Persistence through function preservation

When do the folk think that material objects persist? Many metaphysicians have wanted a view which fits with folk intuitions, yet there is little agreement about what the folk intuit. I provide a range of empirical evidence which suggests that the folk operate with a teleological view of persistence: the folk tend to intuit that a material object survives alterations when its function is preserved. Given that the folk operate with a teleological view of persistence, I argue for a debunking explanation of folk intuitions, concluding that metaphysicians should dismiss folk intuitions as tied into a benighted view of nature.

[1]  K. Ludwig The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person versus Third Person Approaches , 2007 .

[2]  Michael B. Burke Coinciding Objects: Reply to Lowe and Denkel , 1997 .

[3]  R. Siegler,et al.  Children's understandings of the attributes of life. , 1986, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Tania Lombrozo,et al.  Evidence of a Preference for Teleological Explanations in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease , 2007 .

[5]  Medha Tare,et al.  A Conceptual Guide to Natural History Museum Visitors’ Understanding of Evolution , 2009 .

[6]  T. Ryan Gregory,et al.  Understanding Natural Selection: Essential Concepts and Common Misconceptions , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[7]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Developmental “Roots” in Mature Biological Knowledge , 2009, Psychological science.

[8]  A. Premack,et al.  Causal cognition : a multidisciplinary debate , 1996 .

[9]  Margaret J. Inglis,et al.  Undergraduates' understanding of evolution: ascriptions of agency as a problem for student learning , 2002 .

[10]  James E. Tomberlin,et al.  On the Plurality of Worlds. , 1989 .

[11]  Why are rocks pointy? Children's preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. , 1999 .

[12]  Alan Sidelle IS THERE A TRUE METAPHYSICS OF MATERIAL OBJECTS , 2002 .

[13]  M. Alicke,et al.  Causation, Norm violation, and culpable control , 2011 .

[14]  Ernst Mayr,et al.  The Multiple Meanings of 'Teleological' , 1998 .

[15]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[16]  E. Hirsch Against Revisionary Ontology , 2002 .

[17]  S. Guthrie,et al.  Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion , 1994 .

[18]  T. Merricks Endurance and Indiscernibility , 1994 .

[19]  Ron Good,et al.  Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison , 1995 .

[20]  Kostas Kampourakis,et al.  Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations , 2008 .

[21]  C. Allen,et al.  Teleological Notions in Biology , 1996 .

[22]  I. University-Indianapolis Preserving the Principle of One Object to a Place: A Novel Account of the Relations Among Objects, Sorts, Sortals, and Persistence Conditions , 2016 .

[23]  D. Sperber Are folk taxonomies “memes”? , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  R. Ellis,et al.  Collected Works of Francis Bacon , 1996 .

[25]  Sarah K. Brem,et al.  Evolution challenges : integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution , 2012 .

[26]  Shaun Nichols,et al.  The Lesson of Bypassing , 2013 .

[27]  Paul D. Ellis,et al.  The essential guide to effect sizes : statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results , 2010 .

[28]  P. Kleingeld,et al.  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , 2013 .

[29]  E. J. Lowe,et al.  Coinciding objects: in defence of the 'standard account' , 1995 .

[30]  D. Wiggins Sameness and substance , 1980 .

[31]  D. Kelemen,et al.  The Human Function Compunction: Teleological explanation in adults , 2009, Cognition.

[32]  T. Williamson PHILOSOPHICAL EXPERTISE AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF , 2011 .

[33]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  A Program for “Naturalizing” Metaphysics, with Application to the Ontology of Events , 2007 .

[34]  Paul Bloom Intention, history, and artifact concepts , 1996, Cognition.

[35]  God knows (but does God believe?) , 2013 .

[36]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Religion is natural. , 2007, Developmental science.

[37]  J. Hawthorne,et al.  Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics , 2008 .

[38]  R. F. Goldberg,et al.  The Folk Psychology of Consciousness , 2011 .

[39]  Joshua Knobe,et al.  The good ship Theseus: The effect of valence on object identity judgments , 2014, CogSci.

[40]  D. Kelemen Are Children “Intuitive Theists”? , 2004, Psychological science.

[41]  Edouard Machery,et al.  Deep trouble for the deep self , 2012 .

[42]  Csaba Veres,et al.  The perceived intentionality of groups , 1999, Cognition.

[43]  David Maxwell Chickering,et al.  Optimal Structure Identification With Greedy Search , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[44]  Shaun Nichols Process Debunking and Ethics* , 2014, Ethics.

[45]  W. R. Carter,et al.  The Concept of Identity. , 1984 .

[46]  Susan C. Johnson,et al.  Function and the Origins of the Design Stance , 2002 .

[47]  George Loewenstein,et al.  The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[48]  J. Thomson Parthood and Identity Across Time , 1983 .

[49]  Leonardo González Galli,et al.  The Role of Teleological Thinking in Learning the Darwinian Model of Evolution , 2011, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[50]  L. Paul Metaphysics as modeling: the handmaiden’s tale , 2012 .

[51]  Frank C. Keil,et al.  The growth of causal understandings of natural kinds. , 1995 .

[52]  Josh Parsons,et al.  Must a Four-Dimensionalist Believe in Temporal Parts? , 2000 .

[53]  Elizabeth Engel Clough,et al.  How Secondary Students Interpret Instances of Biological Adaptation. , 1985 .

[54]  Jiri Benovsky Persistence Through Time, and Across Possible Worlds , 2006 .

[55]  D. Kelemen,et al.  Developmental Continuity in Teleo-Functional Explanation: Reasoning about Nature Among Romanian Romani Adults , 2008 .

[56]  G. Kahane Evolutionary Debunking Arguments , 2011, Nous.

[57]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. , 1999 .

[58]  David Wiggins,et al.  On Being in the Same Place at the Same Time , 1968 .

[59]  R. Millikan In Defense of Proper Functions , 1989, Philosophy of Science.

[60]  Nina Strohminger,et al.  The essential moral self , 2014, Cognition.

[61]  K. Hawley How Things Persist , 2001 .

[62]  C. Meek,et al.  Graphical models: selecting causal and statistical models , 1997 .

[63]  D. Kelemen,et al.  Intuitions About Origins: Purpose and Intelligent Design in Children's Reasoning About Nature , 2005 .

[64]  L. Paul A New Role for Experimental Work in Metaphysics , 2010 .

[65]  Deborah Kelemen,et al.  The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children , 1999, Cognition.

[66]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Child's Conception of the World , 1971 .

[67]  D. Danks,et al.  In Defense of a Broad Conception of Experimental Philosophy , 2013 .

[68]  Joshua Rottman,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General Professional Physical Scientists Display Tenacious Teleological Tendencies : Purpose-Based Reasoning as a Cognitive Default , 2012 .

[69]  Daniel Z. Korman Eliminativism and the Challenge from Folk Belief , 2009 .

[70]  Murray S. Jensen,et al.  Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy , 1995 .