Measurement theory in local quantum physics

In this paper, we aim to establish foundations of measurement theory in local quantum physics. For this purpose, we discuss a representation theory of completely positive (CP) instruments on arbitrary von Neumann algebras. We introduce a condition called the normal extension property (NEP) and establish a one-to-one correspondence between CP instruments with the NEP and statistical equivalence classes of measuring processes. We show that every CP instrument on an atomic von Neumann algebra has the NEP, extending the well-known result for type I factors. Moreover, we show that every CP instrument on an injective von Neumann algebra is approximated by CP instruments with the NEP. The concept of posterior states is also discussed to show that the NEP is equivalent to the existence of a strongly measurable family of posterior states for every normal state. Two examples of CP instruments without the NEP are obtained from this result. It is thus concluded that in local quantum physics not every CP instrument represents a measuring process, but in most of physically relevant cases every CP instrument can be realized by a measuring process within arbitrary error limits, as every approximately finite dimensional (AFD) von Neumann algebra on a separable Hilbert space is injective. To conclude the paper, the concept of local measurement in algebraic quantum field theory is examined in our framework. In the setting of the Doplicher-Haag-Roberts and Doplicher-Roberts (DHR-DR) theory describing local excitations, we show that an instrument on a local algebra can be extended to a local instrument on the global algebra if and only if it is a CP instrument with the NEP, provided that the split property holds for the net of local algebras.

[1]  John Maddox Beating the quantum limits (cont'd) , 1988, Nature.

[2]  W. Arveson Analyticity in Operator Algebras , 1967 .

[3]  D. Buchholz,et al.  The universal structure of local algebras , 1987 .

[4]  Alain Connes,et al.  Noncommutative geometry , 1994 .

[5]  G. Mackey Borel structure in groups and their duals , 1957 .

[6]  C. Anantharaman-Delaroche Amenable correspondences and approximation properties for von Neumann algebras , 1995 .

[7]  J. Schwinger THE GEOMETRY OF QUANTUM STATES. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Ozawa Universally valid reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and disturbance in measurement , 2002, quant-ph/0207121.

[9]  Reinhard F. Werner The uncertainty relation for joint measurement of position and momentum , 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[10]  J. Schwinger UNITARY OPERATOR BASES. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  W. Stinespring Positive functions on *-algebras , 1955 .

[12]  G. Lüders Über die Zustandsänderung durch den Meßprozeß , 1950 .

[13]  S. Baek,et al.  Experimental test of error-disturbance uncertainty relations by weak measurement. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[14]  Roberto Longo,et al.  On Noether's Theorem in Quantum Field Theory , 1986 .

[15]  Huzihiro Araki,et al.  Mathematical theory of quantum fields , 1999 .

[16]  小澤 正直 An Operational Approach to Quantum State Reduction , 1997 .

[17]  J. Dixmier,et al.  Von Neumann Algebras , 1981 .

[18]  E. Davies,et al.  On the repeated measurement of continuous observables in quantum mechanics , 1970 .

[19]  Mathematical foundations of quantum information: Measurement and foundations , 2012, 1201.5334.

[20]  Masanao Ozawa UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE FOR QUANTUM INSTRUMENTS AND COMPUTING , 2003 .

[21]  Ozawa Measurement breaking the standard quantum limit for free-mass position. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[22]  C. Branciard Error-tradeoff and error-disturbance relations for incompatible quantum measurements , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  C. Caves,et al.  Defense of the standard quantum limit for free-mass position. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[24]  Vladimir B. Braginsky,et al.  Quantum Nondemolition Measurements , 1980, Science.

[25]  Masanao Ozawa,et al.  Physical content of Heisenberg's uncertainty relation: limitation and reformulation , 2003 .

[26]  J. Schwinger THE ALGEBRA OF MICROSCOPIC MEASUREMENT. , 1959, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  M. Ozawa,et al.  Violation of Heisenberg's error-disturbance uncertainty relation in neutron-spin measurements , 2013, 1305.7251.

[28]  M. Takesaki,et al.  Analyticity and the Unruh effect: a study of local modular flow , 2024, Journal of High Energy Physics.

[29]  M. Ozawa Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables , 1984 .

[30]  K. Kraus General state changes in quantum theory , 1971 .

[31]  Cyril Branciard,et al.  Deriving tight error-trade-off relations for approximate joint measurements of incompatible quantum observables , 2013, 1312.1857.

[32]  Masanao Ozawa,et al.  Noise and disturbance in quantum measurements: an information-theoretic approach. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[33]  Masanao Ozawa,et al.  Realization of Measurement and the Standard Quantum Limit , 2015, 1505.01083.

[34]  Andrew G. White,et al.  Experimental joint quantum measurements with minimum uncertainty. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[35]  Hans Halvorson,et al.  Remote preparation of arbitrary ensembles and quantum bit commitment , 2004 .

[36]  竹崎 正道 Theory of operator algebras , 2002 .

[37]  M. Ozawa,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a universally valid error–disturbance uncertainty relation in spin measurements , 2012, Nature Physics.

[38]  H. Umegaki CONDITIONAL EXPECTATION IN AN OPERATOR ALGEBRA, II , 1954 .

[39]  Rudolf Haag,et al.  Fields, observables and gauge transformations I , 1969 .

[40]  Chen C. Chang,et al.  Model Theory: Third Edition (Dover Books On Mathematics) By C.C. Chang;H. Jerome Keisler;Mathematics , 1966 .

[41]  M. Sentís Quantum theory of open systems , 2002 .

[42]  John E. Roberts,et al.  Local observables and particle statistics I , 1971 .

[43]  R. Werner,et al.  Proof of Heisenberg's error-disturbance relation. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[44]  J. Maddox Maintaining the balance , 1988, Nature.

[45]  F. Buscemi,et al.  Experimental Test of Entropic Noise-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations for Spin-1/2 Measurements. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[46]  Günther Ludwig,et al.  Attempt of an axiomatic foundation of quantum mechanics and more general theories, II , 1967 .

[47]  On von Neumann's theory of measurments in quantum statistics. , 1962 .

[48]  John E. Roberts,et al.  Fields, observables and gauge transformations II , 1969 .

[49]  Masanao Ozawa,et al.  Conditional Probability and A Posteriori States in Quantum Mechanics , 1985 .

[50]  J. Neumann Mathematische grundlagen der Quantenmechanik , 1935 .

[51]  W. Heisenberg Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik , 1927 .

[52]  Masanao Ozawa Uncertainty relations for noise and disturbance in generalized quantum measurements , 2003 .

[53]  Paul Busch,et al.  Measurement uncertainty relations , 2013, 1312.4392.

[54]  Maxim Raginsky Radon-Nikodym derivatives of quantum operations , 2003 .

[55]  Keiichi Edamatsu,et al.  Experimental violation and reformulation of the Heisenberg's error-disturbance uncertainty relation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[56]  M. Hall,et al.  Prior information: How to circumvent the standard joint-measurement uncertainty relation , 2003, quant-ph/0309091.

[57]  Concepts of conditional expectations in quantum theory , 1985 .

[58]  R. Haag,et al.  An Algebraic Approach to Quantum Field Theory , 1964 .

[59]  Rudolf Haag,et al.  Local observables and particle statistics II , 1971 .

[60]  A. Robinson Non-standard analysis , 1966 .

[61]  William Arveson,et al.  The noncommutative Choquet boundary , 2007 .

[62]  Horace P. Yuen,et al.  Contractive states and the standard quantum limit for monitoring free-mass positions , 1983 .

[63]  Eyvind H. Wichmann,et al.  Causal independence and the energy-level density of states in local quantum field theory , 1986 .

[64]  Masanao Ozawa Uncertainty relations for joint measurements of noncommuting observables , 2004 .

[65]  John E. Roberts,et al.  Why there is a field algebra with a compact gauge group describing the superselection structure in particle physics , 1990 .

[66]  Nathanial P. Brown Narutaka Ozawa C*-Algebras and Finite-Dimensional Approximations , 2008 .

[67]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Violation of Heisenberg's measurement-disturbance relationship by weak measurements. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[68]  V. Paulsen Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Algebras: Contents , 2003 .

[69]  M. Ozawa Conditional expectation and repeated measurements of continuous quantum observables , 1983 .

[70]  E. Stachow An Operational Approach to Quantum Probability , 1978 .

[71]  I. Ojima,et al.  Local State and Sector Theory in Local Quantum Physics , 2015, 1501.00234.

[72]  John E. Roberts,et al.  A new duality theory for compact groups , 1989 .

[73]  E. Effros,et al.  Tensor products of operator algebras , 1977 .

[74]  Canonical approximate quantum measurements , 1993 .

[75]  W. Arveson On subalgebras of $C^*$-algebras , 1969 .

[76]  D. Buchholz Product states for local algebras , 1974 .