Benchmarking and library quality maturity

Purpose – It remains unresolved from the literature whether benchmarking is a useful and appropriate tool for the library and information services sector. The aim of this research is to gather evidence to establish whether benchmarking provides a real and lasting benefit to library and information services.Design/methodology/approach – The study investigated the long‐term effects of a benchmarking exercise on the quality level of three UK academic libraries. However, an appropriate framework for assessing the quality level of libraries is not present in the literature, and it was therefore necessary for such a framework to be developed. This article describes and provides initial characterisation of the framework developed – the Quality Maturity Model (QMM).Findings – The evidence from the investigation showed that the two libraries which were at stage one on the QMM before the benchmarking exercise remained there; and the library which scored at the penultimate level, level four, before benchmarking, was...

[1]  Tim Stapenhurst,et al.  Achieve Total Quality , 1992 .

[2]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  A Comparison of ISO 9001 and the Capability Maturity Model for Software , 1994 .

[3]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Total Quality Management: Text with Cases , 1995 .

[4]  K. Narasimhan,et al.  Total Quality Management: Text with Cases (3rd ed.) , 2007 .

[5]  Guy St. Clair.  Total Quality Management in Information Services , 1997 .

[6]  Thomas Shaughnessy.  Benchmarking, Total Quality Management, and Libraries. , 1993 .

[7]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Total Quality Management: The Route to Improving Performance , 1993 .

[8]  Suzanne Garcia,et al.  Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1 , 1993 .

[9]  Brian S. Codling.  Benchgrafting: a model for successful implementation of the conclusions of benchmarking studies , 1998 .

[10]  John L. Hradesky.  Total Quality Management Handbook , 1994 .

[11]  Bengt Karlöf,et al.  Benchmarking: A Signpost to Excellence in Quality and Productivity , 1994 .

[12]  Will McNally,et al.  Total Quality Management. Three Steps to Continuous Improvement , 1992 .

[13]  Richard Barnes,et al.  TQM in Action:A Practical Approach to Continuous Performance Improvement , 1993 .

[14]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  Comparing ISO 9001 and the Capability Maturity Model for Software , 1993, Software Quality Journal.

[15]  P. Garrod,et al.  Benchmarking and Its Relevance to the Library and Information Sector. Interim Findings of "Best Practice Benchmarking in the Library and Information Sector," a British Library Research and Development Department Project. , 1995 .

[16]  Paul Leonard,et al.  Practical Benchmarking: The Complete Guide , 1994 .

[17]  John Brockman,et al.  Just another management fad? The implications of TQM for library and information services , 1992 .

[18]  J. Stephen Town,et al.  Performance or measurement , 2000 .

[19]  Robert C. Camp,et al.  Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance , 1989 .

[20]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model , 1991 .

[21]  Carol J. McNair,et al.  Benchmarking : A Tool for Continuous Improvement , 1992 .

[22]  J. Stephen Town,et al.  Benchmarking and Performance Measurement. , 1995 .