The Japanese Tsunami and Resulting Nuclear Emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi Power Facility: Technical, Radiologic, and Response Perspectives

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power facility, in the Futaba District of the Fukushima Prefecture in Japan, was severely damaged by the earthquake and ensuing tsunami that struck off the northern coast of the island of Honshu on March 11, 2011. The resulting structural damage to the plant disabled the reactor's cooling systems and led to significant, ongoing environmental releases of radioactivity, triggering a mandatory evacuation of a large area surrounding the plant. The status of the facility continues to change, and permanent control of its radioactive inventory has not yet been achieved. The purpose of this educational article is to summarize the short-term chronology, radiologic consequences, emergency responses, and long-term challenges associated with this event. Although there is ongoing debate on preparedness before the event and the candor of responsible entities in recognizing and disclosing its severity, it largely appears that appropriate key actions were taken by the Japanese authorities during the event that should mitigate any radiologic health impact. These actions include an organized evacuation of over 200,000 inhabitants from the vicinity of the site and areas early in the emergency; monitoring of food and water and placement of radiation limits on such foodstuffs; distribution of stable potassium iodide; and systematic scanning of evacuees. However, the risk of additional fuel damage and of further, perhaps substantial, releases persists. The situation at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear facility remains fluid, and the long-term environmental and health impact will likely take years to fully delineate.

[1]  C. H. Clement,et al.  Application of the commission's recommendations for the protection of people in emergency exposure situations , 2009 .

[2]  T. Hattori Japan Atomic Industrial Forum, INC , 1956 .

[3]  J. F. Briesmeister MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[4]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Looking Back, Looking Forward , 2009, Annals of the ICRP.

[5]  Meti IAEA International Fact Finding Expert Mission of the Nuclear Accident Following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami , 2011 .

[6]  Nea Criteria for use in preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency: General safety guide , 2011 .

[7]  And now, Fukushima. , 2011, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[8]  Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety : the Accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations , 2011 .

[9]  A McGarry,et al.  ICRP Publication 111 - Application of the Commission's recommendations to the protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident or a radiation emergency. , 2009, Annals of the ICRP.

[10]  M. Thomas Potassium Iodide (KI) , 1997 .

[11]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[12]  A. Park,et al.  CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH , 2009 .

[13]  T. J. McKenna,et al.  Source term estimation during incident response to severe nuclear power plant accidents , 1988 .

[14]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[15]  Division on Earth Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 , 2006 .

[16]  D. Butler Fukushima health risks scrutinized , 2011, Nature.

[17]  J. Links,et al.  Understanding radiologic and nuclear terrorism as public health threats: preparedness and response perspectives. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.