Optic Flow

This paper otTers a quick review of the subject of “optic flow” in its conceptual and computational aspects, The theory is evaluated in terms of possible applications in the neurophysiology and experimental psychology of spatial sensorymotor behaviour and perception. The problem of which kind of detector is suited to extract various aspects of optic tlow is given special attention. It is shown that the possibilities are actually much more various than is reflected in the current (even the frankly speculative) literature. It is argued that a system that is sensitive to the relative time changes of the orientation differences of image details is especially suited for an analysis of the optic flow with regard to the information concerning the three dimensional shape of objects such as is contained in the Ilow. Thus the orientation sensitive elements that are known to be abundantly present in the primary visual cortex of many vertebrates are hcrcby implicated as a quite likely substrate for the extraction of the solid shape ofenvironmental objects. In our opinion this possibility should be investigated with the same ardour as the usual interpretation, which holds this system responsible for the initial extraction of the contours of flat (i.e. defined in the image) shapes. A new, partial solution to the “structure from motion problem” is offered, that not only covers the usual case of shape extraction in the presence of rigid motions of the object, but also the much wider class of (non-rigid) bending deformations (such as occur in the non-rigid deformations of inextensible shells). These solutions violate all conditions required by the well known “structure from motion theorem”: the solutions are possible for point configurations in which no fourtuple of points moves as a rigid structure and for input data from merely two views, A numerical example illustrates how this algorithm can be used to predict side views of an object from very limited input data. Optic tlow Motion parallax Solid shape Rigid motion Non-rigid motion Depth illusions I. THE NOTION OF “OPTIC FLOW”

[1]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection) basic characteristics and visual-vestibular interactions , 1975, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  H. Wagner Flow-field variables trigger landing in flies , 1982, Nature.

[3]  S. Ullman Against direct perception , 1980, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[5]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Optical Monitoring of Ego-Motion for Movement with Respect to a Plane Surface , 1984 .

[6]  David N. Lee,et al.  Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics , 1981, Nature.

[7]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants , 1974 .

[8]  K. A. Stevens Surface tilt (the direction of slant): A neglected psychophysical variable , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  D Regan,et al.  Visually guided locomotion: psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. , 1979, Science.

[10]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Visual perception of rigidity of solid shape , 1976, Journal of mathematical biology.

[11]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Invariant Properties of the Motion Parallax Field due to the Movement of Rigid Bodies Relative to an Observer , 1975 .

[12]  J S Lappin,et al.  Accurate visual measurement of three-dimensional moving patterns. , 1983, Science.

[13]  K. Prazdny,et al.  Egomotion and relative depth map from optical flow , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  S. Ullman The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  D Regan,et al.  How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking and the direction we are moving? , 1982, Science.

[16]  M L BRAUNSTEIN,et al.  The perception of depth through motion. , 1962, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  M. Cynader,et al.  The visual perception of motion in depth. , 1979, Scientific American.

[18]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections , 1981, Nature.

[19]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[20]  K. A. Stevens The information content of texture gradients , 1981, Biological Cybernetics.