Remixers' understandings of fair use online

How do online content creators make decisions about copyright law? In the course of day-to-day online activities, Internet users are forced to make subtle judgments about one of the most confusing and nuanced areas of law, copyright and fair use. In this study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with eleven content creators who participate in remix and fan creation activities online, to try to probe their legal understandings and attitudes. We found that social norms that emerge among these content creators do not always track to what the law actually says, but are often guided more by ethical concerns. Our participants showed surprisingly similar patterns of understandings and confusions, impacting technology use and interaction online.

[1]  Benjamin Mako Hill,et al.  The Remixing Dilemma , 2012, ArXiv.

[2]  Matthew Hills,et al.  Fan Fiction and Fan Communities in the Age of the Internet , 2008 .

[3]  Casey Fiesler,et al.  The chilling tale of copyright law in online creative communities , 2013, XRDS.

[4]  Oshani Seneviratne,et al.  Remix Culture on the Web: A Survey of Content Reuse on Different User-Generated Content Websites , 2010 .

[5]  Rebecca Tushnet,et al.  Payment in Credit: Copyright Law and Subcultural Creativity , 2007 .

[6]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy , 2008 .

[7]  Henry Jenkins.  Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture , 1992 .

[8]  Lydia Pallas Loren,et al.  Building a Reliable Semicommons of Creative Works: Enforcement of Creative Commons Licenses and Limited Abandonment of Copyright , 2007 .

[9]  Giorgos Cheliotis,et al.  An analysis of the social structure of remix culture , 2009, C&T.

[10]  Jeffrey D. Graveline.  Debunking Common Misconceptions and Myths , 2010 .

[11]  Robert C. Ellickson.  Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbors in Shasta County , 1986 .

[12]  Patricia Aufderheide,et al.  Reclaiming Fair Use: How to Put Balance Back in Copyright , 2011 .

[13]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Contribution, commercialization & audience: understanding participation in an online creative community , 2009, GROUP.

[14]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[15]  How to Suppress Women's Remix , 2011 .

[16]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Computers can't give credit: how automatic attribution falls short in an online remixing community , 2010, CHI.

[17]  Aram Sinnreich.  Mashed Up: Music, Technology, and the Rise of Configurable Culture , 2010 .

[18]  Irfan A. Essa,et al.  The evolution of authorship in a remix society , 2007, HT '07.

[19]  S. Hetcher.  Using Social Norms to Regulate Fan Fiction and Remix Culture , 2009 .

[20]  Sean P. Goggins,et al.  #TwitterPlay: a case study of fan roleplaying online , 2013, CSCW '13.

[21]  Rebecca Tushnet.  User-Generated Discontent: Transformation in Practice , 2008 .

[22]  K. Wells,et al.  Interviewing in Qualitative Research , 2018 .

[23]  Mizuko Ito,et al.  Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media , 2009 .

[24]  Gregg J. Rickman.  : Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture . Henry Jenkins. , 1993 .

[25]  James Gibson,et al.  Risk Aversion and Rights Accretion in Intellectual Property Law , 2007 .

[26]  Sal Humphreys.  The challenges of intellectual property for users of social networking sites: a case study of Ravelry , 2008, MindTrek '08.

[27]  Leif Ove Larsen,et al.  Documentary in a Culture of Clearance: A Study of Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Copyright and Fair Use Among Norwegian Documentary Makers , 2010 .

[28]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The Basics Of Social Research , 1998 .