The United Nations publishes unemployment statistics for 123 countries. Most of these statistics are based on International Labour Office (ILO) criteria for the definition of unemployment. Many countries also produce unemployment statistics based on insurance records and on the basis of registered unemployment. This paper aims to compare the main features of the different methods. The dimensions compared include the conceptual basis for the definition of unemployment, boundaries of employment and inactivity, entry statistics and duration of unemployment, use of denominators for production of unemployment rates, and the cultural influence of the statistics. The paper identifies conflicts between achieving international comparability and national needs. Survey statistics that underpin international comparisons do not support geographically detailed analysis within countries. The value of unemployment statistics based on ILO criteria is limited by a failure to recognise the concept of entry to unemployment and the difficulties of integration with administrative unemployment statistics. The standard labour force survey (LFS) questionnaire should be modified to support the production of statistics for entrants to unemployment. The sampling frame should be modified to ensure consistency with nationally produced unemployment statistics derived from administrative records.
[1]
W. Garside.
The measurement of unemployment: Methods and sources in Great Britain, 1850-1979
,
1980
.
[2]
N. Kiefer.
Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions
,
1988
.
[3]
W. Beveridge.
Full Employment in a Free Society.
,
1944
.
[4]
P. Gregg,et al.
The State of Working Britain
,
1999
.
[5]
W. Garside.
The measurement of unemployment
,
1980
.
[6]
F. Mehran,et al.
Surveys of economically active population, employment, unemployment, and underemployment: An ILO manual on concepts and methods
,
1992
.
[7]
M. Blaug,et al.
Unemployment in History: Economic Thought and Public Policy.
,
1978
.
[8]
Richard Layard,et al.
Unemployment in Britain
,
1986
.
[9]
S. Fothergill,et al.
The Real Level of Unemployment
,
1997
.
[10]
S. Fothergill,et al.
A Theory of Employment, Unemployment and Sickness
,
2000
.
[11]
D. Webster.
Long-Term Unemployment, the Invention of 'Hysteresis' and the Misdiagnosis of Structural Unemployment in the UK
,
2005
.
[12]
A. Green,et al.
The real level of unemployment 2002
,
2017
.