Feature fatigue analysis in product development

Capability and usability are two important dimensions of product quality. A product loaded with more features increases its capability and attractiveness. However, too many features will decrease the product's usability. After using the high-feature product, customers may become dissatisfied with unneeded features and the complexity of the product. This phenomenon is called ‘feature fatigue’ (FF). FF leads to dissatisfaction and negative Word-of-Mouth, which damages the reputation of the product and the firm's long-term profit. In this paper, we propose a novel approach based on Kano's model to alleviate FF. We firstly focus on working out real customer requirements (CRs) by using an improved Kano's model, which takes the imprecision and uncertainty of CRs into account, to reduce unneeded features. Then, a product capability (PC) model, a product usability model and a FF index are proposed to analyse the level of FF of each feature, thus helping designers balance PC and usability. With the proposed approach, designers can get support regarding decisions on how many and what features to add to the product to alleviate FF, thus improving product quality. A case study about mobile phones is presented to illustrate the proposed approach.

[1]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[2]  Aruna Lakshmanan,et al.  The Aha! Experience: Insight and Discontinuous Learning in Product Usage , 2011 .

[3]  A. Sela,et al.  How Attribute Quantity Influences Option Choice , 2012 .

[4]  Alberto Marcati,et al.  The Effect of Adding Features on Product Attractiveness: The Role of Product Perceived Congruity , 2008 .

[5]  I. Simonson,et al.  The Effect of New Product Features on Brand Choice , 1996 .

[6]  K. Lancaster,et al.  Consumer Demand. A New Approach. , 1972 .

[7]  I. Simonson,et al.  Experimental Evidence on the Negative Effect of Product Features and Sales Promotions on Brand Choice , 1994 .

[8]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Feature Fatigue: When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing , 2005 .

[9]  Timo Jokela,et al.  When good things happen to bad products: where are the benefits of usability in the consumer appliance market? , 2004, INTR.

[10]  Brett R. Gordon,et al.  Competitive Strategy for Open Source Software , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Tripat Gill,et al.  Convergent Products: What Functionalities Add More Value to the Base? , 2008 .

[12]  M Wu,et al.  A continuous fuzzy Kano’s model for customer requirements analysis in product development , 2012 .

[13]  John G. Lynch,et al.  As Time Goes By: Do Cold Feet Follow Warm Intentions for Really New versus Incrementally New Products? , 2008 .

[14]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Asynchronous Adoption Patterns of Mobile Services , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Debora Viana Thompson,et al.  Defeating feature fatigue. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[16]  Xi Yang,et al.  An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Seung Ik Baek,et al.  Understanding Key Attributes in Mobile Service: Kano Model Approach , 2009, HCI.

[18]  C. H. Yeh,et al.  Integration of four-phase QFD and TRIZ in product R&D: a notebook case study , 2011 .

[19]  C Berger,et al.  KANO’S METHODS FOR UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER-DEFINED QUALITY , 1993 .

[20]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  A Model of Add-On Pricing , 2003 .

[21]  Dj Dirk Agterhuis Effects of apps on consumer behavior of smartphones and telecommunication providers:feature fatigue vs. mass customization , 2012 .

[22]  Rebecca W. Hamilton,et al.  Is There a Substitute for Direct Experience? Comparing Consumers’ Preferences after Direct and Indirect Product Experiences , 2007 .

[23]  Ming Li,et al.  Feature fatigue analysis in product development using Bayesian networks , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Rainer Leisten,et al.  Software metrics for enhanced business excellence: An investigation of research issues from a macro perspective , 2006 .

[25]  Yu-Cheng Lee,et al.  A new fuzzy concept approach for Kano's model , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[27]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Underpredicting Learning after Initial Experience with a Product , 2011 .

[28]  D. Thompson,et al.  The Social Utility of Feature Creep , 2011 .

[29]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[30]  Tzong-Chen Wu,et al.  Contribution to quality research: a literature review of Kano's model from 1998 to 2012 , 2015 .

[31]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[32]  Hsien-Tang Ko,et al.  Comparative analysis of experience-oriented customer needs and manufacturer supplies based on the Kano model , 2013 .

[33]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[34]  Ming Li,et al.  A multi-objective genetic algorithm approach for solving feature addition problem in feature fatigue analysis , 2013, J. Intell. Manuf..

[35]  den Ph Elke Ouden,et al.  The 'Double-Edged Sword' of high-feature products: an explorative study of the business impact , 2008 .

[36]  Dong-Seok Lee,et al.  Lessons from Applying Usability Engineering to Fast-Paced Product Development Organizations , 2007, HCI.