On time-splitting spectral approximations for the Schrödinger equation in the semiclassical regime

In this paper we study time-splitting spectral approximations for the linear Schrodinger equation in the semiclassical regime, where the Planck constant e is small. In this regime, the equation propagates oscillations with a wavelength of O (e), and finite difference approximations require the spatial mesh size h = o(e) and the time step k = o(e) in order to obtain physically correct observables. Much sharper mesh-size constraints are necessary for a uniform L2-approximation of the wave function. The spectral time-splitting approximation under study will be proved to be unconditionally stable, time reversible, and gauge invariant. It conserves the position density and gives uniform L2-approximation of the wave function for k = o(e) and h = O(e). Extensive numerical examples in both one and two space dimensions and analytical considerations based on the Wigner transform even show that weaker constraints (e.g., k independent of e, and h = O (e)) are admissible for obtaining "correct" observables. Finally, we address the application to nonlinear Schrodinger equations and conduct some numerical experiments to predict the corresponding admissible meshing strategies.

[1]  Peter A. Markowich,et al.  A Wigner-Measure Analysis of the Dufort-Frankel Scheme for the Schrödinger Equation , 2002, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[2]  B. Desjardins,et al.  SEMICLASSICAL LIMIT OF THE DERIVATIVE NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION , 2000 .

[3]  C. David Levermore,et al.  The Semiclassical Limit of the Defocusing NLS Hierarchy , 1999 .

[4]  Peter A. Markowich,et al.  Numerical approximation of quadratic observables of Schrödinger-type equations in the semi-classical limit , 1999, Numerische Mathematik.

[5]  P. Miller,et al.  On the semiclassical limit of the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation , 1998 .

[6]  P. Markowich,et al.  Homogenization limits and Wigner transforms , 1997 .

[7]  P. Markowich,et al.  A Wigner‐function approach to (semi)classical limits: Electrons in a periodic potential , 1994 .

[8]  D. Pathria,et al.  Pseudo-spectral solution of nonlinear Schro¨dinger equations , 1990 .

[9]  Mickens Stable explicit schemes for equations of Schrödinger type. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[10]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Stability analysis of difference schemes for variable coefficient Schro¨dinger type equations , 1987 .

[11]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Stable explicit schemes for equations of the Schro¨dinger type , 1986 .

[12]  J. Pasciak Spectral and pseudospectral methods for advection equations , 1980 .

[13]  Shi Jin,et al.  Numerical Study of Time-Splitting Spectral Discretizations of Nonlinear Schrödinger Equations in the Semiclassical Regimes , 2003, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  P. Markowich,et al.  Quantum hydrodynamics, Wigner transforms, the classical limit , 1997 .

[15]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Semiclassical Behavior in the NLS Equation: Optical Shocks - Focusing Instabilities , 1994 .

[16]  C. David Levermore,et al.  The Behavior of Solutions of the NLS Equation in the Semiclassical Limit , 1994 .

[17]  P. Gérard Microlocal defect measures , 1991 .

[18]  L. Tartar H-measures, a new approach for studying homogenisation, oscillations and concentration effects in partial differential equations , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics.

[19]  D. Gottlieb,et al.  Numerical analysis of spectral methods : theory and applications , 1977 .