Intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) with centrally blocked rotational fields.

A new technique for intensity-modulated beam (IMB) delivery that combines the features of intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) with the use of 'classical blocks' is proposed. The role of the blocks is to realize the high-gradient modulation of the intensity profile corresponding to the region to be protected within the body contour, while the MLC leaves or the secondary collimator defines the rest of the field and delivers intensity-modulated multiple rotational segments. The centrally blocked radiation fields are applied sequentially, in several rotations. Each rotation of the gantry is responsible for delivering one segment of the optimal intensity profile. The new IMAT technique is applied for a treatment geometry represented by an annular target volume centrally located within a circular body contour. The annulus encompasses a circular critical structure, which is to be protected. The beam opening and corresponding weight of each segment are determined in two ways. The first method applies a linear optimization algorithm to precalculated centrally blocked radial dose profiles. These radial profiles are calculated for a set of beam openings, ranging from the largest field that covers the whole planning target volume (PTV) to the smallest, which is 1 cm larger than the width of the central block. The optimization is subjected to dose homogeneity constraints imposed on a linear combination of these profiles and finally delivers the dimensions and weights of the rotational beams to be used in combination. The second method decomposes into several subfields the fluence profile of a rotational beam known to deliver a constant dose level to PTV. This fluence profile is determined by using the analytical method proposed by Brahme for the case of the annular PTV and the concentric organ at risk (OAR). The proper segmentation of this intensity profile provides the field sizes and corresponding weights of the subfields to be used in combination. Both methods show that for this particular treatment geometry, three to seven segments are sufficient to cover the PTV with the 95% dose level and to keep the dose level to the central critical structure under 30% of the maximum dose. These results were verified by experimentally delivering the calculated segments to radiotherapy verification films sandwiched between two cylindrical pieces of a pressed-wood phantom. The total beam time for a three-field irradiation was 77 s. The predicted and experimental dose profiles along the radius of the phantom agreed to within 5%. Generalization of this technique to real-patient treatment geometry and advantages over other conformal radiotherapy techniques are also discussed.

[1]  S. Webb Conformal intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivered by robotic linac--testing IMRT to the limit? , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  R Mohan,et al.  Development in a Windows environment of a radiation treatment planning system for personal computers. , 1998, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[3]  C. Fiorino,et al.  Dynamic 1D beam modulation by a single absorber: Theoretical analysis for optimizing apparatus' performances , 1995 .

[4]  T. Jordan,et al.  A proposal for quality assurance of multi-leaf collimators , 1995 .

[5]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Anders Brahme,et al.  Development of treatment techniques for radiotherapy optimization , 1995, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[7]  Mark P. Carol,et al.  Peacock™: A system for planning and rotational delivery of intensity‐modulated fields , 1995, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[8]  C. Fiorino,et al.  Dynamic beam modulation by using a single computer-controlled absorber , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  W Schlegel,et al.  Dynamic X-ray compensation for conformal radiotherapy by means of multi-leaf collimation. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  S. Spirou,et al.  Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators. , 1994, Medical physics.

[11]  J O Deasy,et al.  Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. , 1993, Medical physics.

[12]  D. Convery,et al.  The generation of intensity-modulated fields for conformal radiotherapy by dynamic collimation , 1992 .

[13]  R Mohan,et al.  Compensators for three-dimensional treatment planning. , 1991, Medical physics.

[14]  J W Andrew,et al.  Optimal design of radiation compensators. , 1990, Medical physics.

[15]  A Brahme,et al.  Rotation therapy using a novel high-gradient filter. , 1982, Radiology.

[16]  A Brahme,et al.  Solution of an integral equation encountered in rotation therapy. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  J. Cunningham,et al.  An examination of synchronous shielding in 60 Co rotational therapy. , 1972, Radiology.

[18]  R Svensson,et al.  An analytical solution for the dynamic control of multileaf collimators. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.