Technical evaluation of image quality in synthetic mammograms obtained from 15° and 40° digital breast tomosynthesis in a commercial system: a quantitative comparison
暂无分享,去创建一个
Davide Caramella | Carolina Marini | Patrizio Barca | Rocco Lamastra | Giacomo Aringhieri | Raffaele Maria Tucciariello | Antonio Traino | Maria Evelina Fantacci | A. Traino | D. Caramella | M. Fantacci | G. Aringhieri | R. Tucciariello | C. Marini | P. Barca | R. Lamastra
[1] Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al. Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program. , 2016, Radiology.
[2] H Bosmans,et al. Measurements of system sharpness for two digital breast tomosynthesis systems , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.
[3] Premkumar Elangovan,et al. The threshold detectable mass diameter for 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2019, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[4] Madhavi Raghu,et al. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography. , 2015, Radiology.
[5] Frank W. Samuelson,et al. Evaluation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis as Replacement of Full-Field Digital Mammography Using an In Silico Imaging Trial , 2018, JAMA network open.
[6] Davide Caramella,et al. Image Quality Comparison between Synthetic 2D Mammograms Obtained with 15º and 40º X-ray Tube Angular Range: A Quantitative Phantom Study , 2020, BIOIMAGING.
[7] Alberto Torresin,et al. Quality Controls in Digital Mammography protocol of the EFOMP Mammo Working group. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[8] S. Rose,et al. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[9] Luca Braglia,et al. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial. , 2018, Radiology.
[10] C Ghetti,et al. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISATION OF FOUR DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS SYSTEMS , 2018, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[11] R. Cavicchioli,et al. GPU acceleration of a model-based iterative method for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2020, Scientific Reports.
[12] D. Jaffray,et al. A framework for noise-power spectrum analysis of multidimensional images. , 2002, Medical physics.
[13] A. Holland,et al. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[14] Andriy I. Bandos,et al. Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration , 2013, European Radiology.
[15] D Origgi,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Dose and image quality assessment. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[16] J. Boone,et al. Comprar Essential Physics Of Medical Imaging, International Edition | Jerrold T. Bushberg | 9781451118100 | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins , 2012 .
[17] Chuan Zhou,et al. Synthesizing mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.
[18] C. Quinn,et al. Can the synthetic C view images be used in isolation for diagnosing breast malignancy without reviewing the entire digital breast tomosynthesis data set? , 2018, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).
[19] BreastCheck. Guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. , 2003 .
[20] Colleen H. Neal,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: studies of the effects of acquisition geometry on contrast-to-noise ratio and observer preference of low-contrast objects in breast phantom images , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[21] David Gur,et al. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. , 2019, Radiology.
[22] Melissa A. Durand,et al. Synthesized Mammography: Clinical Evidence, Appearance, and Implementation , 2018, Diagnostics.
[23] J H Siewerdsen,et al. Anatomical background and generalized detectability in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT. , 2010, Medical physics.
[24] Nehmat Houssami. Evidence on Synthesized Two‐dimensional Mammography Versus Digital Mammography When Using Tomosynthesis (Three‐dimensional Mammography) for Population Breast Cancer Screening , 2018, Clinical breast cancer.
[25] Emily F Conant,et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. , 2014, JAMA.
[26] A. Rodríguez-Ruiz,et al. Evaluation of the technical performance of three different commercial digital breast tomosynthesis systems in the clinical environment. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[27] Ehsan Samei,et al. How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM? , 2016, Medical physics.
[28] Jung Hee Shin,et al. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer , 2016, European Radiology.
[29] J. Bushberg. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2001 .
[30] Kenneth C. Young,et al. Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in 2D-Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Relation to the Standard Method of Measuring Image Quality , 2016 .
[31] K. Ng,et al. Diagnostic Efficacy of Synthesized 2D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Multi-ethnic Malaysian Population , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[32] Heang-Ping Chan,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views. , 2014, Radiology.
[33] A. Luciani,et al. Breast tomosynthesis: Dosimetry and image quality assessment on phantom. , 2015, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.
[34] K. Straif,et al. Breast-cancer screening--viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.
[35] Carrie M. Rochman,et al. Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[36] Nico Karssemeijer,et al. Generating Synthetic Mammograms From Reconstructed Tomosynthesis Volumes , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[37] Laura Pagan,et al. A comparative study of physical image quality in digital and synthetic mammography from commercially available mammography systems. , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.
[38] Manuela Durando,et al. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories , 2017, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[39] Maria Evelina Fantacci,et al. Comprehensive assessment of image quality in synthetic and digital mammography: a quantitative comparison , 2019, Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.
[40] Grace J Gang,et al. Analysis of Fourier-domain task-based detectability index in tomosynthesis and cone-beam CT in relation to human observer performance. , 2011, Medical physics.
[41] D. Kopans,et al. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art. , 2015, Radiology.
[42] Andriy I. Bandos,et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.
[43] I Andersson,et al. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[44] I. Sechopoulos. A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications. , 2013, Medical physics.
[45] Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al. Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[46] S. Kumita,et al. Comparative analysis between synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for breast cancer detection and visibility , 2020, European journal of radiology open.
[47] Woo Kyung Moon,et al. Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density , 2014, European Radiology.
[48] Heang-Ping Chan,et al. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study. , 2017, Academic radiology.
[49] M. Orsi,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: a state-of-the-art review , 2019, Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Imaging.
[50] I. Sechopoulos. A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process. , 2013, Medical physics.
[51] Ehsan Samei,et al. Assessing task performance in FFDM, DBT, and synthetic mammography using uniform and anthropomorphic physical phantoms. , 2016, Medical physics.
[52] Roberto Blanco,et al. A phantom study comparing technical image quality of five breast tomosynthesis systems. , 2019, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[53] J. Boone,et al. Comprehensive assessment of the slice sensitivity profiles in breast tomosynthesis and breast CT. , 2012, Medical physics.
[54] L. Philpotts,et al. Advances in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. , 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[55] Hilde Bosmans,et al. Characterisation of noise and sharpness of images from four digital breast tomosynthesis systems for simulation of images for virtual clinical trials , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.
[56] Petra Macaskill,et al. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.
[57] E Samei,et al. Assessment of multi-directional MTF for breast tomosynthesis , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[58] Otto Zhou,et al. Second generation stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system with faster scan time and wider angular span , 2017, Medical physics.
[59] Andriy I Bandos,et al. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. , 2014, Radiology.
[60] S. Chikarmane,et al. Strengths and Weaknesses of Synthetic Mammography in Screening. , 2017, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[61] A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening. , 2018, European journal of radiology.
[62] Andriy I Bandos,et al. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images. , 2014, Radiology.