Scientific explanation: A critical survey

This paper describes the development of theories of scientific explanation since Hempel's earliest models in the 1940ies. It focuses on deductive and probabilistic whyexplanations and their main problems: lawlikeness, explanation-prediction asymmetries, causality, deductive and probabilistic relevance, maximal specifity and homogenity, the height of the probability value. For all of these topic the paper explains the most important approaches as well as their criticism, including the author's own accounts. Three main theses of this paper are: (1) Both deductive and probabilistic explanations are important in science, not reducible to each other. (2) One must distinguish between (cause giving) explanations and (reason giving) justifications and predictions. (3) The adequacy of deductive as well as probabilistic explanations is relative to a pragmatically given background knowledge-which does not exclude, however, the possibility of purely semantic models.

[1]  Carl G. Hempel,et al.  Aspekte wissenschaftlicher Erklärung , 1977 .

[2]  Jaegwon Kim,et al.  On the Logical Conditions of Deductive Explanation , 1963, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  R. Tuomela,et al.  Essays on Explanation and Understanding , 1976 .

[4]  D. Gasking,et al.  III.—CAUSATION AND RECIPES , 1955 .

[5]  J. McKinsey,et al.  The Problem of Counterfactual Conditionals. , 1947 .

[6]  O. Penrose.  The Direction of Time , 1962 .

[7]  N. Goodman.  A Query on Confirmation , 1946 .

[8]  N. Goodman,et al.  Ways of Worldmaking , 1980 .

[9]  The Structure of Physical Explanation , 1980, Philosophy of Science.

[10]  William P. Alston,et al.  The Place of the Explanation of Particular Facts in Science , 1971, Philosophy of Science.

[11]  M. Käsbauer.  Definitionen der wissenschaftlichen erklärung , 1976 .

[12]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  The Roots of Reference , 1974 .

[13]  Gerhard Schurz,et al.  Erklären und Verstehen in der Wissenschaft , 1990 .

[14]  K. Pearson.  The Grammar of Science , 1892, Nature.

[15]  Rolf A. Eberle,et al.  Hempel and Oppenheim on Explanation , 1961, Philosophy of Science.

[16]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[17]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[18]  Michael Küttner.  Ein verbesserter deduktiv-nomologischer Erklärungsbegriff , 1976 .

[19]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Naming and Necessity , 1980 .

[20]  C. W. Kilmister,et al.  Philosophical Problems of Space and Time , 1965 .

[21]  H. Maxwell,et al.  Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science , 1961 .

[22]  Ilkka Niiniluoto,et al.  Theoretical concepts and hypothetico-inductive inference , 1973 .

[23]  J. Altham.  Naming and necessity. , 1981 .

[24]  P. Gärdenfors.  Relevance and Redundancy in Deductive Explanations , 1976 .

[25]  Richard C. Jeffrey,et al.  Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability (Vol. II). , 1982 .

[26]  L. See.  A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science , 1993 .

[27]  W. Salmon.  The Status of Prior Probabilities in Statistical Explanation , 1965, Philosophy of Science.

[28]  Patrick Gardiner.  The nature of historical explanation , 1952 .

[29]  Adolf Grünbaum,et al.  Temporally-Asymmetric Principles, Parity between Explanation and Prediction, and Mechanism versus Teleology , 1962, Philosophy of Science.

[30]  Fred Wilson.  Explanation, Causation and Deduction , 1985 .

[31]  Merrrilee H. Salmon,et al.  Explanation in the social sciences , 1989 .

[32]  B. Kanitscheider.  Wissenschaftstheorie der Naturwissenschaft , 1981 .

[33]  Wolfgang Stegmüller,et al.  Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung , 1969 .

[34]  G. Schurz.  Relevant Deduction. From Solving Paradoxes Towards a General Theory , 1991 .

[35]  Rudolf Carnap,et al.  Logical foundations of probability , 1951 .

[36]  W. Salmon.  Four decades of scientific explanation , 1989 .

[37]  L. Wittgenstein.  Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , 2021, Nordic Wittgenstein Review.

[38]  Herbert Feigl,et al.  On the Vindication of Induction , 1961, Philosophy of Science.

[39]  Henry B. Veatch,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Carl G. Hempel , 1970 .

[40]  C. Hempel.  The Function of General Laws in History , 1942 .

[41]  William Whewell,et al.  The philosophy of the inductive sciences , 1847 .

[42]  Hans Lenk,et al.  Bemerkungen zur pragmatisch-epistemischen wende in der wissenschaftstheoretischen analyse der ereigniserklärungen , 1985 .

[43]  M. Friedman.  Explanation and Scientific Understanding , 1974 .

[44]  Gerhard Schurz.  Wissenschaftliche Erklärung. Ansätze zu einer logisch-pragmatischen Wissenschaftstheorie , 1983 .

[45]  J. Woodward,et al.  Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World , 1988 .

[46]  William H. Dray,et al.  Laws and explanation in history , 1960 .

[47]  W. Stegmüller.  Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und analytischen Philosophie , 1974 .

[48]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  A Pragmatic Approach to Explanations , 1980 .

[49]  W. H. F. Barnes.  The Nature of Explanation , 1944, Nature.

[50]  Statistical Ambiguity and Maximal Specificity , 1968, Philosophy of Science.

[51]  P. Railton.  A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation , 1978, Philosophy of Science.

[52]  C. Hempel.  Maximal Specificity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic Explanation , 1968, Philosophy of Science.

[53]  Raimo Tuomela.  Morgan on deductive explanation: A rejoinder , 1976, J. Philos. Log..

[54]  H. Reichenbach.  The rise of scientific philosophy , 1952 .

[55]  H. Feigl,et al.  Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science , 1956 .

[56]  Richard C. Jeffrey,et al.  Studies in inductive logic and probability , 1971 .

[57]  Patrick Suppes.  Explaining the Unpredictable , 1985 .

[58]  N. Cartwright.  Causal Laws and Effective Strategies , 1979 .

[59]  Arthur W. Burks,et al.  VIII.—THE LOGIC OF CAUSAL PROPOSITIONS , 1951 .

[60]  K. Popper.  Logik der Forschung : zur erkenntnistheorie der modernen naturwissenschaft , 1936 .

[61]  Raimo Tuomela.  Explaining explaining , 1980 .

[62]  R. Carnap.  On the Application of Inductive Logic , 1947 .

[63]  Gerhard Schurz,et al.  Ein logisch-pragmatisches modell von deduktiv-nomologischer erklärung (systematisierung) , 1982 .

[64]  M. Schlick.  Die wende der Philosophie , 1930 .

[65]  J. Mill.  A System of Logic , 1843 .

[66]  C. Hempel,et al.  Studies in the Logic of Explanation , 1948, Philosophy of Science.

[67]  H. Jeffreys.  A Treatise on Probability , 1922, Nature.

[68]  W. Salmon,et al.  Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science , 1989 .

[69]  Richard C. Jeffrey,et al.  Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability. Volume I , 1974 .

[70]  K. Popper,et al.  Logik der Forschung , 1935 .

[71]  Maxwell's Condition—Goodman's Problem , 1979, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[72]  P. Suppes.  A Probabilistic Theory Of Causality , 1970 .

[73]  Wesley C. Salmon,et al.  Statistical explanation & statistical relevance , 1971 .

[74]  C. Hempel,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. , 1966 .

[75]  W. Salmon.  On Vindicating Induction , 1963, Philosophy of Science.

[76]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  Salmon on Explanation , 1985 .

[77]  Hans Reichenbach,et al.  The theory of probability , 1968 .

[78]  Hans Reichenbach,et al.  Elements of symbolic logic , 1948 .

[79]  Gerhard Schurz.  Was ist wissenschaftliches Verstehen? Eine Theorie verstehensbewirkender Erklärungsepisoden , 1990 .

[80]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  The Logic of Causal Propositions. , 1951 .

[81]  Matti Sintonen,et al.  Wolfgang STEGMÜLLER: Erklärung- Begründung- Kausalität. Zweite, verbesserte und erweiterte Auflage. Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie, Band I. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag 1983, XX+1116 S. , 1984 .