Compressive response and energy absorption of foam EPDM

Ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer foam was prepared by two different processing routes. The microstructure and mechanical properties of the foams with wide relative density ranging from 0.11 to 0.62 have been studied via scanning electron microscopy and mechanical testing, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy shows that the foam with lower relative density has a unique bimodal cell size structure, which the larger cells inlay among the smaller cells, while the foam articles with higher relative density have thicker cell walls with few small cells. The compressive stress–strain curves show that the foam articles with lower relative density have three regimes: linear elastic, a wide slightly rising plateau, and densification, while the foam articles with higher relative density have only two regimes: the longer linear elastic and densification. The relative modulus increases with the increase in the relative density. The contribution of the gas trapped in the cell to the modulus could be neglected. The energy absorbed per unit volume is relationship with the permitted stress and the relative density. The efficiency and the ideality parameter were evaluated from the compressive stress–strain plots. The parameters were plotted against stress to obtain maximum efficiency and the maximum ideality region, which can be used for optimizing the choice for practical applications in cushioning and packaging. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007

[1]  L. Froyen,et al.  Investigation on the influence of cell shape anisotropy on the mechanical performance of closed cell aluminium foams using micro-computed tomography , 2005 .

[2]  Giuseppe Sala,et al.  Deformation mechanisms and energy absorption of polystyrene foams for protective helmets , 2002 .

[3]  Joseph Miltz,et al.  Energy absorption characteristics of polymeric foams used as cushioning materials , 1990 .

[4]  V. Shim,et al.  A visco-hyperelastic constitutive description of elastomeric foam , 2004 .

[5]  S. Mahapatra,et al.  Compressive Deformation and Energy Absorption Characteristics of Conductive Carbon Black Reinforced Microcellular EPDM Vulcanizates , 2005 .

[6]  Joseph Miltz,et al.  Evaluation of cushioning properties of plastic foams from compressive measurements , 1981 .

[7]  D. Rodrigue,et al.  Polyethylene-Kevlar Composite Foams I: Morphology , 2003 .

[8]  D. Rodrigue,et al.  Polyethylene-Kevlar Composite Foams III: Torsion Properties , 2005 .

[9]  Lorna J. Gibson,et al.  Compressive and tensile behaviour of aluminum foams , 1999 .

[10]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Constitutive modeling of polymeric foam material subjected to dynamic crash loading , 1998 .

[11]  D. Rodrigue,et al.  Polyethylene-Kevlar Composite Foams II: Mechanical Properties , 2004 .

[12]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Deformation and energy absorption diagrams for cellular solids , 1984 .

[13]  H. Hassan,et al.  Physical studies of foamed reinforced rubber composites Part I. Mechanical properties of foamed ethylene–propylene–diene terpolymer and nitrile–butadiene rubber composites , 2002 .

[14]  Li Liu,et al.  Study on microstructure and mechanical properties relationship of short fibers/rubber foam composites , 2004 .

[15]  S. Mizrahi,et al.  Mechanical properties and behavior of open cell foams used as cushioning materials , 1990 .