Skill-based differences in option generation in a complex task: a verbal protocol analysis

In recent models of decision-making, cognitive scientists have examined the relationship between option generation and successful performance. These models suggest that those who are successful at decision-making generate few courses of action and typically choose the first, often best, option. Scientists working in the area of expert performance, on the other hand, have demonstrated that the ability to generate and prioritize task-relevant options during situation assessment is associated with successful performance. In the current study, we measured law enforcement officers’ performance and thinking in a simulated task environment to examine the option generation strategies used during decision-making in a complex domain. The number of options generated during assessment (i.e., making decisions about events in the environment) and intervention (i.e., making decisions about personal courses of action) phases of decision-making interact to produce a successful outcome. The data are explained with respect to the development of a situational representation and long-term working memory skills capable of supporting both option generation processes.

[1]  A. D. D. Groot.  Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[2]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[3]  M. Raab.  Decision making in sports: Influence of complexity on implicit and explicit learning , 2003 .

[4]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[5]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  How experts' adaptations to representative task demands account for the expertise effect in memory recall: comment on Vicente and Wang (1998). , 2000, Psychological review.

[6]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[8]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[9]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[10]  Joseph G. Johnson,et al.  Take The First: Option-generation and resulting choices , 2003 .

[11]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. , 1999 .

[12]  Paul Ward,et al.  Expert Performance in Nursing: Reviewing Research on Expertise in Nursing Within the Framework of the Expert‐Performance Approach , 2007, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[13]  J. A. Scott Kelso,et al.  Reaction-anticipation transitions in human perception-action patterns , 1996 .

[14]  Caroline E. Zsambok,et al.  Characteristics of Skilled Option Generation in Chess , 1995 .

[15]  Gary Klein,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[16]  H. Simon,et al.  The mind's eye in chess. , 1973 .

[17]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[18]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  THE MIND'S EYE IN CHESS , 1988 .

[19]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[20]  K. Davids,et al.  Declarative knowledge in sport: a by-product of experience or a characteristic of expertise? , 1995 .

[21]  Kevin A. Gluck,et al.  Verbal Protocol Analysis for Validation of UAV Operator Model , 2003 .

[22]  A. Williams,et al.  Perceptual and Cognitive Skill Development in Soccer: The Multidimensional Nature of Expert Performance , 2003 .

[23]  Karol G. Ross,et al.  The Recognition-Primed Decision Model , 2004 .

[24]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[25]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  David W. Eccles,et al.  Competition-specific preparation and expert performance. , 2009 .

[27]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. , 1996, Psychological review.

[28]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[29]  David W. Eccles,et al.  The effect of manipulating context-specific information on perceptual-cognitive processes during a simulated anticipation task. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[30]  E. Brunswik.  Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[31]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Templates in Chess Memory: A Mechanism for Recalling Several Boards , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Science Current Directions in Psychological of Expert and Exceptional Performance Capturing the Naturally Occurring Superior Performance of Experts in the Laboratory : toward a Science on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[33]  Paul Ward,et al.  Complex Perceptual-Cognitive Expertise in a Simulated Task Environment , 2013 .

[34]  Paul Ward,et al.  Option Generation and Decision Making in Critical-Care Nursing , 2010 .

[35]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data, Rev. ed. , 1993 .