Tactile learning is task specific but transfers between fingers

Practice-related improvement in visual perception is highly specific for properties of the stimulus used in training. We explored the specificity of such perceptual learning in the human tactile system, using gratings consisting of alternating ridges and grooves. Practice effects on grating discrimination showed limited transfer between grating sets defined by spatial variation in either groove width or ridge width, consistent with partially overlapping neural representations of these two spatial parameters. In contrast, substantial interdigital transfer of practice effects occurred for discrimination of gratings varying in either spatial parameter and also for spatial acuity-dependent discrimination of grating orientation. We conclude that tactile learning, although quite as task specific as in other sensory systems, generalizes with considerable facility across fingers, unlike visual learning, which is highly location specific.

[1]  F. B. Dresslar Studies in the psychology of touch , 1894 .

[2]  The duration of cutaneous sensation (I) and the improvement of its sensible discrimination by practice (II). , 1933 .

[3]  E. Gibson,et al.  Improvement in perceptual judgments as a function of controlled practice or training. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[5]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch , 1972 .

[6]  O Braddick,et al.  Orientation-Specific Learning in Stereopsis , 1973, Perception.

[7]  O. Jones Effect of phloridzin and phloroglucinol on apple shoots , 1976, Nature.

[8]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Learning-like phenomena in stereopsis , 1976, Nature.

[9]  S. McKee,et al.  Improvement in vernier acuity with practice , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J M Loomis,et al.  An investigation of tactile hyperacuity. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[11]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[12]  C. Robinson,et al.  Organization of somatosensory receptive fields in cortical areas 7b, retroinsula, postauditory and granular insula of M. fascicularis , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  H Burton,et al.  Somatotopographic organization in the second somatosensory area of M. fascicularis , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  I. Darian‐Smith,et al.  Peripheral neural representation of the spatial frequency of a grating moving across the monkey's finger pad. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Progression of change following median nerve section in the cortical representation of the hand in areas 3b and 1 in adult owl and squirrel monkeys , 1983, Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Kaas,et al.  The relation of corpus callosum connections to architectonic fields and body surface maps in sensorimotor cortex of new and old world monkeys , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  G. Lamb Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  P. Barbaresi,et al.  Callosal mechanism for the interhemispheric transfer of hand somatosensory information in the monkey , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  Elisabeth A. Murray,et al.  Relative contributions of SII and area 5 to tactile discrimination in monkeys , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  M. Cynader,et al.  Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  A. Goodwin,et al.  A stimulator for moving textured surfaces sinusoidally across the skin , 1985, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  R. Klatzky,et al.  There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. , 1987 .

[23]  David P. Friedman,et al.  Physiological evidence for serial processing in somatosensory cortex. , 1987, Science.

[24]  J. Kaas,et al.  Consistent features of the representation of the hand in area 3b of macaque monkeys. , 1987, Somatosensory research.

[25]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[26]  James C. Craig Kurzdarstellungen von Forschungsarbeiten Courts descriptions de recherches , 1988 .

[27]  K. Sathian,et al.  Tactile sensing of surface features , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  M. Heller Texture perception in sighted and blind observers , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  K Sathian,et al.  Spatial and temporal factors determining afferent fiber responses to a grating moving sinusoidally over the monkey's fingerpad , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Perceived roughness of a grating: correlation with responses of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the monkey's fingerpad , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  B Hughes,et al.  Perceptual learning of spatiotemporal events: evidence from an unfamiliar modality. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  M. Calford,et al.  Interhemispheric transfer of plasticity in the cerebral cortex. , 1990, Science.

[33]  K. Sathian,et al.  Altered responses to cutaneous stimuli in the second somatosensory cortex following lesions of the postcentral gyrus in infant and juvenile macaques , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  C. Connor,et al.  Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Kaas Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. , 1991, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Reorganization of somatosensory area 3b representations in adult owl monkeys after digital syndactyly. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  K Sathian,et al.  The role of spatially selective attention in the tactile perception of texture , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  D Sagi,et al.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  G L Shulman,et al.  Selective attention in vibrotactile tasks: Detecting the presence and absence of amplitude change , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Topographic reorganization of the hand representation in cortical area 3b owl monkeys trained in a frequency-discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Progressive improvement in discriminative abilities in adult owl monkeys performing a tactile frequency discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Changes in the distributed temporal response properties of SI cortical neurons reflect improvements in performance on a temporally based tactile discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  A J O'Toole,et al.  Learning to See Random-Dot Stereograms , 1992, Perception.

[44]  W M Jenkins,et al.  Frequency discrimination training engaging a restricted skin surface results in an emergence of a cutaneous response zone in cortical area 3a. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  H. Pashler,et al.  Improvement in line orientation discrimination is retinally local but dependent on cognitive set , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[47]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Cortical plasticity and memory , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[48]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[49]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates of plasticity in the adult human brain. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  C D Gilbert,et al.  Early perceptual learning. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  D. Tanné,et al.  Perceptual learning: learning to see , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[52]  K O Johnson,et al.  The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans , 1994, Neurology.

[53]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  A psychophysical study of the mechanisms of sensory recovery following nerve injury in humans. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile resolution: peripheral neural mechanisms underlying the human capacity to determine positions of objects contacting the fingerpad , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[55]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Remodelling of hand representation in adult cortex determined by timing of tactile stimulation , 1995, Nature.

[56]  N. Weinberger Dynamic regulation of receptive fields and maps in the adult sensory cortex. , 1995, Annual Review of Neuroscience.

[57]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Touching the phantom limb , 1995, Nature.

[58]  K. Sathian,et al.  Tactile spatial acuity at the human fingertip and lip , 1996, Neurology.