In vitro evaluation of some parameters involved in mucoadhesion of aqueous polymeric dispersions

Abstract Context: The mucoadhesive formulations are constantly developing due to their relevance in the drug delivery to various districts of the organism. Objective: The purpose of this study was to find a direct link between physicochemical properties of the polymers and their adhesive ability in order to offer guidelines for the development of mucoadhesive semisolid formulations. Materials and methods: Twelve polymers were dispersed in water and characterized with regard to their mucoadhesiveness, apparent viscosity, contact angle on solid surface, and hydrodynamic diameter of their molecules. The adhesive properties were related to the other measured parameters. Results and discussion: The data seem to indicate the existence of an optimal value of viscosity, around 5–6 Pa s, to obtain the highest mucoadhesiveness of the polymeric dispersions. Regarding the molecular sizes, the best mucoadhesive performances seem to be given from polymers with a hydrodynamic diameter lower than 350–400 nm. In any case, the ability to wet the surface by the polymeric dispersion seems to play an essential role in bioadhesion process, capable of strongly limiting the phenomenon. Conclusions: Performing simple in vitro measurements, it seems possible to identify the best polymeric concentration to obtain a semisolid formulation with good mucoadhesive properties.

[1]  V. Khutoryanskiy Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. , 2011, Macromolecular bioscience.

[2]  C Caramella,et al.  Thermally sensitive gels based on chitosan derivatives for the treatment of oral mucositis. , 2010, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[3]  A. Tripathi,et al.  Are in vivo gastric bioadhesive forces accurately reflected by in vitro experiments? , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[4]  David S. Jones,et al.  Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. , 2009, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[5]  G. Sandri,et al.  Mucoadhesive behaviour of emulsions containing polymeric emulsifier. , 2008, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[6]  H. Takeuchi,et al.  Evaluation of mucoadhesiveness of polymers by BIACORE method and mucin-particle method. , 2008, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[7]  P. Sriamornsak,et al.  Viscometric study of pectin–mucin interaction and its mucoadhesive bond strength , 2008 .

[8]  V. Khutoryanskiy,et al.  Mucoadhesive interactions of amphiphilic cationic copolymers based on [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride. , 2007, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[9]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces: effects of pillar radius, aspect ratio, and preload. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  J. Smart The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[11]  H. Hägerström,et al.  Pharmaceutical applications of mucoadhesion for the non‐oral routes , 2005, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[12]  H. Hägerström,et al.  Limitations of the rheological mucoadhesion method: the effect of the choice of conditions and the rheological synergism parameter. , 2003, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[13]  Anke Lindner,et al.  Cohesive failure of thin layers of soft model adhesives under tension , 2003 .

[14]  K. Leong,et al.  Influences of substrate wettability and liquid viscosity on isothermal spreading of liquid droplets on solid surfaces , 2002 .

[15]  H. Hägerström,et al.  Interpretation of mucoadhesive properties of polymer gel preparations using a tensile strength method , 2001, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[16]  C. M. Keary Characterization of METHOCEL cellulose ethers by aqueous SEC with multiple detectors , 2001 .

[17]  S. Rossi,et al.  Characterization of chitosan hydrochloride-mucin interaction by means of viscosimetric and turbidimetric measurements. , 2000, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[18]  I. Oh,et al.  Mucoadhesive and Physicochemical Characterization of Carbopol-Poloxamer Gels Containing Triamcinolone Acetonide , 2000, Drug development and industrial pharmacy.

[19]  S. Herminghaus,et al.  Wetting: Statics and dynamics , 1997 .

[20]  David S. Jones,et al.  Textural, viscoelastic and mucoadhesive properties of pharmaceutical gels composed of cellulose polymers , 1997 .

[21]  F. Otero-Espinar,et al.  Tanned leather : a good model for determining hydrogels bioadhesion , 1996 .

[22]  D. Craig,et al.  An investigation into the rheological, dielectric and mucoadhesive properties of poly(acrylic acid) gel systems , 1995 .

[23]  E. Mathiowitz,et al.  Bioadhesive microspheres. I: A novel electrobalance-based method to study adhesive interactions between individual microspheres and intestinal mucosa , 1995 .

[24]  H. Junginger,et al.  A surface energy analysis of mucoadhesion II. Prediction of mucoadhesive performance by spreading coefficients , 1993 .

[25]  Susi Burgalassi,et al.  Evaluation of muco-adhesive properties and in vivo activity of ophthalmic vehicles based on hyaluronic acid , 1989 .

[26]  Nikolaos A. Peppas,et al.  Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer bioadhesion on soft tissues , 1985 .

[27]  J. Robinson,et al.  Physico-chemical properties of water insoluble polymers important to mucin/epithelial adhesion☆ , 1985 .

[28]  P. Gennes Wetting: statics and dynamics , 1985 .

[29]  N. Peppas,et al.  Bioadhesive intraoral release systems: design, testing and analysis. , 1984, Biomaterials.

[30]  J D Smart,et al.  An in‐vitro investigation of mucosa‐adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery , 1984, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[31]  Kinam Park,et al.  Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral-controlled drug delivery: method to study bioadhesion , 1984 .

[32]  Robert L. Davidson,et al.  Handbook of Water Soluble Gums and Resins , 1980 .

[33]  R. Manly Adhesion in biological systems. , 1967, Science.

[34]  Walter J. Murphy,et al.  ADVANCES IN CHEMISTRY SERIES: Numbers 15 and 17 Demonstrate Rapidly Crowing Interest in Documentation; International Conference To Be Held in 1958 , 1956 .

[35]  Rahamatullah Shaikh,et al.  Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems , 2011, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[36]  S. Rossi,et al.  Chitosan gels for the vaginal delivery of lactic acid: Relevance of formulation parameters to mucoadhesion and release mechanisms , 2008, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[37]  S. Rossi,et al.  Ophthalmic delivery systems based on drug-polymer-polymer ionic ternary interaction: in vitro and in vivo characterization. , 2006, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[38]  J. Desbrières,et al.  Rheological characterization of cellulosic microfibril suspensions. Role of polymeric additives , 2001 .

[39]  S. Rossi,et al.  Rheological and tensile tests for the assessment of polymer-mucin interactions , 1994 .

[40]  Nikolaos A. Peppas,et al.  Pharmaceutical and Medical Aspects of Bioadhesive Systems for Drug Administration , 1988 .

[41]  C. Horie,et al.  Materials for Conservation: Organic Consolidants, Adhesives and Coatings , 1987 .

[42]  F. E. Bailey,et al.  Poly(ethylene oxide) , 1976 .

[43]  James L. Chen,et al.  CHAPTER 10 – COMPOSITIONS PRODUCING ADHESION THROUGH HYDRATION , 1970 .

[44]  W. A. Zisman,et al.  Relation of the Equilibrium Contact Angle to Liquid and Solid Constitution , 1964 .

[45]  W. Zisman,et al.  Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion , 1964 .