MAXIMIZING THE BENEFITS OF TASK CONFLICT: THE ROLE OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT

Intragroup conflict research has shown that task conflict can improve group outcomes, but it has not addressed how groups ensure that the positive aspects of task conflict are realized. This study examines the influence of group conflict management on group effectiveness, as well as the moderating role of group conflict management on task conflict—group outcome relationships. Results of a field survey of 96 business school project groups indicated that the use of agreeable conflict management in response to task conflict was associated with greater group satisfaction. Results examining group conflict management as a moderator showed that the relationship between task conflict and group performance was positive when conflict was actively managed and negative when it was passively managed. Similarly, task conflict improved group satisfaction when managed with agreeable behavior, and harmed satisfaction when neutral or disagreeable behaviors were used. Results from this work provide an important first look at how group conflict management behaviors directly impact group outcomes and affect task conflict—group outcome relationships.

[1]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[2]  J. A. Wall,et al.  Conflict and Its Management , 1995 .

[3]  Martin Euwema,et al.  Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior , 1995 .

[4]  J. S. Himes.  Conflict and Conflict Management , 1980 .

[5]  Michael N. Chanin,et al.  A Study of the Relationship between Jungian Personality Dimensions and Conflict-Handling Behavior , 1984 .

[6]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[7]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. , 1992 .

[8]  R. Kilmann,et al.  Developing a Forced-Choice Measure of Conflict-Handling Behavior: The "Mode" Instrument , 1977 .

[9]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[10]  R. A. Cosier,et al.  POSITIVE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT: A FIELD ASSESSMENT , 1990 .

[11]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[12]  Clint Chadwick,et al.  TO AGREE OR NOT TO AGREE: THE EFFECTS OF VALUE CONGRUENCE, INDIVIDUAL DEMOGRAPHIC DISSIMILARITY, AND CONFLICT ON WORKGROUP OUTCOMES , 1997 .

[13]  M. Nicholson.  The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[14]  van de Evert Vliert,et al.  Agreeableness and activeness as components of conflict behaviors. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Kenneth H. Price,et al.  Process and Outcome Expectations for the Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus Techniques of Strategic Decision Making , 1991 .

[16]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  The impact of intragroup conflict on effectiveness: A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of conflict. , 1992 .

[17]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[18]  Kim,et al.  Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement , 1986 .

[19]  Ken A. Smith,et al.  Making Use of Difference: Diversity, Debate, and Decision Comprehensiveness in Top Management Teams , 1999 .

[20]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[21]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[22]  K. Sirotnik.  PSYCHOMETRIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE UNIT‐OF‐ANALYSIS PROBLEM (WITH EXAMPLES FROM THE MEASUREMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE) , 1980 .

[23]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-Making Groups , 1954 .

[24]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Structured Conflict and Consensus Outcomes in Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[25]  M. Rahim,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: first-order factor model and its invariance across groups. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict , 1997 .

[27]  T. J. Bergmann,et al.  Conflict styles as indicators of behavioral patterns in interpersonal conflicts , 1995 .

[28]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Do friends perform better than acquaintances? the interaction of friendship, conflict, and task , 1993 .

[29]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Resolving interpersonal conflicts: An analysis of stylistic consistency. , 1987 .

[30]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  The Dynamics of Intense Work Groups: A Study of British String Quartets , 1991 .

[31]  Robin L. Pinkley,et al.  Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. , 1990 .

[32]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[33]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[34]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[35]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  RESOLVING THE PARADOX OF CONFLICT, STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 1994 .