Learning Objects Update: Review and Critical Approach to Content Aggregation

The structure and composite nature of a learning object is still open to interpretation. Although several theoretical studies advocate integrated approaches to the structure and aggregation level of learning objects, in practice, many content specifications, such as SCORM, IMS Content Packaging, and course authoring tools, do not explicitly state the aggregation level or granularity of learning content. The aim of this paper is to review, compare, and amalgamate different content models for learning objects into a single and coherent learning content hierarchy. To fulfil the objectives of this study, a substantive body of literature was reviewed and analysed to identify current issues in the field of learning objects, and more specifically, learning object content models.

[1]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Ontologies to integrate learning design and learning content , 2005 .

[2]  Rob Koper,et al.  Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Laurence F Johnson,et al.  Elusive Vision: Challenges Impeding the Learning Object Economy , 2003 .

[4]  Oleg Liber,et al.  A framework for pedagogical evaluation of virtual learning environments , 1999 .

[5]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Handbook on Ontologies , 2004, Künstliche Intell..

[6]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[7]  C. Thomas Wu.  An Introduction to Object-Oriented Programming With Java , 1998 .

[8]  Wayne Hodgins,et al.  Reusable Learning Object Strategy : Designing and Developing Learning Objects for Multiple Learning Approaches , 2003 .

[9]  Sissel Guttormsen Schär,et al.  Implementing Learning Content Management , 2003, INTERACT.

[10]  William Song.  A Metadata Framework for Description of Learning Objects , 2002, ICWL.

[11]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Ontologies: A silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce , 2002 .

[12]  施國琛,et al.  Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) , 2008, Encyclopedia of Multimedia.

[13]  Vincent Wade,et al.  Towards a Standards-based Approach to e-Learning Personalization using Reusable Learning Objects , 2002 .

[14]  Erik Duval,et al.  Towards a Global Architecture for Learning Objects: A Comparative Analysis of Learning Object Content Models , 2004 .

[15]  Erik Duval,et al.  Ontology-based learning content repurposing , 2005, WWW '05.

[16]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[17]  David Wiley,et al.  Instructional Use of Learning Objects , 2001 .

[18]  Pithamber R. Polsani,et al.  Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects , 2006, J. Digit. Inf..

[19]  Brandon Muramatsu,et al.  Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata , 2002 .

[20]  Lorna M. Campbell,et al.  Evaluating 5/99 content for reusability as learning objects , 2005 .

[21]  Steffen Staab,et al.  eLearning based on the semantic web , 2001 .

[22]  Alina Stasiecka,et al.  An approach to the quality and reusability of metadata specifications for e-learning objects , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[23]  Hubert Vogten,et al.  Educational Modelling language , 2003 .

[24]  Angelo Panar.  Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) , 2009 .