Approaches for Model Validation: Methodology and Illustration on a Sheet Metal Flanging Process

Model validation has become an increasingly important issue in the decision-making process for model development, as numerical simulations have widely demonstrated their benefits in reducing development time and cost. Frequently, the trustworthiness of models is inevitably questioned in this competitive and demanding world. By definition, model validation is a means to systematically establish a level of confidence of models. To demonstrate the processes of model validation for simulation-based models, a sheet metal flanging process is used as an example with the objective that is to predict the final geometry. or springback. This forming process involves large deformation of sheet metals, contact between tooling and blanks, and process uncertainties. The corresponding uncertainties in material properties and process conditions are investigated and taken as inputs to the uncertainty propagation, where metamodels, known as a model of the model, are developed to efficiently and effectively compute the total uncertainty/variation of the final configuration. Three model validation techniques (graphical comparison, confidence interval technique, and r 2 technique) are applied and examined; furthermore, strength and weakness of each technique are examined. The latter two techniques offer a broader perspective due to the involvement of statistical and uncertainty analyses. The proposed model validation approaches reduce the number of experiments to one for each design point by shifting the evaluation effort to the uncertainty propagation of the simulation model rather than using costly physical experiments.

[1]  Thaweepat Buranathiti,et al.  Model validation via uncertainty propagation and data transformations , 2004 .

[2]  Robert G. Sargent,et al.  Validation and verification of simulation models , 1999, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004..

[3]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[4]  R. H. Wagoner,et al.  Role of plastic anisotropy and its evolution on springback , 2002 .

[5]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Key Inspection Characteristics , 2001 .

[6]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Prediction and elimination of springback in straight flanging using computer aided design methods: Part 1. Experimental investigations , 2001 .

[7]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Prediction and elimination of springback in straight flanging using computer-aided design methods: Part 2: FEM predictions and tool design , 2001 .

[8]  M. Cardew-Hall,et al.  Experimental validation of sheet thickness optimisation for superplastic forming of engineering structures , 2001 .

[9]  W. L. Oberkampf What are validation experiments? , 2001 .

[10]  John Garcia THE NEED FOR COMPUTATIONAL MODEL VALIDATION , 2001 .

[11]  Guangyao Li,et al.  Element‐free Galerkin method for contact problems in metal forming analysis , 2001 .

[12]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Gradient‐based refinement indicators in adaptive finite element analysis with special reference to sheet metal forming , 2000 .

[13]  Jian Cao,et al.  Effective Models for Prediction of Springback in Flanging , 2000, Manufacturing Engineering.

[14]  François M. Hemez,et al.  MODEL VALIDATION AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION. , 2000 .

[15]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[16]  T. Simpson,et al.  Comparative studies of metamodeling techniques under multiple modeling criteria , 2000 .

[17]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Validation Methodology in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2000 .

[18]  J. V. Grice,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiment , 2000, Technometrics.

[19]  Timothy G. Trucano,et al.  Statistical Validation of Engineering and Scientific Models: Background , 1999 .

[20]  F. Barlat,et al.  Yield function development for aluminum alloy sheets , 1997 .

[21]  Xiantao Li,et al.  Model validation and uncertainty , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[22]  Jian Cao,et al.  Numerical simulations of sheet-metal forming , 1995 .

[23]  F. Barlat,et al.  A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials , 1991 .

[24]  Henry P. Wynn,et al.  [Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments]: Rejoinder , 1989 .

[25]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Variational approach to probabilistic finite elements , 1988 .

[26]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Random field finite elements , 1986 .

[27]  J. Chaboche Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity , 1986 .

[28]  Averill M. Law,et al.  Simulation Modeling and Analysis , 1982 .

[29]  R. Hill Theoretical plasticity of textured aggregates , 1979, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[30]  James V. Beck,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science , 1977 .

[31]  Klaus Hinkelmann,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiment , 1975 .

[32]  W. Hosford A Generalized Isotropic Yield Criterion , 1972 .