Specimen biasing to enhance or suppress secondary electron emission from charging specimens at low accelerating voltages

Biasing of the specimen is shown to produce improved images in the scanning electron microscope at low beam energies (0.8–2.5 keV) when charging effects (induced by the primary electron beam), topographic effects, or detector shadowing effects would otherwise be present. Examples of such improvement are given for gallium arsenide field-effect transistors (positive charging), patterned photoresist layers on silicon wafers (negative charging and shadowing in contact holes), fractured polymethylmethacrylate (negative charging), polyethylene wrapper material (positive charging), and polished diamond tools (positive charging). It is concluded that specimen biasing may be a simpler and more convenient way to achieve some of the advantages of the converted backscattered secondary electron (CBSE) technique for imaging, but without some of the fundamental disadvantages of that technique. Characterization of this backscattered electron-derived image bears further investigation for possible metrological applications.

[1]  M. Postek,et al.  Low-Profile High-Efficiency Microchannel-Plate Detector System for Scanning Electron Microscopy Applications , 1990 .

[2]  C. Evans,et al.  Inspection of Single-Point Diamond Turning Tools at Low Accelerating Voltage in a Scanning Electron Microscope , 1989 .

[3]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Metrological Electron Microscope for the Certification of Magnification and Linewidth Artifacts for the Semiconductor Industry , 1989, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  M. Postek,et al.  Evaluation of Single Point Diamond Turning Tools , 1988 .

[5]  David C. Joy,et al.  A model for calculating secondary and backscattered electron yields , 1987 .

[6]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Submicrometer Microelectronics Dimensional Metrology: Scanning Electron Microscopy , 1987, Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards.

[7]  O. Wells Low‐loss electron images of uncoated photoresist in the scanning electron microscope , 1986 .

[8]  J. F. Mancuso,et al.  Microchannel plate detector for low voltage scanning electron microscopes , 1985 .

[9]  D. Joy Beam interactions, contrast and resolution in the SEM , 1984 .

[10]  O. Wells Low‐Loss Image for Surface Scanning Electron Microscope , 1971 .

[11]  M. Postek,et al.  The relationship between accelerating voltage and electron detection modes to linewidth measurement in an SEM , 1988 .

[12]  C. Evans,et al.  Some Observations On Tool Sharpness And Sub-Surface Damage In Single Point Diamond Turning , 1987, Other Conferences.

[13]  H. P. Feuerbaum,et al.  Electron beam testing: Methods and applications , 1983 .

[14]  L. Reimer,et al.  Detector system for backscattered electrons by conversion to secondary electrons , 1979 .