Deep levels of processing elicit a distinctiveness heuristic: Evidence from the criterial recollection task
暂无分享,去创建一个
David A. Gallo | Nathaniel G. Meadow | D. Gallo | K. Foster | Nathaniel Meadow | Elizabeth L. Johnson | Katherine T. Foster
[1] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. Suppressing False Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: The Distinctiveness Heuristic ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1999 .
[2] E. Tulving. Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .
[3] F. Craik,et al. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research , 1972 .
[4] B. Bergum,et al. Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .
[5] L. Jacoby,et al. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[6] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. Reducing memory errors: The distinctiveness heuristic. , 2006 .
[7] Michael Wilson,et al. MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .
[8] John D. Bransford,et al. Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .
[9] Daniel L Schacter,et al. Aging can spare recollection-based retrieval monitoring: the importance of event distinctiveness. , 2007, Psychology and aging.
[10] D. Schacter,et al. “If I had said it I would have remembered it: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[11] D. Gallo. Associative Illusions of Memory: False Memory Research in DRM and Related Tasks , 2006 .
[12] Jeffrey P. Toth,et al. Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: levels-of-processing effects on familiarity. , 1996, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[13] Glen E. Bodner,et al. Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[14] C. Perfetti,et al. Encoding task and recognition memory: The importance of semantic encoding. , 1973 .
[15] V. Coltheart. Recognition errors after incidental learning as a function of different levels of processing. , 1977 .
[16] J. Worthen,et al. Distinctiveness and memory. , 2006 .
[17] J. Wixted,et al. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[18] J. Seamon,et al. “If I didn’t write it, why would I remember it?” Effects of encoding, attention, and practice on accurate and false memory , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[19] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts , 2004 .
[20] F. Craik,et al. Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .
[21] W. P. Wallace,et al. Incidental learning : The influence of associative similarity and formal similarity in producing false recognition , 1968 .
[22] T. S. Hyde,et al. Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. , 1969 .
[23] F. Craik,et al. Interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. , 1977 .
[24] Michael A. McDaniel,et al. The generation effect: A meta-analytic review , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[25] A. Yonelinas. The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .
[26] Max Coltheart,et al. The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .
[27] K. McDermott,et al. The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[28] Barry S. Stein,et al. Depth of processing reexamined: The effects of the precision of encoding and test appropriateness , 1978 .
[29] John G. Seamon,et al. Memory performance and subject-defined depth of processing , 1978 .
[30] H Intraub,et al. Levels of processing and picture memory: the physical superiority effect. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[31] R. Reed Hunt,et al. Presentation modality affects false memory , 1998 .
[32] H. Roediger,et al. Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account , 1989 .
[33] Caren M. Rotello,et al. Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[34] K. McDermott,et al. False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: Effects of retention interval and level of processing , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[35] F. Craik,et al. Levels of Processing in Human Memory , 1979 .
[36] R. Marsh,et al. Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes , 1998 .
[37] Lisa Geraci,et al. Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework , 2002, Memory.
[38] Daniel L. Schacter,et al. When False Recognition Meets Metacognition: The Distinctiveness Heuristic , 2002 .
[39] David A. Balota,et al. The Word-Frequency Mirror Effect in Young, Old, and Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for Two Processes in Episodic Recognition Performance , 2002 .
[40] G. Davies,et al. Attribute Coding at Different Levels of Processing , 1976 .
[41] Morris Moscovitch,et al. Depth of processing, retrieval cues, and uniqueness of encoding as factors in recall , 1976 .
[42] J. R. Vokey,et al. Illusory Recollection and Dual–Process Models of Recognition Memory , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[43] R. Marsh,et al. An alternative conceptualization to memory "Strength" in reality monitoring , 1999 .
[44] F. Craik,et al. Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .
[45] Matthew G. Rhodes,et al. Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: Depth of retrieval , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[46] E. Hirshman,et al. Decision processes in recognition memory: criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[47] Mary Ann Foley,et al. Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring , 1981 .