Computational models of distributed aberration in ultrasound breast imaging

Two methods for simulation of ultrasound wavefront distortion are introduced and compared with aberration produced in simulations using digitized breast tissue specimens and a conventional multiple time-shift screen model. In the first method, aberrators are generated using a computational model of breast anatomy. In the second method, 10 to 12 irregularly shaped, strongly scattering inclusions are superimposed on the multiple-screen model to create a screen-inclusion model. Linear 2-D propagation of a 7.5-MHz planar, pulsed wavefront through each aberrator is computed using a first-order k-space method. The anatomical and screen-inclusion models reproduce two characteristics of arrival-time fluctuations observed in simulations using the digitized specimens that are not represented in simulations using the multiple-screen model: non-Gaussian first-order statistics and sharp changes in the rms arrival-time fluctuation as a function of propagation distance. The anatomical and screen-inclusion models both produce energy- level fluctuations similar to the digitized specimens, but the anatomical model more closely matches the pulse-shape distortion produced by the specimens. Both aberration models can readily be extended to 3-D, and the screen-inclusion model has the advantage of simplicity of implementation. Both models should enable more rigorous evaluation of adaptive focusing algorithms than is possible using conventional time-shift screen models.

[1]  R C Waag,et al.  Measurement and correction of ultrasonic pulse distortion produced by the human breast. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  T. D. Mast,et al.  Simulation of ultrasonic focus aberration and correction through human tissue. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  K Bliznakova,et al.  A three-dimensional breast software phantom for mammography simulation. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Optimal adaptive focusing through heterogeneous media with the minimally invasive inverse filter. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Improved estimation of phase aberration profiles , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  Robert C. Waag,et al.  Evaluation of backpropagation methods for transmit focus compensation , 2001, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263).

[7]  Svein-Erik Måsøy,et al.  Correction of ultrasonic wave aberration with a time delay and amplitude filter. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  G.E. Trahey,et al.  A comparative evaluation of several algorithms for phase aberration correction , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  G Cloutier,et al.  A point process approach to assess the frequency dependence of ultrasound backscattering by aggregating red blood cells. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R C Waag,et al.  Correction of ultrasonic wavefront distortion using backpropagation and a reference waveform method for time-shift compensation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  A. Wood,et al.  Simulation of Stationary Gaussian Processes in [0, 1] d , 1994 .

[12]  Deng-Huei Huang,et al.  Analysis and correction of ultrasonic wavefront distortion based on a multilayer phase-screen model , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Eirik Mo,et al.  Eigenfunction analysis of stochastic backscatter for characterization of acoustic aberration in medical ultrasound imaging. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C. Dorme,et al.  Ultrasonic beam steering through inhomogeneous layers with a time reversal mirror , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Phase-aberration correction using signals from point reflectors and diffuse scatterers: basic principles , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. , 2002, Medical physics.

[17]  T. D. Mast,et al.  A k-space method for coupled first-order acoustic propagation equations. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A. Berkhoff,et al.  Correction of concentrated and distributed aberrations in medical ultrasound imaging , 1996, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings.

[19]  W. Walker,et al.  A speckle target adaptive imaging technique in the presence of distributed aberrations , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  R C Waag,et al.  Time-shift compensation of ultrasonic pulse focus degradation using least-mean-square error estimates of arrival time. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  T. D. Mast,et al.  Simulation of ultrasonic pulse propagation through the abdominal wall. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  E. Marchetti,et al.  Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics images of the Trapezium Cluster ⋆ , 2007, 0709.3994.