of destructive sampling, LAI-2200, digital hemispherical photography (DHP), and AccuPAR methods , 2014 .

[11]  F. J. García-Haro,et al.  Derivation of high-resolution leaf area index maps in support of validation activities: Application to the cropland Barrax site , 2009 .

[12]  Bettina Baruth,et al.  An improved model to simulate rice yield , 2009, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[13]  C. Francone,et al.  Comparison of leaf area index estimates by ceptometer and PocketLAI smart app in canopies with different structures , 2014 .